Lindsay M Squeglia1,2, Scott F Sorg1, Joanna Jacobus3,1, Ty Brumback1, Charles T Taylor1, Susan F Tapert4,5,6. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29452, USA. 3. VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA. 4. VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA. stapert@ucsd.edu. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. stapert@ucsd.edu. 6. VA San Diego Healthcare System, Psychology Service (116B), 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA, 92161, USA. stapert@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Having a positive family history of alcohol use disorders (FHP), as well as aberrant reward circuitry, has been implicated in the initiation of substance use during adolescence. This study explored the relationship between FHP status and reward circuitry in substance naïve youth to better understand future risky behaviors. METHODS: Participants were 49 FHP and 45 demographically matched family history negative (FHN) substance-naïve 12-14 year-olds (54 % female). Subjects underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging, including diffusion tensor imaging. Nucleus accumbens and orbitofrontal cortex volumes were derived using FreeSurfer, and FSL probabilistic tractography probed structural connectivity and differences in white matter diffusivity estimates (e.g. fractional anisotropy, and mean, radial, and axial diffusivity) between fiber tracts connecting these regions. RESULT: FHP and FHN youth did not differ on nucleus accumbens or orbitofrontal cortex volumes, white matter tract volumes, or percentages of streamlines (a proxy for fiber tract count) connecting these regions. However, within white matter tracts connecting the nucleus accumbens to the orbitofrontal cortex, FHP youth had significantly lower mean and radial diffusivity (ps < 0.03) than FHN youth. DISCUSSION: While white matter macrostructure between salience and reward regions did not differ between FHP and FHN youth, FHP youth showed greater white matter coherence within these tracts than FHN youth. Aberrant connectivity between reward regions in FHP youth could be linked to an increased risk for substance use initiation.
BACKGROUND: Having a positive family history of alcohol use disorders (FHP), as well as aberrant reward circuitry, has been implicated in the initiation of substance use during adolescence. This study explored the relationship between FHP status and reward circuitry in substance naïve youth to better understand future risky behaviors. METHODS:Participants were 49 FHP and 45 demographically matched family history negative (FHN) substance-naïve 12-14 year-olds (54 % female). Subjects underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging, including diffusion tensor imaging. Nucleus accumbens and orbitofrontal cortex volumes were derived using FreeSurfer, and FSL probabilistic tractography probed structural connectivity and differences in white matter diffusivity estimates (e.g. fractional anisotropy, and mean, radial, and axial diffusivity) between fiber tracts connecting these regions. RESULT: FHP and FHN youth did not differ on nucleus accumbens or orbitofrontal cortex volumes, white matter tract volumes, or percentages of streamlines (a proxy for fiber tract count) connecting these regions. However, within white matter tracts connecting the nucleus accumbens to the orbitofrontal cortex, FHP youth had significantly lower mean and radial diffusivity (ps < 0.03) than FHN youth. DISCUSSION: While white matter macrostructure between salience and reward regions did not differ between FHP and FHN youth, FHP youth showed greater white matter coherence within these tracts than FHN youth. Aberrant connectivity between reward regions in FHP youth could be linked to an increased risk for substance use initiation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adolescence; Cognitive control; Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); Family history of alcohol use disorders; Nucleus accumbens; Orbitofrontal cortex; Probabilistic tractography; Reward circuitry; Structural connectivity; Substance use disorders; White matter integrity
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Qian Jun Yap; Irvin Teh; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Min Yi Sum; Carissa Kuswanto; Kang Sim Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Lindsay M Squeglia; Carmen Pulido; Reagan R Wetherill; Joanna Jacobus; Gregory G Brown; Susan F Tapert Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Amy E Ramage; Ai-Ling Lin; Rene L Olvera; Peter T Fox; Douglas E Williamson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Margaret A Broadwater; Sung-Ho Lee; Yang Yu; Hongtu Zhu; Fulton T Crews; Donita L Robinson; Yen-Yu Ian Shih Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2017-07-09 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Johanna Seitz; Kayle S Sawyer; George Papadimitriou; Marlene Oscar-Berman; Isaac Ng; Antoni Kubicki; Palig Mouradian; Susan M Ruiz; Marek Kubicki; Gordon J Harris; Nikos Makris Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Natania A Crane; Stephanie M Gorka; Jessica Weafer; Scott A Langenecker; Harriet de Wit; K Luan Phan Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Kristina L Bell; Juliann B Purcell; Nathaniel G Harnett; Adam M Goodman; Sylvie Mrug; Mark A Schuster; Marc N Elliott; Susan Tortolero Emery; David C Knight Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2021-05-15 Impact factor: 3.708