Literature DB >> 25556459

Tumor markers for diagnosis, monitoring of recurrence and prognosis in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer.

Jie-Xian Jing1, Yan Wang, Xiao-Qin Xu, Ting Sun, Bao-Guo Tian, Li-Li Du, Xian-Wen Zhao, Cun-Zhi Han.   

Abstract

To evaluate the value of combined detection of serum CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2, AFP, CA72-4, SCC, TPA and TPS for the clinical diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) cancer and to analyze the efficacy of these tumor markers (TMs) in evaluating curative effects and prognosis. A total of 573 patients with upper GIT cancer between January 2004 and December 2007 were enrolled in this study. Serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2, AFP, CA72-4, SCC, TPA and TPS were examined preoperatively and every 3 months postoperatively by ELISA. The sensitivity of CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2, AFP, CA72-4, SCC, TPA and TPS were 26.8%, 36.2%, 42.9%, 2.84%, 25.4%, 34.6%, 34.2% and 30.9%, respectively. The combined detection of CEA+CA199+CA242+CA724 had higher sensitivity and specificity in gastric cancer (GC) and cardiac cancer, while CEA+CA199+CA242+SCC was the best combination of diagnosis for esophageal cancer (EC). Elevation of preoperative CEA, CA19-9 and CA24-2, SCC and CA72-4 was significantly associated with pathological types (p<0.05) and TNM staging (p<0.05). Correlation analysis showed that CA24-2 was significantly correlated with CA19-9 (r=0.810, p<0.001). The levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2, CA72-4 and SCC decreased obviously 3 months after operations. When metastasis and recurrence occurred, the levels of TMs significantly increased. On multivariate analysis, high preoperative CA72-4, CA24-2 and SCC served as prognostic factors for cardiac carcinoma, GC and EC, respectively. combined detection of CEA+CA199+CA242+SCC proved to be the most economic and practical strategy in diagnosis of EC; CEA+CA199+CA242+CA724 proved to be a better evaluation indicator for cardiac cancer and GC. CEA and CA19-9, CA24-2, CA72-4 and SCC, examined postoperatively during follow-up, were useful to find early tumor recurrence and metastasis, and evaluate prognosis. AFP, TPA and TPS have no significant value in diagnosis of patients with upper GIT cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25556459     DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.23.10267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  18 in total

1.  Nicotinamide N-methyltransferase: a potential biomarker for worse prognosis in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Xin Wang; Xing Huang; Hongmei Yong; Jiajia Shen; Qi Tang; Jin Zhu; Jian Ni; Zhenqing Feng
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Prognostic value of serum tumor abnormal protein in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Feng Lan; Ming Zhu; Qiufeng Qi; Yaping Zhang; Yongping Liu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-26

Review 3.  Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Carbohydrate Antigen 72-4 in Gastric Cancer: Is the Old Band Still Playing?

Authors:  Andrey Iskrenov Kotzev; Peter Vassilev Draganov
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2018-04-24

4.  Diagnostic value of combined detection of CA72-4, CA19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen comparing to CA72-4 alone in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huiping Wang; Weibiao Jin; Chuanqi Wan; Chen Zhu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.241

5.  CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dot-Labeled Lateral Flow Strips for Rapid and Quantitative Detection of Gastric Cancer Carbohydrate Antigen 72-4.

Authors:  Xinyu Yan; Kan Wang; Wenting Lu; Weijian Qin; Daxiang Cui; Jinghua He
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.703

6.  Understanding molecular markers in recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiation.

Authors:  Seema Gupta; Vandana Singh Kushwaha; Sandeep Verma; Huma Khan; M L B Bhatt; Nuzhat Husain; Mahendra Pal Singh Negi; Vivek Vidyadhar Bhosale; Ashim Ghatak
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2016-12-05

7.  Long non-coding RNA HULC as a novel serum biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis prediction of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chunjing Jin; Wei Shi; Feng Wang; Xianjuan Shen; Jing Qi; Hui Cong; Jie Yuan; Linying Shi; Bingying Zhu; Xi Luo; Yan Zhang; Shaoqing Ju
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-09

8.  Clinical significance and diagnostic value of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yao Liang; Wei Wang; Cheng Fang; Seeruttun Sharvesh Raj; Wan-Ming Hu; Qi-Wen Li; Zhi-Wei Zhou
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-02

Review 9.  Translational progress on tumor biomarkers.

Authors:  Hongwei Guo; Xiaolin Zhou; Yi Lu; Liye Xie; Qian Chen; Evan T Keller; Qian Liu; Qinghua Zhou; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Stage Association of Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen with Gastric Adenocarcinoma in Iranian Patients

Authors:  Afshin Shafaghi; Fariborz Mansour- Ghanaei; Farahnaz Joukar; Farhad Nabavi; Alireza Mansour- Ghanaei; Aidin Esrafilian Soltani
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.