| Literature DB >> 25561980 |
Jing Yan1, Yuan Zhou1, DaiXing Chen1, LiLi Li1, Xin Yang1, Yang You1, Xianlong Ling1.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells exhibit multidrug resistance (MDR), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Cancer cells that overexpress telomerase are resistant to chemotherapeutic drugs. This study aimed to determine the effects of mitochondrial translocation of telomerase on MDR in HCC cells. HepG2 cells were transfected with negative plasmid and PTPN11 (Shp-2) short hairpin RNA (ShRNA) plasmid to establish HepG2-negative (HepG2 transfected with negative plasmid) and HepG2-ShShp-2 (HepG2 transfected with Shp-2 ShRNA plasmid) cells. Sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs was assessed by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays. Distribution of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) within mitochondria was detected by western blotting and immunofluorescence combined with laser scanning confocal microscopy. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation was demonstrated by flow cytometry with the mitochondrial superoxide (Mito-Sox) indicator. The frequency of damaged mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was illustrated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR). Expression of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex subunits ND1 and COXII were also demonstrated by western blotting. Knockdown of Shp-2 in HepG2 cells resulted in upregulation of mitochondrial TERT expression and increased resistance to cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (resistance indices, 2.094 and 1.863, respectively). In addition, both the mitochondrial ROS and the frequency of mtDNA damage were decreased, and COXII expression was upregulated. Our results suggest that Mitochondrial translocation of hTERT may lead to chemotherapeutic resistance in HCC cells. Mitochondrial hTERT contributes to the drug resistance of tumor cells by reducing ROS production and mtDNA damage, and exerting a protective effect on the mitochondrial respiratory chain.Entities:
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma.; mitochondria; multidrug resistance; telomerase
Year: 2015 PMID: 25561980 PMCID: PMC4280398 DOI: 10.7150/jca.10419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Figure 1Suppression of Shp-2 by RNAi. (A) HepG2 cells were transfected with Shp-2 shRNA plasmids and control vectors, and then examined using immunofluorescence microscopy. (B) Shp-2 expression was detected by western blot assays. (C) The expression of Shp-2 in HepG2-shShp-2 cells was significantly inhibited compared with that in HepG2 and HepG2-negative cells (P<0.05).
Figure 2Shp-2 suppression increased mitochondrial translocation of hTERT. (A) Localization of hTERT in the mitochondria was analyzed using immunofluorescence assays. Mitochondria, red fluorescence; hTERT, green fluorescence. (B) Mitochondrial and cell hTERT expression was detected using western blot assays and quantified by densitometry. #P>0.05, HepG2-shShp-2 cells vs. HepG2 and HepG2-negative cells before treatment.*P<0.01, HepG2-shShp-2 vs. HepG2 and HepG2-negative cells after CDDP treatment. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Drug resistance detected by CCK-8 assay.
| Drug | HepG2 (IC50 µg/mL) | HepG2-Negative (IC50 µg/mL) | HepG2-ShShp-2 (IC50 µg/mL) | RI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDDP | 15.90±0.09 | 15.45±0.11 | 33.31±5.88* | 2.094 |
| 5-FU | 14.40±0.92 | 13.98±0.15 | 26.83±3.33* | 1.863 |
| DOX | 0.55±0.07 | 0.48±0.05 | 0.58±0.06 | 1.066 |
* P<0.05 vs HepG2 and HepG2-Negative cells. Data were represented as mean±standard deviation.
Figure 3Mitochondrial translocation of hTERT reduced ROS generation. (A) MitoSOX was detected using flow cytometry. (B) MitoSOX detected using flow cytometry was quantified.*P<0.05, HepG2-shShp-2 cells vs. HepG2 and HepG2-negative cells. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Amplification frequency of mtDNA measured by Q- PCR.
| Condition | HepG2 | HepG2-Negative | HepG2-ShShp-2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 1.00±0.12 | 1.04±0.11 | 0.92±0.24 |
| Drug treatment | 2.06±0.38 | 2.02±0.33 | 0.87±0.32# |
# P<0.05 vs HepG2 and HepG2-Negative cells. Data were represented as mean±standard deviation.
Figure 4ND1 and COXII expression in HepG2 cells before and after transfection with Shp-2 shRNA plasmids. (A) ND1 expression was detected by western blot assays. No changes in ND1 expression were found in the control or CDDP-treated groups (P>0.05). (B) COXII expression was detected by western blot assays. There was no significant difference in COXII expression between HepG2-shShp-2, HepG2, and HepG2-negative cells before CDDP treatment. However, after CDDP treatment, COX2 expression was significantly higher in HepG2-shShp-2 cells than in HepG2 and HepG2-negative cells. *P<0.05 vs. HepG2 and HepG2-negative cells after CDDP treatment. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.