| Literature DB >> 25557819 |
T Haryati, T Susanti, I W R Susana.
Abstract
An experiment was conducted to increase the quality of rice bran by fermentation using Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and humic substances and its utilization as a feed ingredient for broiler chickens. The experiment was carried out in two steps. First, the fermentation process was done using a completely randomized design in factorial with 16 treatments: i) Dosage of B. amyloliquefaciens (2.10(8) cfu/g), 10 and 20 g/kg; ii) Graded levels of humic substances, 0, 100, 200, and 400 ppm; iii) Length of fermentation, three and five days. The results showed that the fermentation significantly (p<0.05) reduced crude fiber content. The recommended conditions for fermentation of rice bran: 20 g/kg dosage of inoculums B. amyloliquefaciens, 100 ppm level of humic substances and three days fermentation period. The second step was a feeding trial to evaluate the fermented rice bran (FRB) as a feed ingredient for broiler chickens. Three hundred and seventy-five one-day-old broiler chicks were randomly assigned into five treatment diets. Arrangement of the diets as follows: 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% level of FRB and the diets formulation based on equal amounts of energy and protein. The results showed that 15% inclusion of FRB in the diet provided the best bodyweight gain and feed conversion ratio (FCR) values. In conclusion, the nutrient content of rice bran improved after fermentation and the utilization of FRB as a feed ingredient for broiler chickens could be included up to 15% of the broiler diet.Entities:
Keywords: Broiler Chickens; Crude Fiber; Fermentation; Performance; Rice Bran
Year: 2015 PMID: 25557819 PMCID: PMC4283168 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.14.0039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Ingredients and chemical composition of diets provided during experiments
| Items | Level of fermented rice bran in broiler diet (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | |
| Ingredient (%) | |||||
| Fermented rice bran | 0.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 15.00 | 20.00 |
| Soybean meal | 32.70 | 32.00 | 31.20 | 30.20 | 29.40 |
| Fish meal | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Corn | 56.30 | 52.00 | 47.80 | 43.80 | 39.60 |
| Limestone | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 |
| Dicalciumphosphate | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Salt | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Vitamin and mineral mix | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Analyzed nutrient content | |||||
| Crude protein (%) | 22.33 | 21.52 | 21.88 | 21.69 | 22.26 |
| Metabolizable energy | 3,126 | 3,143 | 3,137 | 3,096 | 3,076 |
| Crude fat (%) | 5.16 | 5.31 | 5.46 | 5.51 | 5.83 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 2.97 | 3.37 | 3.79 | 3.96 | 4.24 |
| Calcium (%) | 1.27 | 1.22 | 1.26 | 1.27 | 1.27 |
| Phosphorus (%) | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
Metabolizable energy (ME) was calculated according to NRC (1994).
Effects of fermentation on crude fiber content (%)
| Level of humic substances (ppm) | Level of microbes (2.108 cfu/g) | Mean | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 10 g/kg | 20 g/kg | ||||
|
|
| ||||
| Length of fermentation | Length of fermentation | ||||
| Day 3 | Day 5 | Day 3 | Day 5 | ||
| 0 | 9.05 | 8.93 | 8.56 | 8.68 | 8.81 |
| 100 | 8.72 | 8.71 | 7.83 | 7.83 | 8.27 |
| 200 | 8.66 | 8.67 | 7.58 | 7.61 | 8.13 |
| 400 | 8.71 | 8.72 | 7.84 | 7.76 | 8.26 |
| Mean | 8.79 | 8.75 | 7.95 | 7.97 | |
| SEM | ------------------------------------------------- 0.039 ----------------------------------------------- | ||||
Initial crude fiber content = 10.62%.
SEM, standard error mean.
Values with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).
Values with different superscripts in the same column differ significantly (p<0.05).
Significance effects: microbes = S, humic substances = S, length of fermentation = NS, microbes×humic substances = S, microbes× length of fermentation = S, microbes×humic substances×length of fermentation = NS (S = significant, NS = non significant at p<0.05).
Chemical composition and total microbes of rice bran before and after fermentation
| Nutrient | Before fermentation | After fermentation |
|---|---|---|
| Crude protein (%) | 12.10 | 13.40 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 10.62 | 7.79 |
| Gross energy (kcal/kg) | 3165 | 3315 |
| Calcium (%) | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Phosphorus (%) | 0.89 | 0.91 |
| Total microbes (cfu/g) | Not analysed | 2.107 |
Colony forming unit/gram.
Growth performances of broiler chicks fed different levels of fermented rice bran (FRB)
| Parameter | Level of FRB (%) | SEM | FRB effects (p-value) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Feed consumption (g) | ||||||||
| 1 to 21 days | 913 | 964 | 934 | 911 | 1,024 | 59.2 | NS | |
| 22 to 35 days | 1,773 | 1,793 | 2,016 | 1,434 | 1,998 | 156.5 | NS | |
| 1 to 35 days | 2,687 | 2,757 | 2,950 | 2,345 | 3,022 | 141.7 | NS | |
| Bodyweight gain (g) | ||||||||
| 1 to 21 days | 474 | 504 | 471 | 453 | 439 | 18.3 | NS | |
| 22 to 35 days | 807 | 808 | 773 | 846 | 779 | 49.5 | NS | NS |
| 1 to 35 days | 1,271 | 1,286 | 1,187 | 1,206 | 1,153 | 51.7 | NS | |
| Feed conversion ratio | ||||||||
| 1 to 21 days | 1.93 | 1.91 | 1.99 | 2.01 | 2.33 | 0.119 | ||
| 22 to 35 days | 2.20 | 2.24 | 2.61 | 1.70 | 2.56 | 0.174 | NS | |
| 1 to 35 days | 2.12 | 2.28 | 2.49 | 1.95 | 2.62 | 0.253 | NS | |
SEM, standard error mean, NS, non significant.
Values followed by different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).
p<0.01,
p<0.0001.