Literature DB >> 25556972

Development and application of a multimetal multibiotic ligand model for assessing aquatic toxicity of metal mixtures.

Robert C Santore1, Adam C Ryan.   

Abstract

A multimetal, multiple binding site version of the biotic ligand model (mBLM) has been developed for predicting and explaining the bioavailability and toxicity of mixtures of metals to aquatic organisms. The mBLM was constructed by combining information from single-metal BLMs to preserve compatibility between the single-metal and multiple-metal approaches. The toxicities from individual metals were predicted by assuming additivity of the individual responses. Mixture toxicity was predicted based on both dissolved metal and mBLM-normalized bioavailable metal. Comparison of the 2 prediction methods indicates that metal mixtures frequently appear to have greater toxicity than an additive estimation of individual effects on a dissolved metal basis. However, on an mBLM-normalized basis, mixtures of metals appear to be additive or less than additive. This difference results from interactions between metals and ligands in solutions including natural organic matter, processes that are accounted for in the mBLM. As part of the mBLM approach, a technique for considering variability was developed to calculate confidence bounds (called response envelopes) around the central concentration-response relationship. Predictions using the mBLM and response envelope were compared with observed toxicity for a number of invertebrate and fish species. The results show that the mBLM is a useful tool for considering bioavailability when assessing the toxicity of metal mixtures.
© 2014 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biotic ligand model; Metals; Mixtures; Modeling; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25556972     DOI: 10.1002/etc.2869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  5 in total

1.  A test of the additivity of acute toxicity of binary-metal mixtures of ni with Cd, Cu, and Zn to Daphnia magna, using the inflection point of the concentration-response curves.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Traudt; James F Ranville; Samantha A Smith; Joseph S Meyer
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Incorporating bioavailability into toxicity assessment of Cu-Ni, Cu-Cd, and Ni-Cd mixtures with the extended biotic ligand model and the WHAM-F(tox) approach.

Authors:  Hao Qiu; Martina G Vijver; Erkai He; Yang Liu; Peng Wang; Bing Xia; Erik Smolders; Liske Versieren; Willie J G M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Toward Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for Asia.

Authors:  Kenneth M Y Leung; Katie W Y Yeung; Jing You; Kyungho Choi; Xiaowei Zhang; Ross Smith; Guang-Jie Zhou; Mana M N Yung; Carlos Arias-Barreiro; Youn-Joo An; S Rebekah Burket; Robert Dwyer; Nathalie Goodkin; Yii Siang Hii; Tham Hoang; Chris Humphrey; Chuleemas Boonthai Iwai; Seung-Woo Jeong; Guillaume Juhel; Ali Karami; Katerina Kyriazi-Huber; Kuan-Chun Lee; Bin-Le Lin; Ben Lu; Patrick Martin; Mae Grace Nillos; Katharina Oginawati; I V N Rathnayake; Yenny Risjani; Mohammad Shoeb; Chin Hon Tan; Maria Claret Tsuchiya; Gerald T Ankley; Alistair B A Boxall; Murray A Rudd; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Sensitivity of Ostracods to U, Cd and Cu: The Case of Cypridopsis vidua.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Zheng Huo; Chi Su; Yong Liu; Wei Huang; Shan Liu; Peng Feng; Zhixin Guo; Zhihua Su; Haiyang He; Qinglin Sui
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-06-24

Review 5.  Validation of Bioavailability-Based Toxicity Models for Metals.

Authors:  Emily R Garman; Joseph S Meyer; Christine M Bergeron; Tamzin A Blewett; William H Clements; Michael C Elias; Kevin J Farley; Francesca Gissi; Adam C Ryan
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.218

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.