| Literature DB >> 25561842 |
Abner Carvalho-Batista1, Mariana Negri2, Leonardo G Pileggi2, Antonio L Castilho3, Rogério C Costa1, Fernando L Mantelatto2.
Abstract
Artemesialonginaris is a marine shrimp endemic to the southwestern Atlantic and distributed from Atafona, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) to Rawson, Chubut (Argentina). In recent years, this species has become an important target of the commercial fishery as a consequence of the decline in the fishery of more traditional and profitable marine shrimps. In addition, phenotypic variations have been documented in populations along its distribution. Therefore, investigations on the genetics of the fishing stocks are necessary for the development of sustainable management strategies and for understanding the possible sources of these variations. The mitochondrial gene Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) was used to search for evidence of genetic structure among the populations of Artemesialonginaris and to analyze the phylogenetic relationships among them. A total of 60 specimens were collected from seven different localities, covering its geographical range. The final alignment showed 53 haplotypes (48 individuals and 5 shared), with no biogeographical pattern. The low genetic divergence found, with a non-significant FST value, also suggests the absence of population structure for this gene. These findings indicate a continuous gene flow among the populations analyzed, suggesting that the phenotypic variation is a consequence of different environmental conditions among the localities.Entities:
Keywords: Cytochrome Oxidase I; Penaeoidea; gene flow; phenotypic plasticity
Year: 2014 PMID: 25561842 PMCID: PMC4283376 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.457.6569
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
List of specimens used for molecular analysis with respective site of collection, catalogue numbers, and GenBank accession numbers of . The letters CCDB preceding the catalogue numbers represent the Crustacean Collection of the Department of Biology, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo.
| Locality | Catalogue numbers | GenBank Accession Numbers |
|---|---|---|
| Macaé-Rio de Janeiro, Brazil | CCDB 3782 | |
| Ubatuba-São Paulo, Brazil | CCDB 3806, 3429 | |
| Santos-São Paulo, Brazil | CCDB 4008 | |
| Cananéia-São Paulo, Brazil | CCDB 3655 | |
| São Francisco do Sul-Santa Catarina, Brazil | CCDB 3851 | |
| Rio Grande-Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil ( | CCDB 3928 | |
| Mar del Plata-Buenos Aires, Argentina ( | CCDB 869, 4150 |
Figure 1.Southwest Atlantic collection sites. Map showing the localities of the specimens of analyzed: 1 Macaé, Brazil 2 Ubatuba, Brazil 3 Santos, Brazil 4 Cananéia, Brazil 5 São Francisco do Sul, Brazil 6 Rio Grande, Brazil 7 Mar del Plata, Argentina. The gray band indicates the complete geographical distribution of .
Average distance (%) among individuals ± standard deviation in each locality.
| Locality | Average distance (%) | Standard deviation (±) |
|---|---|---|
| Macaé | 1.42 | 0.24 |
| Ubatuba | 1.07 | 0.19 |
| Santos | 1.25 | 0.43 |
| Cananéia | 0.81 | 0.25 |
| São Francisco do Sul | 1.37 | 0.26 |
| Rio Grande | 1.08 | 0.19 |
| Mar del Plata | 0.88 | 0.21 |
Average distance (%) among localities (numbers on bottom) ± standard deviation (values on top).
| Locality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.19 | ||
| 1.21 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.17 | ||
| 1.30 | 1.08 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | ||
| 1.17 | 0.95 | 0.78 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.19 | ||
| 1.37 | 1.21 | 1.13 | 1.02 | 0.19 | 0.20 | ||
| 1.20 | 1.04 | 1.13 | 0.96 | 1.20 | 0.17 | ||
| 1.16 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.83 | 1.11 | 0.95 |
Figure 2.Dendrogram based on Neighbor-Joining distance method of COI gene sequences of individuals of . Localities represent the analyzed specimens. Numbers are bootstrap support values (1000 replicates); values below 50% are not shown.
Figure 3.Phylogram for individuals of inferred from Maximum Likelihood analysis of COI gene sequences. Localities represent analyzed specimens. Numbers are bootstrap support values (1000 replicates); values below 50% are not shown.
Number of individuals sampled, number of haplotypes, D.H. = haplotype diversity, and D.N. ± D.P. = nucleotide diversity ± standard deviation for each locality.
| Locality | Number of samples | Number of haplotypes | D. H. | D. N. ± D. P. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macaé | 10 | 10 | 0.10 | 1.38×10-3 ± 0.79×10-3 |
| Ubatuba | 13 | 13 | 0.08 | 1.05×10-3 ± 0.4×10-3 |
| Santos | 2 | 2 | ||
| Cananéia | 5 | 5 | 0.20 | 0.80×10-3 ± 0.5×10-3 |
| São Francisco do Sul | 9 | 9 | 0.11 | 1.34×10-3 ± 0.8×10-3 |
| Rio Grande | 10 | 9 | 0.12 | 1.05×10-3 ± 0.6×10-3 |
| Mar del Plata | 11 | 11 | 0.91 | 0.87×10-3 ± 0.5×10-3 |
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) performed with specimens of obtained from seven localities. *Significant values, P < 0.05.
| Structure | Variation Source | % | Fixation index | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absent | Among localities | -1.80 | FST: -0.02 | 0.95 |
| Within localities | 101.80 |
Figure 4.Haplotype network of according to Median-Joining analysis. Each circle represent one haplotype found in the localities (53 haplotypes in 60 specimens). The size of the circle of each haplotype is proportional to its frequency in the sample. Each small dash represents a mutational step.