Andrew C Strine1, Rosalia Misseri2, Konrad M Szymanski2, Martin Kaefer2, Audrey C Rhee2, Kate Hillier2, Richard C Rink2, Mark P Cain2. 1. Division of Pediatric Urology, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: astrine@iupui.edu. 2. Division of Pediatric Urology, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate health related benefit in children undergoing surgical reconstruction for urinary and fecal incontinence from a parental perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A health related benefit instrument was mailed to the parents or guardians of 300 consecutive patients who had undergone reconstruction for urinary and/or fecal incontinence at our institution between 1997 and 2011. We assessed parent reported health related benefit using the validated Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory and satisfaction with 6 supplemental questions. One-sample t-tests as well as exploratory univariate and multivariate linear regressions were performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Response rate was 40.0% at a mean of 5.5 years (range 0.6 to 13.8) after reconstruction. Spina bifida was the most common primary diagnosis (48 patients, 56.5%). Mean total Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory score and subscores for each domain were positive, indicating an improved health related benefit after reconstruction (all p <0.0001). Certain patients, possibly based on diagnosis and gender, may particularly benefit from reconstruction (p ≤0.04). Parents believed that the bladder augmentation and/or urinary continent catheterizable channel most changed the life of their child but that achievement of stool continence was most important to themselves. Only 17 families (16.2%) required more than 1 month to become comfortable with catheterizations, and 69 patients (68.8%) required less care or no assistance with daily activities after reconstruction. Only 2 parents (1.9%) would be unwilling to consent to the procedure again. CONCLUSIONS: We observed moderate parental satisfaction and parent reported improvement in health related quality of life for children undergoing surgical reconstruction for urinary and fecal incontinence.
PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate health related benefit in children undergoing surgical reconstruction for urinary and fecal incontinence from a parental perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A health related benefit instrument was mailed to the parents or guardians of 300 consecutive patients who had undergone reconstruction for urinary and/or fecal incontinence at our institution between 1997 and 2011. We assessed parent reported health related benefit using the validated Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory and satisfaction with 6 supplemental questions. One-sample t-tests as well as exploratory univariate and multivariate linear regressions were performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Response rate was 40.0% at a mean of 5.5 years (range 0.6 to 13.8) after reconstruction. Spina bifida was the most common primary diagnosis (48 patients, 56.5%). Mean total Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory score and subscores for each domain were positive, indicating an improved health related benefit after reconstruction (all p <0.0001). Certain patients, possibly based on diagnosis and gender, may particularly benefit from reconstruction (p ≤0.04). Parents believed that the bladder augmentation and/or urinary continent catheterizable channel most changed the life of their child but that achievement of stool continence was most important to themselves. Only 17 families (16.2%) required more than 1 month to become comfortable with catheterizations, and 69 patients (68.8%) required less care or no assistance with daily activities after reconstruction. Only 2 parents (1.9%) would be unwilling to consent to the procedure again. CONCLUSIONS: We observed moderate parental satisfaction and parent reported improvement in health related quality of life for children undergoing surgical reconstruction for urinary and fecal incontinence.
Authors: Bhalaajee Meenakshi-Sundaram; Caitlin T Coco; James R Furr; Byron P Dubow; Christopher E Aston; Jennifer Lewis; Gennady Slobodov; Bradley P Kropp; Dominic C Frimberger Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 7.600