Literature DB >> 25563078

Analysis of discordant Affymetrix probesets casts serious doubt on idea of microarray data reutilization.

Andrey Marakhonov, Nataliya Sadovskaya, Ivan Antonov, Ancha Baranova, Mikhail Skoblov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Affymetrix microarray technology allows one to investigate expression of thousands of genes simultaneously upon a variety of conditions. In a popular U133A microarray platform, the expression of 37% of genes is measured by more than one probeset. The discordant expression observed for two different probesets that match the same gene is a widespread phenomenon which is usually underestimated, ignored or disregarded.
RESULTS: Here we evaluate the prevalence of discordant expression in data collected using Affymetrix HG-U133A microarray platform. In U133A, about 30% of genes annotated by two different probesets demonstrate a substantial correlation between independently measured expression values. To our surprise, sorting the probesets according to the nature of the discrepancy in their expression levels allowed the classification of the respective genes according to their fundamental functional properties, including observed enrichment by tissue-specific transcripts and alternatively spliced variants. On another hand, an absence of discrepancies in probesets that simultaneously match several different genes allowed us to pinpoint non-expressed pseudogenes and gene groups with highly correlated expression patterns. Nevertheless, in many cases, the nature of discordant expression of two probesets that match the same transcript remains unexplained. It is possible that these probesets report differently regulated sets of transcripts, or, in best case scenario, two different sets of transcripts that represent the same gene.
CONCLUSION: The majority of absolute gene expression values collected using Affymetrix microarrays may not be suitable for typical interpretative downstream analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25563078      PMCID: PMC4303952          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-S12-S8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


  37 in total

1.  Effects of aging on mRNA profiles for drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters in livers of male and female mice.

Authors:  Zidong Donna Fu; Iván L Csanaky; Curtis D Klaassen
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.922

2.  Probabilistic analysis of probe reliability in differential gene expression studies with short oligonucleotide arrays.

Authors:  Leo Lahti; Laura L Elo; Tero Aittokallio; Samuel Kaski
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Specific expression of GPR56 by human cytotoxic lymphocytes.

Authors:  Yen-Ming Peng; Martijn D B van de Garde; Kai-Fong Cheng; Paul A Baars; Ester B M Remmerswaal; René A W van Lier; Charles R Mackay; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Jörg Hamann
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 4.  Reuse of public genome-wide gene expression data.

Authors:  Johan Rung; Alvis Brazma
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Coexpression network analysis identifies transcriptional modules related to proastrocytic differentiation and sprouty signaling in glioma.

Authors:  Alexander E Ivliev; Peter A C 't Hoen; Marina G Sergeeva
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Essential role of Rip2 in the modulation of innate and adaptive immunity triggered by Nod1 and Nod2 ligands.

Authors:  Joao G Magalhaes; Jooeun Lee; Kaoru Geddes; Stephen Rubino; Dana J Philpott; Stephen E Girardin
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  A survey of spatial defects in Homo Sapiens Affymetrix GeneChips.

Authors:  W B Langdon; G J G Upton; Renata da Silva Camargo; Andrew P Harrison
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Large-scale prediction of long non-coding RNA functions in a coding-non-coding gene co-expression network.

Authors:  Qi Liao; Changning Liu; Xiongying Yuan; Shuli Kang; Ruoyu Miao; Hui Xiao; Guoguang Zhao; Haitao Luo; Dechao Bu; Haitao Zhao; Geir Skogerbø; Zhongdao Wu; Yi Zhao
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Expression of distinct RNAs from 3' untranslated regions.

Authors:  Tim R Mercer; Dagmar Wilhelm; Marcel E Dinger; Giulia Soldà; Darren J Korbie; Evgeny A Glazov; Vy Truong; Maren Schwenke; Cas Simons; Klaus I Matthaei; Robert Saint; Peter Koopman; John S Mattick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Jetset: selecting the optimal microarray probe set to represent a gene.

Authors:  Qiyuan Li; Nicolai J Birkbak; Balazs Gyorffy; Zoltan Szallasi; Aron C Eklund
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Don't go in circles: confounding factors in gene expression profiling.

Authors:  John Toubia; Vanessa M Conn; Simon J Conn
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Quantitative Variation in m.3243A > G Mutation Produce Discrete Changes in Energy Metabolism.

Authors:  Ryan P McMillan; Sidney Stewart; James A Budnick; Clayton C Caswell; Matthew W Hulver; Konark Mukherjee; Sarika Srivastava
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.