Literature DB >> 25561700

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a straight intramedullary nail.

Julien Lucas Y Hernandez1, Julien Abad2, Stanislas Remy3, Veronique Darcel4, Dominique Chauveaux2, Olivier Laffenetre5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is a proven solution for severe hindfoot arthropathy that reestablishes stability for plantigrade gait and alleviates pain, while correcting deformity. Intramedullary nailing is an effective option for fixation. The aim of this study was to determine clinical outcome, analyze the fusion rate, and determine final hindfoot alignment in a consecutive series of patients using a single-design straight intramedullary nail.
METHODS: This study evaluated 63 patients treated between 2006 and 2010 with at least 36 months of follow-up. Ten patients were excluded because of study inclusion criteria, and 4 were lost to follow-up, leaving 49 patients available for review. The average follow-up was 70.7 ± 15.1 months.
RESULTS: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved from 29.7 ± 15.1 before arthrodesis to 65.8 ± 14.6 after (P < .001) with 83.7% (41/49) of patients stating they were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome. The hindfoot angle improved from -3 ± 15 degrees (varus) before the arthrodesis to 3.5 ± 4 degrees (valgus) after; the tibiotalar angle averaged 103 ± 4.2 degrees after the arthrodesis. Fusion occurred in both joints in 86% (42/49) of patients and in 93% (91/98) of all joints. The average time to fusion was 4.5 ± 2 months. Current smokers had a significantly (P = .03) higher risk of complications. Use of an allograft, with or without bone morphogenetic protein 2, led to comparable results even in the presence of a large bone defect.
CONCLUSION: These results are comparable to previously published studies using intramedullary nailing to achieve tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. The complication concerns typically associated with straight nails were not found. We recommend using a retrograde intramedullary nail for the fixation of TTC arthrodesis and adding an allograft in cases of significant bone loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, consecutive case series.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle joint; fusion; intramedullary nailing; subtalar joint

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25561700     DOI: 10.1177/1071100714565900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

Review 1.  The role of biologic in foot and ankle trauma-a review of the literature.

Authors:  Emily Zhao; Dwayne Carney; Monique Chambers; Samuel Ewalefo; MaCalus Hogan
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

Review 2.  [Arthroscopic tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis].

Authors:  S F Baumbach; M Braunstein; F Maßen; M Regauer; W Mutschler; W Böcker; H Polzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail: a prospective cohort study at a minimum five year follow-up.

Authors:  Adolfo Perez-Aznar; Blanca Gonzalez-Navarro; Laiz L Bello-Tejeda; Carolina Alonso-Montero; Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Re-arthrodesis after primary ankle fusion: 134/1,716 cases from the Swedish Ankle Registry.

Authors:  Anders Henricson; Lars Jehpsson; Åke Carlsson; Björn E Rosengren
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Evaluating Prospective Patient-Reported Pain and Function Outcomes After Ankle and Hindfoot Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Manish P Mehta; Mitesh P Mehta; Alain E Sherman; Muhammad Y Mutawakkil; Raheem Bell; Milap S Patel; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2021-10-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.