Literature DB >> 25561725

Structure of neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1 (NBL1): insights for the functional variability across bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) antagonists.

Kristof Nolan1, Chandramohan Kattamuri1, David M Luedeke1, Elizabeth B Angerman1, Scott A Rankin2, Mariana L Stevens2, Aaron M Zorn2, Thomas B Thompson3.   

Abstract

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are antagonized through the action of numerous extracellular protein antagonists, including members from the differential screening-selected gene aberrative in neuroblastoma (DAN) family. In vivo, misregulation of the balance between BMP signaling and DAN inhibition can lead to numerous disease states, including cancer, kidney nephropathy, and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Despite this importance, very little information is available describing how DAN family proteins effectively inhibit BMP ligands. Furthermore, our understanding for how differences in individual DAN family members arise, including affinity and specificity, remains underdeveloped. Here, we present the structure of the founding member of the DAN family, neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1 (NBL1). Comparing NBL1 to the structure of protein related to Dan and Cerberus (PRDC), a more potent BMP antagonist within the DAN family, a number of differences were identified. Through a mutagenesis-based approach, we were able to correlate the BMP binding epitope in NBL1 with that in PRDC, where introduction of specific PRDC amino acids in NBL1 (A58F and S67Y) correlated with a gain-of-function inhibition toward BMP2 and BMP7, but not GDF5. Although NBL1(S67Y) was able to antagonize BMP7 as effectively as PRDC, NBL1(S67Y) was still 32-fold weaker than PRDC against BMP2. Taken together, this data suggests that alterations in the BMP binding epitope can partially account for differences in the potency of BMP inhibition within the DAN family.
© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP); Differential Screening-aberrative in Neuroblastoma (DAN); Extracellular Antagonism; Mutagenesis; Neuroblastoma Suppressor of Tumorigenicity 1 (NBL1); Protein Related to Dan and Cerberus (PRDC); SOST; Structural Biology; Transforming Growth Factor β(TGF-B); X-ray Crystallography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25561725      PMCID: PMC4335214          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.628412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  40 in total

1.  Heparin and activin-binding determinants in follistatin and FSTL3.

Authors:  Yisrael Sidis; Alan L Schneyer; Henry T Keutmann
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  The structure of the follistatin:activin complex reveals antagonism of both type I and type II receptor binding.

Authors:  Thomas B Thompson; Thomas F Lerch; Robert W Cook; Teresa K Woodruff; Theodore S Jardetzky
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  The genomic analysis of human DAN gene.

Authors:  T Ozaki; H Enomoto; Y Nakamura; K Kondo; N Seki; M Ohira; N Nomura; M Ohki; A Nakagawara; S Sakiyama
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.311

Review 4.  The DAN family: modulators of TGF-β signaling and beyond.

Authors:  Kristof Nolan; Thomas B Thompson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Members of the DAN family are BMP antagonists that form highly stable noncovalent dimers.

Authors:  Chandramohan Kattamuri; David M Luedeke; Kristof Nolan; Scott A Rankin; Kenneth D Greis; Aaron M Zorn; Thomas B Thompson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Dorsal-ventral patterning and neural induction in Xenopus embryos.

Authors:  Edward M De Robertis; Hiroki Kuroda
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 13.827

7.  Crystal structure analysis reveals how the Chordin family member crossveinless 2 blocks BMP-2 receptor binding.

Authors:  Jin-Li Zhang; Li-Yan Qiu; Alexander Kotzsch; Stella Weidauer; Lucy Patterson; Matthias Hammerschmidt; Walter Sebald; Thomas D Mueller
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 12.270

8.  Characterization of wise protein and its molecular mechanism to interact with both Wnt and BMP signals.

Authors:  Katherine B Lintern; Sonia Guidato; Alison Rowe; José W Saldanha; Nobue Itasaki
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  DAN gene product has an affinity for Ni2+.

Authors:  K Kondo; T Ozaki; Y Nakamura; S Sakiyama
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1995-11-02       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Gremlin-1 associates with fibrillin microfibrils in vivo and regulates mesothelioma cell survival through transcription factor slug.

Authors:  J A Tamminen; V Parviainen; M Rönty; A P Wohl; L Murray; S Joenväärä; M Varjosalo; O Leppäranta; O Ritvos; G Sengle; R Renkonen; M Myllärniemi; K Koli
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 7.485

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Structural Biology and Evolution of the TGF-β Family.

Authors:  Andrew P Hinck; Thomas D Mueller; Timothy A Springer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  Agonists and Antagonists of TGF-β Family Ligands.

Authors:  Chenbei Chang
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Analysis and identification of the Grem2 heparin/heparan sulfate-binding motif.

Authors:  Chandramohan Kattamuri; Kristof Nolan; Thomas B Thompson
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1 is a circulating protein associated with progression to end-stage kidney disease in diabetes.

Authors:  Hiroki Kobayashi; Helen C Looker; Eiichiro Satake; Francesca D'Addio; Jonathan M Wilson; Pierre Jean Saulnier; Zaipul I Md Dom; Kristina O'Neil; Katsuhito Ihara; Bozena Krolewski; Hannah S Badger; Adriana Petrazzuolo; Domenico Corradi; Andrzej Galecki; Parker C Wilson; Behzad Najafian; Michael Mauer; Monika A Niewczas; Alessandro Doria; Benjamin D Humphreys; Kevin L Duffin; Paolo Fiorina; Robert G Nelson; Andrzej S Krolewski
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 19.319

5.  Structure of Gremlin-2 in Complex with GDF5 Gives Insight into DAN-Family-Mediated BMP Antagonism.

Authors:  Kristof Nolan; Chandramohan Kattamuri; Scott A Rankin; Randy J Read; Aaron M Zorn; Thomas B Thompson
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  New Ligand Binding Function of Human Cerberus and Role of Proteolytic Processing in Regulating Ligand-Receptor Interactions and Antagonist Activity.

Authors:  Senem Aykul; Erik Martinez-Hackert
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  BMP Antagonist Gremlin 2 Limits Inflammation After Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Lehanna N Sanders; John A Schoenhard; Mohamed A Saleh; Amrita Mukherjee; Sergey Ryzhov; William G McMaster; Kristof Nolan; Richard J Gumina; Thomas B Thompson; Mark A Magnuson; David G Harrison; Antonis K Hatzopoulos
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 8.  Structural perspective of BMP ligands and signaling.

Authors:  Gregory R Gipson; Erich J Goebel; Kaitlin N Hart; Emily C Kappes; Chandramohan Kattamuri; Jason C McCoy; Thomas B Thompson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  The sclerostin-neutralizing antibody AbD09097 recognizes an epitope adjacent to sclerostin's binding site for the Wnt co-receptor LRP6.

Authors:  V Boschert; C Frisch; J W Back; K van Pee; S E Weidauer; E-M Muth; P Schmieder; M Beerbaum; A Knappik; P Timmerman; T D Mueller
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.411

10.  Structure of Gremlin-1 and analysis of its interaction with BMP-2.

Authors:  Miglė Kišonaitė; Xuelu Wang; Marko Hyvönen
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.