Literature DB >> 25562199

Robustness of equations that define molecular subtypes of glioblastoma tumors based on five transcripts measured by RT-PCR.

Xavier Castells1, Juan José Acebes, Carles Majós, Susana Boluda, Margarida Julià-Sapé, Ana Paula Candiota, Joaquín Ariño, Anna Barceló, Carles Arús.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma (Gb) is one of the most deadly tumors. Its molecular subtypes are yet to be fully characterized while the attendant efforts for personalized medicine need to be intensified in relation to glioblastoma diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Several molecular signatures based on gene expression microarrays were reported, but the use of microarrays for routine clinical practice is challenged by attendant economic costs. Several authors have proposed discriminant equations based on RT-PCR. Still, the discriminant threshold is often incompletely described, which makes proper validation difficult. In a previous work, we have reported two Gb subtypes based on the expression levels of four genes: CHI3L1, LDHA, LGALS1, and IGFBP3. One Gb subtype presented with low expression of the four genes mentioned, and of MGMT in a large portion of the patients (with anticipated high methylation of its promoter), and mutated IDH1. Here, we evaluate the robustness of the equations fitted with these genes using RT-PCR values in a set of 64 cases and importantly, define an unequivocal discriminant threshold with a view to prognostic implications. We developed two approaches to generate the discriminant equations: 1) using the expression level of the four genes mentioned above, and 2) using those genes displaying the highest correlation with survival among the aforementioned four ones, plus MGMT, as an attempt to further reduce the number of genes. The ease of equations' applicability, reduction in cost for raw data, and robustness in terms of resampling-based classification accuracy warrant further evaluation of these equations to discern Gb tumor biopsy heterogeneity at molecular level, diagnose potential malignancy, and prognosis of individual patients with glioblastomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25562199      PMCID: PMC4281848          DOI: 10.1089/omi.2014.0077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  21 in total

1.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias.

Authors:  B M Bolstad; R A Irizarry; M Astrand; T P Speed
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Gene expression profiling of gliomas strongly predicts survival.

Authors:  William A Freije; F Edmundo Castro-Vargas; Zixing Fang; Steve Horvath; Timothy Cloughesy; Linda M Liau; Paul S Mischel; Stanley F Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Development of a predictor for human brain tumors based on gene expression values obtained from two types of microarray technologies.

Authors:  Xavier Castells; Juan José Acebes; Susana Boluda; Angel Moreno-Torres; Jesús Pujol; Margarida Julià-Sapé; Ana Paula Candiota; Joaquín Ariño; Anna Barceló; Carles Arús
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2010-04

4.  A 4-gene signature associated with clinical outcome in high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Marie de Tayrac; Marc Aubry; Stephan Saïkali; Amandine Etcheverry; Cyrille Surbled; Frédérique Guénot; Marie-Dominique Galibert; Abderrahmane Hamlat; Thierry Lesimple; Véronique Quillien; Philippe Menei; Jean Mosser
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Gene expression signature-based prognostic risk score in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Atsushi Kawaguchi; Naoki Yajima; Naoto Tsuchiya; Jumpei Homma; Masakazu Sano; Manabu Natsumeda; Hitoshi Takahashi; Yukihiko Fujii; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Ryuya Yamanaka
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 6.716

6.  A multigene predictor of outcome in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Howard Colman; Li Zhang; Erik P Sulman; J Matthew McDonald; Nasrin Latif Shooshtari; Andreana Rivera; Sonya Popoff; Catherine L Nutt; David N Louis; J Gregory Cairncross; Mark R Gilbert; Heidi S Phillips; Minesh P Mehta; Arnab Chakravarti; Christopher E Pelloski; Krishna Bhat; Burt G Feuerstein; Robert B Jenkins; Ken Aldape
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Integrated array-comparative genomic hybridization and expression array profiles identify clinically relevant molecular subtypes of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Janice M Nigro; Anjan Misra; Li Zhang; Ivan Smirnov; Howard Colman; Chandi Griffin; Natalie Ozburn; Mingang Chen; Edward Pan; Dimpy Koul; W K Alfred Yung; Burt G Feuerstein; Kenneth D Aldape
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Unsupervised analysis of transcriptomic profiles reveals six glioma subtypes.

Authors:  Aiguo Li; Jennifer Walling; Susie Ahn; Yuri Kotliarov; Qin Su; Martha Quezado; J Carl Oberholtzer; John Park; Jean C Zenklusen; Howard A Fine
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  A fourteen gene GBM prognostic signature identifies association of immune response pathway and mesenchymal subtype with high risk group.

Authors:  Arivazhagan Arimappamagan; Kumaravel Somasundaram; Kandavel Thennarasu; Sreekanthreddy Peddagangannagari; Harish Srinivasan; Bangalore C Shailaja; Cini Samuel; Irene Rosita Pia Patric; Sudhanshu Shukla; Balaram Thota; Krishnarao Venkatesh Prasanna; Paritosh Pandey; Anandh Balasubramaniam; Vani Santosh; Bangalore Ashwathnarayanara Chandramouli; Alangar Sathyaranjandas Hegde; Paturu Kondaiah; Manchanahalli R Sathyanarayana Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies.

Authors:  X Castells; J J Acebes; C Majós; S Boluda; M Julià-Sapé; A P Candiota; J Ariño; A Barceló; C Arús
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  High CHI3L1 expression is associated with glioma patient survival.

Authors:  Giedrius Steponaitis; Daina Skiriutė; Arunas Kazlauskas; Ieva Golubickaitė; Rytis Stakaitis; Arimantas Tamašauskas; Paulina Vaitkienė
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.644

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.