Literature DB >> 25557879

Three-dimensional effect of pitch, roll, and yaw rotations on maxillomandibular complex movement.

Sung-Jin Kim1, Kee-Joon Lee1, Hyung-Seog Yu1, Young-Soo Jung2, Hyoung-Seon Baik3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional (3D) effect of pitch, roll, and yaw rotations on maxillomandibular complex (MMC) movements in skeletal Class III surgical patients using 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data and mathematical calculations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative CBCT data of 152 skeletal Class III surgical patients was obtained. The subjects were divided into four groups: group 1, non-extraction with a normal/short face; group 2, non-extraction with a long face; group 3, extraction with a normal/short face; and group 4, extraction with a long face. The maxillary and mandibular landmarks were digitized on the reconstructed 3D models, and the movements of their standardized coordinates by pitch, roll, and yaw rotations were calculated using a transformation matrix.
RESULTS: The rotations resulted in significantly different amounts of MMC movement among the groups, which generally increased from groups 1 to 4. While roll rotation greatly affected the lateral movement of the menton and the vertical movement of the gonion, yaw rotation primarily affected the lateral and anteroposterior movement of the gonion. Combined pitch and roll rotations were required for unilateral impaction of the maxillary first molar.
CONCLUSION: The 3D surgical treatment objectives (STO) method was valuable for accurate prediction of MMC movements by pitch, roll, and yaw rotations, which are frequently required in orthognathic surgery patients.
Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D STO; CBCT; Facial asymmetry; Mathematical calculation; Orthognathic surgery; Transformation matrix

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25557879     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

Review 1.  Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Manikandhan Ramanathan; Godwin Alex Kiruba; Amelia Christabel; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran; Sanjanaa Kapoor; Hermann F Sailer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-21

2.  In Vivo Accuracy of a New Digital Planning System in Terms of Jaw Relation, Extent of Surgical Movements and the Hierarchy of Stability in Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Stamm; Eugenia Andriyuk; Johannes Kleinheinz; Susanne Jung; Dieter Dirksen; Claudius Middelberg
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-21

Review 3.  Contemporary Correction of Dentofacial Anomalies: A Clinical Assessment.

Authors:  Nicolai Adolphs; Nicole Ernst; Erwin Keeve; Bodo Hoffmeister
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-28

4.  Integrating maxillary dentition and 3D facial photo using a modified CAD/CAM facebow.

Authors:  Peiqi Wang; Hui Xu; Rui Gu; Liwei Zhu; Ding Bai; Chaoran Xue
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in Class III subjects. Part 1: a retrospective study evaluating postsurgical outcomes.

Authors:  Deepal Haresh Ajmera; Richard Tai-Chiu Hsung; Pradeep Singh; Natalie Sui Miu Wong; Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Walter Yu Hang Lam; Balvinder S Khambay; Yiu Yan Leung; Min Gu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 6.  A novel method for the management of proximal segment using computer assisted simulation surgery: correct condyle head positioning and better proximal segment placement.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Lee; Hong-Bum Sohn; Sung-Keun Kim; On-Yu Bae; Jang-Ha Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-08-04

7.  The outcome of skeletofacial reconstruction with mandibular rotation for management of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity: A three-dimensional computer-assisted investigation.

Authors:  Ting-Yu Wu; Rafael Denadai; Hsiu-Hsia Lin; Cheng-Ting Ho; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparison of three midsagittal planes for three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography head reorientation.

Authors:  Eon-Hwa Lee; Hyung-Seog Yu; Kee-Joon Lee; Sang-Sun Han; Hwi-Dong Jung; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.372

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.