Literature DB >> 25563343

Facet-dependent photoelectrochemical performance of TiO2 nanostructures: an experimental and computational study.

Chuanhao Li1, Christopher Koenigsmann, Wendu Ding, Benjamin Rudshteyn, Ke R Yang, Kevin P Regan, Steven J Konezny, Victor S Batista, Gary W Brudvig, Charles A Schmuttenmaer, Jae-Hong Kim.   

Abstract

The behavior of crystalline nanoparticles depends strongly on which facets are exposed. Some facets are more active than others, but it is difficult to selectively isolate particular facets. This study provides fundamental insights into photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performance of three types of TiO(2) nanoparticles with predominantly exposed {101}, {010}, or {001} facets, where 86-99% of the surface area is the desired facet. Photodegradation of methyl orange reveals that {001}-TiO(2) has 1.79 and 3.22 times higher photocatalytic activity than {010} and {101}-TiO(2), respectively. This suggests that the photochemical performance is highly correlated with the surface energy and the number of under-coordinated surface atoms. In contrast, the photoelectrochemical performance of the faceted TiO(2) nanoparticles sensitized with the commercially available MK-2 dye was highest with {010}-TiO(2) which yielded an overall cell efficiency of 6.1%, compared to 3.2% for {101}-TiO(2) and 2.6% for {001}-TiO(2) prepared under analogous conditions. Measurement of desorption kinetics and accompanying computational modeling suggests a stronger covalent interaction of the dye with the {010} and {101} facets compared with the {001} facet. Time-resolved THz spectroscopy and transient absorption spectroscopy measure faster electron injection dynamics when MK-2 is bound to {010} compared to other facets, consistent with extensive computational simulations which indicate that the {010} facet provides the most efficient and direct pathway for interfacial electron transfer. Our experimental and computational results establish for the first time that photoelectrochemical performance is dependent upon the binding energy of the dye as well as the crystalline structure of the facet, as opposed to surface energy alone.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25563343     DOI: 10.1021/ja5111078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  6 in total

1.  Single-molecule and -particle probing crystal edge/corner as highly efficient photocatalytic sites on a single TiO2 particle.

Authors:  Wei-Kang Wang; Jie-Jie Chen; Zai-Zhu Lou; Sooyeon Kim; Mamoru Fujitsuka; Han-Qing Yu; Tetsuro Majima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Facet-Engineered Surface and Interface Design of Photocatalytic Materials.

Authors:  Song Bai; Lili Wang; Zhengquan Li; Yujie Xiong
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 16.806

3.  Distinguishing faceted oxide nanocrystals with 17O solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Yuhong Li; Xin-Ping Wu; Ningxin Jiang; Ming Lin; Li Shen; Haicheng Sun; Yongzheng Wang; Meng Wang; Xiaokang Ke; Zhiwu Yu; Fei Gao; Lin Dong; Xuefeng Guo; Wenhua Hou; Weiping Ding; Xue-Qing Gong; Clare P Grey; Luming Peng
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Interfacial Charge Transfer in MoS2/TiO2 Heterostructured Photocatalysts: The Impact of Crystal Facets and Defects.

Authors:  Tingcha Wei; Woon Ming Lau; Xiaoqiang An; Xuelian Yu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Facet effect of hematite on the hydrolysis of phthalate esters under ambient humidity conditions.

Authors:  Xin Jin; Dingding Wu; Cun Liu; Shuhan Huang; Ziyan Zhou; Hao Wu; Xiru Chen; Meiying Huang; Shaoda Zhou; Cheng Gu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Revealing the role of crystal orientation of protective layers for stable zinc anode.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Jingyi Luan; Xiaobing Huang; Qi Wang; Dan Sun; Yougen Tang; Xiaobo Ji; Haiyan Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.