Literature DB >> 25560604

Serosal surfaces, mucin pools, and deposits, oh my: challenges in staging colorectal carcinoma.

Wendy L Frankel1, Ming Jin1.   

Abstract

Colorectal carcinoma is the third most common cancer in the United States. Proper and standardized pathologic staging is vital for prognostic assessment and impacts therapeutic decisions. The Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system was developed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) to be a data-driven, evidence-based staging system providing an accurate prediction of outcome. The AJCC 7th edition (2010) included several changes clarifying some issues and leading to new controversies. We aim to address selected challenging issues in tumor T staging, neoadjuvant treatment effects in rectal cancer, and definition of lymph node vs tumor deposit. Serosal involvement in colorectal cancer is staged as T4, which is associated with decreased survival and may impact additional therapy decisions. Although careful sampling and sectioning are helpful, challenges remain in interpretation of tumor within 1 mm of serosal surface with a reaction. Elastic stain as a surrogate marker for serosal invasion has been studied, but its usefulness remains unclear. Some unique issues in rectal cancer include the presence of serosa in proximal but not in distal tumors and post-neoadjuvant effects. Tumor should be staged based on tumor cells rather than acellular mucin pools. Additionally, tumor response should be graded only in primary tumor but not in lymph nodes or metastatic sites. The distinction between tumor deposits and lymph nodes has been modified in AJCC TNM from using size in the 5th edition, to the round contour in the 6th edition, to only features of residual lymph node architecture in the 7th edition. Interobserver variability remains but tumor deposits should be documented when present. The number of deposits should not be added to the total number of positive lymph nodes, and the N1c designation should only be used in cases without any positive lymph nodes. Future clarification will likely evolve as more data become available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25560604     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  11 in total

Review 1.  Pathologic assessment of gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Reetesh K Pai; Rish K Pai
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Prognostic value of tumor deposits in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Hang Zheng; Jixin Zhang; Yucun Liu; Xin Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.

Authors:  Vahan Kepenekian; Aditi Bhatt; Julien Péron; Mohammad Alyami; Nazim Benzerdjeb; Naoual Bakrin; Claire Falandry; Guillaume Passot; Pascal Rousset; Olivier Glehen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 65.011

Review 4.  Assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark L H Ong; John B Schofield
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-27

5.  Interobserver, intraobserver, and interlaboratory variability in reporting pT4a colon cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte E L Klaver; Nicole Bulkmans; Paul Drillenburg; Heike I Grabsch; Nicole C T van Grieken; Arend Karrenbeld; Lianne Koens; Ineke van Lijnschoten; Jos Meijer; Iris D Nagtegaal; Xavier Sagaert; Kees Seldenrijk; M F van Velthuysen; Annette H Bruggink; Pieter J Tanis; Petur Snaebjornsson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  A Modified Pathological N Stage Including Status of Tumor Deposits in Colorectal Cancer With Nodal Metastasis.

Authors:  Jun-Peng Pei; Chun-Dong Zhang; Yu Liang; Cheng Zhang; Kun-Zhe Wu; Yong-Zhi Li; Zhe-Ming Zhao; Dong-Qiu Dai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  How Best to Play the Role of Tumor Deposits in Stage III Colon Cancer?

Authors:  Yunxiao Liu; Hao Zhang; Yuliuming Wang; Chunlin Wang; Huan Xiong; Yang Wang; Haoyu Jing; Xia Jiang; Hanqing Hu; Qingchao Tang; Guiyu Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  The unique prognostic characteristics of tumor deposits in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Fangqi Liu; Jiang Zhao; Cong Li; Yuchen Wu; Wang Song; Tianan Guo; Shiqing Chen; Sanjun Cai; Dan Huang; Ye Xu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

9.  Extramural vascular invasion detected by contrast-enhanced multiple-row detectors computed tomography (ceMDCT) as a predictor of synchronous metastases in colon cancer.

Authors:  Su-Xing Yang; Xun Yao; Xing-He Song; Yan-Cheng Cui; Ying-Jiang Ye; Yi Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-25

10.  Prognostic and staging value of tumor deposits in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Tianlei Xu; Zhuo Yu; Qian Zhang; Botao Liu; Yuanxin Li; Feng Wang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.