Literature DB >> 25558095

Using the Bollen-Stine Bootstrapping Method for Evaluating Approximate Fit Indices.

Hanjoe Kim1, Roger Millsap1.   

Abstract

Accepting that a model will not exactly fit any empirical data, global approximate fit indices quantify the degree of misfit. Recent research (Chen et al., 2008) has shown that using fixed conventional cut-points for approximate fit indices can lead to decision errors. Instead of using fixed cut-points for evaluating approximate fit indices, this study focuses on the meaning of approximate fit and introduces a new method to evaluate approximate fit indices. Millsap (2012) introduced a simulation-based method to evaluate approximate fit indices. A limitation of Millsap's work was that a rather strong assumption of multivariate normality was implied in generating simulation data. In this study, the Bollen-Stine bootstrapping procedure (Bollen & Stine, 1993) is proposed to supplement the former study. When data are non-normal, the conclusions derived from Millsap's (2012) simulation method and the Bollen-Stine method can differ. Examples are given to illustrate the use of the Bollen-Stine bootstrapping procedure for evaluating RMSEA. Comparisons are made with the simulation method. The results are discussed, and suggestions are given for the use of proposed method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bollen-Stine bootstrapping; RMSEA; approximate fit indices; cut-points

Year:  2014        PMID: 25558095      PMCID: PMC4280787          DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2014.947352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  3 in total

1.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Use of Fixed Cutoff Points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Feinian Chen; Patrick J Curran; Kenneth A Bollen; James Kirby; Pamela Paxton
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2008-01-01

2.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The family check-up with high-risk indigent families: preventing problem behavior by increasing parents' positive behavior support in early childhood.

Authors:  Thomas J Dishion; Daniel Shaw; Arin Connell; Frances Gardner; Chelsea Weaver; Melvin Wilson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct
  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Dynamic fit index cutoffs for one-factor models.

Authors:  Daniel McNeish; Melissa G Wolf
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Modelling health belief predictors of oral health and dental anxiety among adolescents based on the Health Belief Model: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bilu Xiang; Hai Ming Wong; Antonio P Perfecto; Colman P J McGrath
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Andersen's utilization model for cataract surgical rate and empirical evidence from economically-developing areas.

Authors:  Senlin Lin; Yingyan Ma; Zhiyuan Hou; Nathan Congdon; Lina Lu; Haidong Zou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Exploration of Leisure Constraints Perception in the Context of a Pandemic: An Empirical Study of the Macau Light Festival.

Authors:  Xi Li; Jiamin Liu; Xinwei Su; Yinan Xiao; Changbin Xu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  Childhood abuse and borderline personality disorder features in Chinese undergraduates: the role of self-esteem and resilience.

Authors:  Guo-Die Xie; Jun-Jie Chang; Meng-Yuan Yuan; Geng-Fu Wang; Yang He; Shan-Shan Chen; Pu-Yu Su
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.630

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.