Literature DB >> 25560272

A comparative study on complete and implant retained denture treatments: a biomechanics perspective.

Junning Chen1, Rohana Ahmad2, Hanako Suenaga3, Wei Li1, Michael Swain4, Qing Li5.   

Abstract

Although implant-retained overdenture allows edentulous patients to take higher occlusal forces than the conventional complete dentures, the biomechanical influences have not been explored yet. Clinically, there is limited knowledge and means for predicting localized bone remodelling after denture treatment with and without implant support. By using finite element (FE) analysis, this article provides an in-silico approach to exploring the treatment effects on the oral mucosa and potential resorption of residual ridge under three different denture configurations in a patient-specific manner. Based on cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans, a 3D heterogeneous FE model was created; and the supportive tissue, mucosa, was characterized as a hyperelastic material. A measured occlusal load (63N) was applied onto three virtual models, namely complete denture, two and four implant-retained overdentures. Clinically, the bone resorption was measured after one year in the two implant-retained overdenture treatment. Despite the improved stability and enhanced masticatory function, the implant-retained overdentures demonstrated higher hydrostatic stress in mucosa (43.6kPa and 39.9kPa for two and four implants) at the posterior ends of the mandible due to the cantilever effect, than the complete denture (33.4kPa). Hydrostatic pressure in the mucosa signifies a critical indicator and can be correlated with clinically measured bone resorption, pointing to severer mandibular ridge resorption posteriorly with implant-retained overdentures. This study provides a biomechanical basis for denture treatment planning to improve long-term outcomes with minimal residual ridge resorption.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heterogeneity; Hydrostatic pressure; Hyperelastic model; Mucosa and periosteum biomechanics; Residual ridge resorption

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25560272     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  In vivo effects of different orthodontic loading on root resorption and correlation with mechanobiological stimulus in periodontal ligament.

Authors:  Jingxiao Zhong; Junning Chen; Richard Weinkamer; M Ali Darendeliler; Michael V Swain; Andrian Sue; Keke Zheng; Qing Li
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Effect of attachment type on load distribution to implant abutments and the residual ridge in mandibular implant-supported overdentures.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Yoda; Yoshiki Matsudate; Masaru Abue; Guang Hong; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2015-03-16

Review 3.  To what extent residual alveolar ridge can be preserved by implant? A systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmed Khalifa Khalifa; Masahiro Wada; Kazunori Ikebe; Yoshinobu Maeda
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-11-23

4.  Linear Momenta Transferred to the Dental Implant-Bone and Natural Tooth-PDL-Bone Constructs Under Impact Loading: A Comparative in-vitro and in-silico Study.

Authors:  Ayda Karimi Dastgerdi; Gholamreza Rouhi; Mohammad Mehdi Dehghan; Saeed Farzad-Mohajeri; Hamid Reza Barikani
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-12

Review 5.  Biomechanics of oral mucosa.

Authors:  Junning Chen; Rohana Ahmad; Wei Li; Michael Swain; Qing Li
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  A 3-year prospective randomized clinical trial of alveolar bone crest response and clinical parameters through 1, 2, and 3 years of clinical function of implants placed 4 months after alveolar ridge preservation using two different allogeneic bone-grafting materials.

Authors:  Önder Solakoğlu; Duygu Ofluoğlu; Heidi Schwarzenbach; Guido Heydecke; Daniel Reißmann; Sertan Ergun; Werner Götz
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-02-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.