Literature DB >> 25559654

Affective processing requires awareness.

Mikko Lähteenmäki1, Jukka Hyönä2, Mika Koivisto2, Lauri Nummenmaa1.   

Abstract

Studies using backward masked emotional stimuli suggest that affective processing may occur outside visual awareness and imply primacy of affective over semantic processing, yet these experiments have not strictly controlled for the participants' awareness of the stimuli. Here we directly compared the primacy of affective versus semantic categorization of biologically relevant stimuli in 5 experiments (n = 178) using explicit (semantic and affective discrimination; Experiments 1-3) and implicit (semantic and affective priming; Experiments 4-5) measures. The same stimuli were used in semantic and affective tasks. Visual awareness was manipulated by varying exposure duration of the masked stimuli, and subjective level of stimulus awareness was measured after each trial using a 4-point perceptual awareness scale. When participants reported no awareness of the stimuli, semantic and affective categorization were at chance level and priming scores did not differ from zero. When participants were even partially aware of the stimuli, (a) both semantic and affective categorization could be performed above chance level with equal accuracy, (b) semantic categorization was faster than affective categorization, and (c) both semantic and affective priming were observed. Affective categorization speed was linearly dependent on semantic categorization speed, suggesting dependence of affective processing on semantic recognition. Manipulations of affective and semantic categorization tasks revealed a hierarchy of categorization operations beginning with basic-level semantic categorization and ending with superordinate level affective categorization. We conclude that both implicit and explicit affective and semantic categorization is dependent on visual awareness, and that affective recognition follows semantic categorization. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25559654     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  8 in total

1.  Phenomenal consciousness and cognitive access.

Authors:  Morten Overgaard
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Comparison of affective and semantic priming in different SOA.

Authors:  Zhongqing Jiang; Yuhong Qu; Yanli Xiao; Qi Wu; Likun Xia; Wenhui Li; Ying Liu
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-06-25

3.  In the face of pain: The choice of visual cues in pain conditioning matters.

Authors:  N Egorova; J Park; J Kong
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  On the Automatic Nature of Threat: Physiological and Evaluative Reactions to Survival-Threats Outside Conscious Perception.

Authors:  David S March; Lowell Gaertner; Michael A Olson
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2022-01-07

5.  Contextual knowledge provided by a movie biases implicit perception of the protagonist.

Authors:  Mamdooh Afdile; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Enrico Glerean; Dmitry Smirnov; Jussi Alho; Anna Äimälä; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Are Humans Prepared to Detect, Fear, and Avoid Snakes? The Mismatch Between Laboratory and Ecological Evidence.

Authors:  Carlos M Coelho; Panrapee Suttiwan; Abul M Faiz; Fernando Ferreira-Santos; Andras N Zsido
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-11

7.  Subliminal influence on preferences? A test of evaluative conditioning for brief visual conditioned stimuli using auditory unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Tobias Heycke; Frederik Aust; Christoph Stahl
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  How Monitor Characteristics Affect Human Perception in Visual Computer Experiments: CRT vs. LCD Monitors in Millisecond Precise Timing Research.

Authors:  Michaela Rohr; Alexander Wagner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.