Literature DB >> 25562462

Initial response as a predictor of 12-week buprenorphine-naloxone treatment response in a prescription opioid-dependent population.

Katherine A McDermott1, Margaret L Griffin, Hilary S Connery, E Yvette Hilario, David A Fiellin, Garrett M Fitzmaurice, Roger D Weiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Initial medication response has been shown to predict treatment outcome across a variety of substance use disorders, but no studies have examined the predictive power of initial response to buprenorphine-naloxone in the treatment of prescription opioid dependence. We therefore conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Prescription Opioid Addiction Treatment Study to determine whether initial response to buprenorphine-naloxone predicted 12-week treatment outcome in a prescription opioid-dependent population.
METHOD: Using data from a multisite, randomized controlled trial of buprenorphine-naloxone plus counseling for DSM-IV prescription opioid dependence (June 2006-July 2009), we conducted a secondary analysis to investigate the relationship between initial medication response and 12-week treatment outcome to establish how soon the efficacy of buprenorphine-naloxone could be predicted (N = 360). Outcomes were determined from the Substance Use Report, a self-report measure of substance use, and confirmatory urinalysis. Predictive values were calculated to determine the importance of abstinence versus use at various time points within the first month of treatment (week 1, weeks 1-2, 1-3, or 1-4) in predicting successful versus unsuccessful treatment outcome (based on abstinence or near-abstinence from opioids) in the last 4 weeks of buprenorphine-naloxone treatment (weeks 9-12).
RESULTS: Outcome was best predicted by medication response after 2 weeks of treatment. Two weeks of initial abstinence was moderately predictive of treatment success (positive predictive value = 71%), while opioid use in both of the first 2 weeks was strongly predictive of unsuccessful treatment outcome (negative predictive value [NPV] = 84%), especially when successful outcome was defined as total abstinence from opioids in weeks 9-12 (NPV = 94%).
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating prescription opioid-dependent patients after 2 weeks of buprenorphine-naloxone treatment may help determine the likelihood of successful outcome at completion of the current treatment regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00316277. © Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25562462      PMCID: PMC4352119          DOI: 10.4088/JCP.14m09096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  32 in total

1.  Identifying methadone maintenance clients at risk for poor treatment response: pretreatment and early progress indicators.

Authors:  A R Morral; M A Belding; M Y Iguchi
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Reanalysis of methamphetamine dependence treatment trial.

Authors:  Celia Winchell; Bob A Rappaport; Rigoberto Roca; Curtis J Rosebraugh
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.243

3.  Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Madhukar H Trivedi; A John Rush; Stephen R Wisniewski; Andrew A Nierenberg; Diane Warden; Louise Ritz; Grayson Norquist; Robert H Howland; Barry Lebowitz; Patrick J McGrath; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Melanie M Biggs; G K Balasubramani; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Non-medical use, abuse and dependence on prescription opioids among U.S. adults: psychiatric, medical and substance use correlates.

Authors:  William C Becker; Lynn E Sullivan; Jeanette M Tetrault; Rani A Desai; David A Fiellin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Early response to antipsychotic drug therapy as a clinical marker of subsequent response in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Bruce J Kinon; Lei Chen; Haya Ascher-Svanum; Virginia L Stauffer; Sara Kollack-Walker; Wei Zhou; Shitij Kapur; John M Kane
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Predictors of attrition with buprenorphine/naloxone treatment in opioid dependent youth.

Authors:  Diane Warden; Geetha A Subramaniam; Thomas Carmody; George E Woody; Abu Minhajuddin; Sabrina A Poole; Jennifer Potter; Marc Fishman; Michael Bogenschutz; Ashwin Patkar; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Retention rate and substance use in methadone and buprenorphine maintenance therapy and predictors of outcome: results from a randomized study.

Authors:  Michael Soyka; Christina Zingg; Gabriele Koller; Heinrich Kuefner
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 5.176

8.  Effect of initial treatment with antidepressants as a predictor of outcome after 8 weeks.

Authors:  H P Volz; H Müller; Y Sturm; B Preussler; H J Möller
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Early abstinence in cocaine pharmacotherapy trials predicts successful treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer G Plebani; Kyle M Kampman; Kevin G Lynch
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2009-03-31

10.  Primary care office-based buprenorphine treatment: comparison of heroin and prescription opioid dependent patients.

Authors:  Brent A Moore; David A Fiellin; Declan T Barry; Lynn E Sullivan; Marek C Chawarski; Patrick G O'Connor; Richard S Schottenfeld
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  9 in total

1.  Correlates of Long-Term Opioid Abstinence After Randomization to Methadone Versus Buprenorphine/Naloxone in a Multi-Site Trial.

Authors:  Yuhui Zhu; Elizabeth A Evans; Larissa J Mooney; Andrew J Saxon; Annamarie Kelleghan; Caroline Yoo; Yih-Ing Hser
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  The Role of Behavioral Interventions in Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment: A Review.

Authors:  Kathleen M Carroll; Roger D Weiss
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Dropout in clinical trials of pharmacological treatment for methamphetamine dependence: the role of initial abstinence.

Authors:  Ryan Cook; Brendan Quinn; Keith Heinzerling; Steve Shoptaw
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Predictors of early dropout in outpatient buprenorphine/naloxone treatment.

Authors:  David E Marcovitz; R Kathryn McHugh; Julie Volpe; Victoria Votaw; Hilary S Connery
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2016-07-21

Review 5.  Dependence on Prescription Opioids.

Authors:  Johannes Just; Martin Mücke; Markus Bleckwenn
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 6.  Prescription Opioid Misuse, Abuse, and Treatment in the United States: An Update.

Authors:  Kathleen T Brady; Jenna L McCauley; Sudie E Back
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 7.  The changing opioid crisis: development, challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 15.992

8.  Measurement-based care using DSM-5 for opioid use disorder: can we make opioid medication treatment more effective?

Authors:  John Marsden; Betty Tai; Robert Ali; Lian Hu; A John Rush; Nora Volkow
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  The Prescription Opioid Addiction Treatment Study: What have we learned.

Authors:  Roger D Weiss; Vinod Rao
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.492

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.