G K Wong1, R J Shulman, B P Chumpitazi. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A standardized 4-h adult-based gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) protocol is increasingly being used in children to evaluate for gastroparesis. We sought to determine the effect of age, anthropometrics, and study duration on GES results using this protocol in children. METHODS: Retrospective review of children who underwent a 4-h solid-meal GES study at a tertiary care center. GES results and anthropometric data (e.g., weight, stature, body surface area [BSA]) were systematically captured. KEY RESULTS: Of 216 children, 188 (87%) were able to complete the study meal. Children unable to complete the meal were younger and smaller. In multivariate analysis, only increasing BSA was identified as being positively associated with ability to complete the meal (odds ratio: 19.7; p < 0.001). Of those completing the meal, 48 (26%) had delayed emptying (4-h retention value >10%). These children were significantly younger and smaller than those with normal emptying. In multivariate analysis of those completing the meal, only increasing BSA (odds ratio: 0.26; p = 0.006) was identified as being negatively associated with delayed emptying. There was a progressive increase in the positive predictive value for identification of delayed gastric emptying as the duration of the study increased (0.25, 0.60, and 0.71 at 1, 2, and 3 h, respectively) using the 4-hr value as a comparator. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Young children have more difficulty completing the GES meal. Childhood gastric retention is affected by age and anthropometric factors, primarily BSA. The standardized 4-h GES protocol may need to take these factors into account in children.
BACKGROUND: A standardized 4-h adult-based gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) protocol is increasingly being used in children to evaluate for gastroparesis. We sought to determine the effect of age, anthropometrics, and study duration on GES results using this protocol in children. METHODS: Retrospective review of children who underwent a 4-h solid-meal GES study at a tertiary care center. GES results and anthropometric data (e.g., weight, stature, body surface area [BSA]) were systematically captured. KEY RESULTS: Of 216 children, 188 (87%) were able to complete the study meal. Children unable to complete the meal were younger and smaller. In multivariate analysis, only increasing BSA was identified as being positively associated with ability to complete the meal (odds ratio: 19.7; p < 0.001). Of those completing the meal, 48 (26%) had delayed emptying (4-h retention value >10%). These children were significantly younger and smaller than those with normal emptying. In multivariate analysis of those completing the meal, only increasing BSA (odds ratio: 0.26; p = 0.006) was identified as being negatively associated with delayed emptying. There was a progressive increase in the positive predictive value for identification of delayed gastric emptying as the duration of the study increased (0.25, 0.60, and 0.71 at 1, 2, and 3 h, respectively) using the 4-hr value as a comparator. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Young children have more difficulty completing the GES meal. Childhood gastric retention is affected by age and anthropometric factors, primarily BSA. The standardized 4-h GES protocol may need to take these factors into account in children.
Authors: T L Abell; R K Bernstein; T Cutts; G Farrugia; J Forster; W L Hasler; R W McCallum; K W Olden; H P Parkman; C R Parrish; P J Pasricha; C M Prather; E E Soffer; R Twillman; A I Vinik Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: G Tougas; E Y Eaker; T L Abell; H Abrahamsson; M Boivin; J Chen; M P Hocking; E M Quigley; K L Koch; A Z Tokayer; V Stanghellini; Y Chen; J D Huizinga; J Rydén; I Bourgeois; R W McCallum Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Henry P Parkman; Katherine Yates; William L Hasler; Linda Nguyen; Pankaj J Pasricha; William J Snape; Gianrico Farrugia; Kenneth L Koch; Thomas L Abell; Richard W McCallum; Linda Lee; Aynur Unalp-Arida; James Tonascia; Frank Hamilton Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: D Ziegler; P Schadewaldt; A Pour Mirza; R Piolot; B Schommartz; M Reinhardt; H Vosberg; H Brösicke; F A Gries Journal: Diabetologia Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Liz Febo-Rodriguez; Bruno P Chumpitazi; Salma Musaad; Andrew C Sher; Robert J Shulman Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: James W Varni; Robert J Shulman; Mariella M Self; Liz Febo-Rodriguez; Heather Charron; Kent Williams; Sam Nurko; Rachel L Rosen; Bruno P Chumpitazi Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 3.288
Authors: Ahmed El-Serafi; Rui He; Wenyi Zheng; Fadwa Benkossou; Sandra Oerther; Ying Zhao; Karin Mellgren; Britt Gustafsson; Carsten Heilmann; Jukka Kanerva; Kourosh Lotfi; Jacek Toporski; Mikael Sundin; Martin Höglund; Jonas Mattsson; Ibrahim El-Serafi; Moustapha Hassan Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.483