Literature DB >> 25560434

Keeping primary care "in the loop": General practitioners want better communication with specialists and hospitals when caring for people diagnosed with cancer.

Natalia Lizama1, Claire E Johnson, Manonita Ghosh, Neeraj Garg, Jonathan D Emery, Christobel Saunders.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate general practitioners' (GP) perceptions about communication when providing cancer care.
METHODS: A self-report survey, which included an open response section, was mailed to a random sample of 1969 eligible Australian GPs. Content analysis of open response comments pertaining to communication was undertaken in order to ascertain GPs' views about communication issues in the provision of cancer care.
RESULTS: Of the 648 GPs who completed the survey, 68 (10%) included open response comments about interprofessional communication. Participants who commented on communication were a median age of 50 years and worked 33 h/week; 28% were male and 59% practiced in the metropolitan area. Comments pertaining to communication were coded using five non-mutually exclusive categories: being kept in the loop; continuity of care; relationships with specialists; positive communication experiences; and strategies for improving communication.GPs repeatedly noted the importance of receiving detailed and timely communication from specialists and hospitals, particularly in relation to patients' treatment regimes and follow-up care. Several GPs remarked that they were left out of "the information loop" and that patients were "lost" or "dumped" after referral.
CONCLUSION: While many GPs are currently involved in some aspects of cancer management, detailed and timely communication between specialists and GPs is imperative to support shared care and ensure optimal patient outcomes. This research highlights the need for established channels of communication between specialist and primary care medicine to support greater involvement by GPs in cancer care.
© 2015 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; delivery of health care; general practitioner; interprofessional relations; primary health care.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25560434     DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1743-7555            Impact factor:   2.601


  9 in total

Review 1.  The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Judith A Meiklejohn; Alexander Mimery; Jennifer H Martin; Ross Bailie; Gail Garvey; Euan T Walpole; Jon Adams; Daniel Williamson; Patricia C Valery
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Feasibility and acceptability of follow-up for prostate cancer in primary care: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marianne Heins; François Schellevis; Mirjam Schotman; Bart van Bezooijen; Ismene Tchaoussoglou; Mirjam van der Waart; Lilan Veldhuis; Sandra van Dulmen; Gé Donker; Joke Korevaar
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2018-12-12

3.  Assessing suitability for long-term colorectal cancer shared care: a scenario-based qualitative study.

Authors:  Kylie Vuong; Kerry Uebel; Maria Agaliotis; Stella Jun; Jane Taggart; Sue Suchy; Winston Liauw; Melvin Chin; Kate Webber; Mark Harris
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Roles and recommendations from primary care physicians towards managing low-risk breast cancer survivors in a shared-care model with specialists in Singapore-a qualitative study.

Authors:  Rose Wai-Yee Fok; Lian Leng Low; Hui Min Joanne Quah; Farhad Vasanwala; Sher Guan Low; Ling Ling Soh; Farid Mohamad; Kiley Wei-Jen Loh; Yoke Lim Soong; Yu Ke; Alexandre Chan; Ngiap-Chuan Tan
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anne Nicolaisen; Gitte Bruun Lauridsen; Peter Haastrup; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Effectiveness of a specialist palliative home care nurse-patient consultation followed by an interprofessional telephone case conference compared with usual care among patients with non-oncological palliative care needs: protocol for the multicentre KOPAL cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gabriella Marx; Tina Mallon; Nadine Janis Pohontsch; Franziska Schade; Judith Dams; Manuel Zimansky; Thomas Asendorf; Silke Böttcher; Christiane A Mueller; Michael Freitag; Eva Hummers; Hendrik van den Bussche; Ingmar Schäfer; Hans-Helmut König; Stephanie Stiel; Nils Schneider; Friedemann Nauck; Tim Friede; Martin Scherer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Exploring healthcare providers' perceptions regarding the prevention and treatment of chronic pain in breast cancer survivors: A qualitative analysis among different disciplines.

Authors:  Yaël Slaghmuylder; Peter Pype; Ann Van Hecke; Emelien Lauwerier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tiffany Sandell; Heike Schütze
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 9.  Integrated care for resected early stage lung cancer: innovations and exploring patient needs.

Authors:  Jan Ho; Annette McWilliams; Jon Emery; Christobel Saunders; Christopher Reid; Suzanne Robinson; Fraser Brims
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2017-06-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.