Jennifer A Hutcheon1, Lisa M Bodnar, Hyagriv N Simhan. 1. University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; the Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, and the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether state restrictions on Medicaid funding for pregnancy termination of anomalous fetuses could be contributing to the black-white disparity in infant death resulting from congenital anomalies. METHODS: Data on deaths resulting from anomalies were obtained from U.S. vital statistics records (1983-2004) and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2007). We conducted an ecological study using Poisson and logistic regression to explore the association between state Medicaid funding for pregnancy terminations of anomalous fetuses and infant death resulting from anomalies by calendar time, race, and individual Medicaid status. RESULTS: Since 1983, a gap in anomaly-related infant death has developed between states without compared with those with Medicaid funding for pregnancy termination (rate ratio in 2004 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.24; crude risks: 146.8 compared with 121.7/100,000). Blacks were significantly more likely than whites to be on Medicaid (60.2% compared with 29.2%) and to live in a state without Medicaid funding for pregnancy termination (65.8% compared with 59.6%). The increased risk of anomaly-related death associated with lack of state Medicaid funding for pregnancy termination was most pronounced among black women on Medicaid (relative risk 1.94, 95% CI 1.52-2.36; crude risks: 245.5 compared with 129.3/100,000). CONCLUSION: States without Medicaid funding for pregnancy termination of anomalous fetuses have higher rates of infant death resulting from anomalies than those with funding, and this difference is most pronounced among black women on Medicaid. Restrictions on Medicaid funding for termination of anomalous fetuses potentially could be contributing to the black-white disparity in anomaly-related infant death. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether state restrictions on Medicaid funding for pregnancy termination of anomalous fetuses could be contributing to the black-white disparity in infantdeath resulting from congenital anomalies. METHODS: Data on deaths resulting from anomalies were obtained from U.S. vital statistics records (1983-2004) and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2007). We conducted an ecological study using Poisson and logistic regression to explore the association between state Medicaid funding for pregnancy terminations of anomalous fetuses and infantdeath resulting from anomalies by calendar time, race, and individual Medicaid status. RESULTS: Since 1983, a gap in anomaly-related infantdeath has developed between states without compared with those with Medicaid funding for pregnancy termination (rate ratio in 2004 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.24; crude risks: 146.8 compared with 121.7/100,000). Blacks were significantly more likely than whites to be on Medicaid (60.2% compared with 29.2%) and to live in a state without Medicaid funding for pregnancy termination (65.8% compared with 59.6%). The increased risk of anomaly-related death associated with lack of state Medicaid funding for pregnancy termination was most pronounced among black women on Medicaid (relative risk 1.94, 95% CI 1.52-2.36; crude risks: 245.5 compared with 129.3/100,000). CONCLUSION: States without Medicaid funding for pregnancy termination of anomalous fetuses have higher rates of infantdeath resulting from anomalies than those with funding, and this difference is most pronounced among black women on Medicaid. Restrictions on Medicaid funding for termination of anomalous fetuses potentially could be contributing to the black-white disparity in anomaly-related infantdeath. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: Dominique Heinke; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Paige L Williams; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Marlene Anderka; Sarah C Fisher; Tania A Desrosiers; Gary M Shaw; Paul A Romitti; Mark A Canfield; Mahsa M Yazdy Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 3.103
Authors: Breidge Boyle; Marie-Claude Addor; Larraitz Arriola; Ingeborg Barisic; Fabrizio Bianchi; Melinda Csáky-Szunyogh; Hermien E K de Walle; Carlos Matias Dias; Elizabeth Draper; Miriam Gatt; Ester Garne; Martin Haeusler; Karin Källén; Anna Latos-Bielenska; Bob McDonnell; Carmel Mullaney; Vera Nelen; Amanda J Neville; Mary O'Mahony; Annette Queisser-Wahrendorf; Hanitra Randrianaivo; Judith Rankin; Anke Rissmann; Annukka Ritvanen; Catherine Rounding; David Tucker; Christine Verellen-Dumoulin; Diana Wellesley; Ben Wreyford; Natalia Zymak-Zakutnia; Helen Dolk Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 5.747