PURPOSE: The purposes of this study are to examine the course and prevalence of anxiety and depression over 24 months in women with newly diagnosed breast and gynaecologic cancer and, controlling for demographic and clinical confounders, to test the role of neuroticism and psychiatric history in determining outcome 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-diagnosis. METHODS: Participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety subscale and Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale on an 8-weekly basis from diagnosis until 96 weeks. Changes over time were analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA. Hierarchical linear regression, adjusted a priori for age, chemotherapy and radiation treatment, living alone, education and tumour stream were used to predict anxiety and depression. RESULTS: Participants were 105 women (66 breast, 39 gynaecologic). Rates of anxiety (18.1 %) and depression (33.3 %) were highest at diagnosis. Average rates of anxiety and depression were 5.9 and 22.4 %, respectively. Average scores of anxiety and depression were highest at diagnosis, with improvement at 8 and 40 weeks, respectively, subsequently maintained. Morbidity at diagnosis was particularly acute among women with a treatment history of anxiety/depression or with high neuroticism. These three variables were the best and only predictors over 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Women are most vulnerable to anxiety and depression at diagnosis, with improvement over time. Morbidity rates are lower than reported elsewhere. Women with high neuroticism and a psychiatric history are at greatest risk for future morbidity after adjusting for confounders. Early identification of these women plus heightened surveillance or early referral to psychosocial services may protect against longer-term morbidity.
PURPOSE: The purposes of this study are to examine the course and prevalence of anxiety and depression over 24 months in women with newly diagnosed breast and gynaecologic cancer and, controlling for demographic and clinical confounders, to test the role of neuroticism and psychiatric history in determining outcome 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-diagnosis. METHODS:Participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety subscale and Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale on an 8-weekly basis from diagnosis until 96 weeks. Changes over time were analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA. Hierarchical linear regression, adjusted a priori for age, chemotherapy and radiation treatment, living alone, education and tumour stream were used to predict anxiety and depression. RESULTS:Participants were 105 women (66 breast, 39 gynaecologic). Rates of anxiety (18.1 %) and depression (33.3 %) were highest at diagnosis. Average rates of anxiety and depression were 5.9 and 22.4 %, respectively. Average scores of anxiety and depression were highest at diagnosis, with improvement at 8 and 40 weeks, respectively, subsequently maintained. Morbidity at diagnosis was particularly acute among women with a treatment history of anxiety/depression or with high neuroticism. These three variables were the best and only predictors over 24 months. CONCLUSIONS:Women are most vulnerable to anxiety and depression at diagnosis, with improvement over time. Morbidity rates are lower than reported elsewhere. Women with high neuroticism and a psychiatric history are at greatest risk for future morbidity after adjusting for confounders. Early identification of these women plus heightened surveillance or early referral to psychosocial services may protect against longer-term morbidity.
Authors: J A Kramer; D Curran; M Piccart; J C de Haes; P F Bruning; J G Klijn; M Bontenbal; C van Pottelsberghe; M Groenvold; R Paridaens Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Pim Cuijpers; Filip Smit; Brenda W J H Penninx; Ron de Graaf; Margreet ten Have; Aartjan T F Beekman Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-10
Authors: Tim Luckett; Phyllis N Butow; Madeleine T King; Mayumi Oguchi; Gaynor Heading; Nadine A Hackl; Nicole Rankin; Melanie A Price Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-07-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Floortje K Ploos van Amstel; Sanne W van den Berg; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Marieke F M Gielissen; Judith B Prins; Petronella B Ottevanger Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kristin Härtl; Jutta Engel; Peter Herschbach; Hans Reinecker; Harald Sommer; Klaus Friese Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Juliane Farthmann; A Hanjalic-Beck; J Veit; B Rautenberg; E Stickeler; T Erbes; M Földi; A Hasenburg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Saira Sanjida; Kelly Mulvogue; Joanne Shaw; Jeremy Couper; David Kissane; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Melanie A Price; Monika Janda Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Abigail S Robbertz; David M Weiss; Farrukh T Awan; John C Byrd; Kerry A Rogers; Jennifer A Woyach Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sven Alfonsson; Erik Olsson; Timo Hursti; Marie Høyer Lundh; Birgitta Johansson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kaaren J Watts; Louise H Good; Sandy McKiernan; Lisa Miller; Moira O'Connor; Robert Kane; Deborah J Kruger; Bree R Adams; Toni Musiello Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-10-17 Impact factor: 3.359