Peter G K Wagstaff1, Daniel M de Bruin2, Willemien van den Bos3, Alexandre Ingels3, Martin J C van Gemert4, Patricia J Zondervan3, Rudolf M Verdaasdonk5, Krijn P van Lienden6, Ton G van Leeuwen4, Jean J M C H de la Rosette3, M Pilar Laguna Pes3. 1. Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: p.g.wagstaff@amc.nl. 2. Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Physics & Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although tissue ablation by irreversible electroporation (IRE) has been characterized as nonthermal, the application of frequent repetitive high-intensity electric pulses has the potential of substantially heating the targeted tissue and causing thermal damage. This study evaluates the risk of possible thermal damage by measuring temperature development and distribution during IRE of porcine kidney tissue. METHODS: The animal procedures were conducted following an approved Institutional Animal Ethics Committee protocol. IRE ablation was performed in 8 porcine kidneys. Of them, 4 kidneys were treated with a 3-needle configuration and the remaining 4 with a 4-needle configuration. All IRE ablations consisted of 70 pulses with a length 90 µs. The pulse frequency was set at 90 pulses/min, and the pulse intensity at 1,500 V/cm with a spacing of 15 mm between the needles. The temperature was measured internally using 4 fiber-optic temperature probes and at the surface using a thermal camera. RESULTS: For the 3-needle configuration, a peak temperature of 57°C (mean = 49 ± 10°C, n = 3) was measured in the core of the ablation zone and 40°C (mean = 36 ± 3°C, n = 3) at 1cm outside of the ablation zone, from a baseline temperature of 33 ± 1°C. For the 4-needle configuration, a peak temperature of 79°C (mean = 62 ± 16°C, n = 3) was measured in the core of the ablation zone and 42°C (mean = 39 ± 3°C, n = 3) at 1cm outside of the ablation zone, from a baseline of 35 ± 1°C. The thermal camera recorded the peak surface temperatures in the center of the ablation zone, reaching 31°C and 35°C for the 3- and 4-needle configuration IRE (baseline 22°C). CONCLUSIONS: The application of repetitive high-intensity electric pulses during IRE ablation in porcine kidney causes a lethal rise in temperature within the ablation zone. Temperature monitoring should be considered when performing IRE ablation near vital structures.
OBJECTIVE: Although tissue ablation by irreversible electroporation (IRE) has been characterized as nonthermal, the application of frequent repetitive high-intensity electric pulses has the potential of substantially heating the targeted tissue and causing thermal damage. This study evaluates the risk of possible thermal damage by measuring temperature development and distribution during IRE of porcine kidney tissue. METHODS: The animal procedures were conducted following an approved Institutional Animal Ethics Committee protocol. IRE ablation was performed in 8 porcine kidneys. Of them, 4 kidneys were treated with a 3-needle configuration and the remaining 4 with a 4-needle configuration. All IRE ablations consisted of 70 pulses with a length 90 µs. The pulse frequency was set at 90 pulses/min, and the pulse intensity at 1,500 V/cm with a spacing of 15 mm between the needles. The temperature was measured internally using 4 fiber-optic temperature probes and at the surface using a thermal camera. RESULTS: For the 3-needle configuration, a peak temperature of 57°C (mean = 49 ± 10°C, n = 3) was measured in the core of the ablation zone and 40°C (mean = 36 ± 3°C, n = 3) at 1cm outside of the ablation zone, from a baseline temperature of 33 ± 1°C. For the 4-needle configuration, a peak temperature of 79°C (mean = 62 ± 16°C, n = 3) was measured in the core of the ablation zone and 42°C (mean = 39 ± 3°C, n = 3) at 1cm outside of the ablation zone, from a baseline of 35 ± 1°C. The thermal camera recorded the peak surface temperatures in the center of the ablation zone, reaching 31°C and 35°C for the 3- and 4-needle configuration IRE (baseline 22°C). CONCLUSIONS: The application of repetitive high-intensity electric pulses during IRE ablation in porcine kidney causes a lethal rise in temperature within the ablation zone. Temperature monitoring should be considered when performing IRE ablation near vital structures.
Authors: Stefan Fritz; Christof M Sommer; Thomas Longerich; Clemens Kuhn-Neureuther; Boris Radeleff; Jens Werner; Thilo Hackert Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: H Petra Kok; Erik N K Cressman; Wim Ceelen; Christopher L Brace; Robert Ivkov; Holger Grüll; Gail Ter Haar; Peter Wust; Johannes Crezee Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2020 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Mara Buijs; Daniel M de Bruin; Peter Gk Wagstaff; Patricia J Zondervan; Matthijs JV Scheltema; Marc W Engelbrecht; Maria P Laguna; Krijn P van Lienden Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2021-09 Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Peter G K Wagstaff; Daniel M de Bruin; Patricia J Zondervan; C Dilara Savci Heijink; Marc R W Engelbrecht; Otto M van Delden; Ton G van Leeuwen; Hessel Wijkstra; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; M Pilar Laguna Pes Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-03-22 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Hester J Scheffer; Jantien A Vogel; Willemien van den Bos; Martijn R Meijerink; Marc Gh Besselink; Rudolf M Verdaasdonk; John Klaessens; Cees Wm van der Geld; Martin Jc van Gemert Journal: Acta Radiol Open Date: 2015-07-07
Authors: W van den Bos; D M de Bruin; R R Jurhill; C D Savci-Heijink; B G Muller; I M Varkarakis; A Skolarikos; P J Zondervan; M P Laguna-Pes; H Wijkstra; T M de Reijke; J J M C H de la Rosette Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-08-22 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Mara Buijs; Krijn P van Lienden; Peter Gk Wagstaff; Matthijs Jv Scheltema; Daniel M de Bruin; Patricia J Zondervan; Otto M van Delden; Ton G van Leeuwen; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; M Pilar Laguna Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-02-16
Authors: Hester J Scheffer; Jantien A Vogel; Willemien van den Bos; Robert E Neal; Krijn P van Lienden; Marc G H Besselink; Martin J C van Gemert; Cees W M van der Geld; Martijn R Meijerink; John H Klaessens; Rudolf M Verdaasdonk Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Peter Gk Wagstaff; Mara Buijs; Willemien van den Bos; Daniel M de Bruin; Patricia J Zondervan; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; M Pilar Laguna Pes Journal: Onco Targets Ther Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 4.147