Literature DB >> 25560143

Committee opinion no. 618: Ovarian reserve testing.

.   

Abstract

The main goal of ovarian reserve testing is to identify those individuals who are at risk of decreased or diminished ovarian reserve, commonly known as DOR. Although ovarian reserve testing cannot predict the end of one's reproductive years, results outside the range expected for a patient's age can encourage the individual to pursue more aggressive treatment options to achieve pregnancy. Ovarian reserve testing should be performed for women older than 35 years who have not conceived after 6 months of attempting pregnancy and women at higher risk of diminished ovarian reserve. When test results suggest decreased or diminished ovarian reserve, if appropriate, an infertility evaluation should be initiated. It is reasonable to counsel the woman that her window of opportunity to conceive may be shorter than anticipated, and attempting to conceive sooner rather than later is encouraged. Compared with women of similar age, women with diminished ovarian reserve commonly have regular menses but a reduced quantity of ovarian follicles and, thus, may have a limited response to ovarian stimulation with fertility medications and reduced fecundity (probability of achieving a live birth in a single reproductive cycle). At this time, ovarian reserve testing results cannot be extrapolated to predict the likelihood of spontaneous conception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25560143     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000459864.68372.ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  38 in total

1.  Is ABO blood type associated with ovarian stimulation response in patients with diminished ovarian reserve?

Authors:  Nigel Pereira; Anne P Hutchinson; Jennifer L Bender; Jovana P Lekovich; Rony T Elias; Zev Rosenwaks; Steven D Spandorfer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Is anti-Müllerian hormone associated with IVF outcomes in young patients with diminished ovarian reserve?

Authors:  Nigel Pereira; Robert Setton; Allison C Petrini; Jovana P Lekovich; Rony T Elias; Steven D Spandorfer
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

3.  Alcohol, cigarette smoking, and ovarian reserve in reproductive-age African-American women.

Authors:  Leah Hawkins Bressler; Lia A Bernardi; Peter John D De Chavez; Donna D Baird; Mercedes R Carnethon; Erica E Marsh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Correlation of normal-range FMR1 repeat length or genotypes and reproductive parameters.

Authors:  Bat-Sheva L Maslow; Stephanie Davis; Lawrence Engmann; John C Nulsen; Claudio A Benadiva
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Age and Fertility: A Study on Patient Awareness.

Authors:  Sara Deatsman; Terrie Vasilopoulos; Alice Rhoton-Vlasak
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2016-08-01

6.  A novel mathematical model of true ovarian reserve assessment based on predicted probability of poor ovarian response: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Huiyu Xu; Guoshuang Feng; Haiyan Wang; Yong Han; Rui Yang; Ying Song; Lixue Chen; Li Shi; Meng Qian Zhang; Rong Li; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The dilemma of counseling patients about poor prognosis: live birth after IVF with autologous oocytes in a 43-year-old woman with FSH levels above 30 mIU/mL.

Authors:  Heather R Burks; Marsha Baker; Alexander M Quaas; Kristin A Bendikson; Karine Chung; Richard J Paulson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Biochemical changes and clinical outcomes in 34 patients with classic galactosemia.

Authors:  Tatiana Yuzyuk; Krista Viau; Ashley Andrews; Marzia Pasquali; Nicola Longo
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 9.  Late endocrine effects of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Susan R Rose; Vincent E Horne; Jonathan Howell; Sarah A Lawson; Meilan M Rutter; Gylynthia E Trotman; Sarah D Corathers
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 43.330

10.  Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist-to-hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?

Authors:  Tunay Kiremitli; Sevil Kiremitli; Pasa Ulug; Kemal Dinc; Kemine Uzel; Yusuf Kemal Arslan
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.