Literature DB >> 25557179

The effect of spatial frequency on peripheral collinear facilitation.

Marcello Maniglia1, Andrea Pavan2, Yves Trotter3.   

Abstract

The detection of a Gabor patch (target) can be decreased or improved by the presence of co-oriented Gabor patches (flankers) having the same spatial frequency as the target. These phenomena are thought to be mediated by lateral interactions. Depending on the distance between target and flankers, commonly defined as a multiple of the wavelength (λ) of the carrier, flankers can increase or decrease a target's detectability. Studies with foveal presentation showed that for target-to-flankers distances<2λ contrast thresholds for the central target increase, while for target-to-flankers distances>3λ contrast thresholds decrease. Earlier studies on collinear facilitation at the near-periphery of the visual field (4° of eccentricity) showed inconsistent facilitation (Shani & Sagi, 2005, Vision Research, 45, 2009-2024) whereas more recent studies showed consistent facilitation for larger separations (7-8λ) (Maniglia et al., 2011, PLoS ONE, 6, e25568; Lev & Polat, 2011, Vision Research, 51, 2488-2498). However, all of these studies used medium-to-high spatial frequencies (3-8 cpd). In this study we tested lower spatial frequencies (1, 2, and 3 cpd) with different target-to-flankers distances. The rationale was that near-peripheral vision is tuned for lower spatial frequencies and this could be reflected in collinear facilitation. Results show consistent collinear facilitation at 8λ for all the spatial frequencies tested, but also show collinear facilitation at shorter target-to-flanker distance (6λ) for the lowest spatial frequencies tested (1 cpd). Additionally, collinear facilitation decreases as spatial frequency increases; opposite to the findings of Polat (2009, Spatial Vision, 22, 179-193) in the fovea, indicating a different spatial frequency tuning between foveal and peripheral lateral interactions.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collinear facilitation; Lateral interactions; Near-periphery of the visual field; Spatial frequency tuning

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25557179     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation Approaches in Macular Degeneration Patients.

Authors:  Marcello Maniglia; Benoit R Cottereau; Vincent Soler; Yves Trotter
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-27

2.  Spontaneous and training-induced cortical plasticity in MD patients: Hints from lateral masking.

Authors:  Marcello Maniglia; Vincent Soler; Benoit Cottereau; Yves Trotter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Contextual influences in the peripheral retina of patients with macular degeneration.

Authors:  Giulio Contemori; Luca Battaglini; Clara Casco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Excitatory and inhibitory lateral interactions effects on contrast detection are modulated by tRNS.

Authors:  L Battaglini; G Contemori; A Fertonani; C Miniussi; A Coccaro; C Casco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Combining fixation and lateral masking training enhances perceptual learning effects in patients with macular degeneration.

Authors:  Marcello Maniglia; Vincent Soler; Yves Trotter
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The spatial range of peripheral collinear facilitation.

Authors:  Marcello Maniglia; Andrea Pavan; Felipe Aedo-Jury; Yves Trotter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  TMS reveals inhibitory extrastriate cortico-cortical feedback modulation of V1 activity in humans.

Authors:  M Maniglia; Y Trotter; F Aedo-Jury
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.270

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.