Literature DB >> 25556304

Are we making the grade? Practices and reported efficacy measures of primate conservation education programs.

Katherine J Kling1, Mariah E Hopkins.   

Abstract

Conservation education is often employed alongside primate conservation efforts with the aim of changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward non-human primates. Recommended best-use practices include longevity, use of program incentives, collaboration among educators, and adaptive program assessment, among others. This study surveys primate conservation education programs (PCEPs) to assess the frequency of suggested best-use practices, and to investigate impacts on program efficacy. Online surveys were collected from PCEPs in 2013-2014 (N = 43). The majority of programs reported lengths of 5-10 years, with participant involvement ranging widely from a day to several years. Non-economic and economic incentives were distributed by approximately half of all programs, with programs that provided economic incentives reporting positive participant attitude changes more frequently than those that did not (P = 0.03). While >70% of PCEPs consulted with community leaders, local teachers, and research scientists, only 45.9% collaborated with other conservation educators and only 27% collaborated with cultural experts such as cultural anthropologists. Programs that collaborated with other conservation educators were more likely to report reductions in threats to primates, specifically to bushmeat hunting and capture of primates for the pet trade (P = 0.07). Formal program evaluations were employed by 72.1% of all programs, with the majority of programs using surveys to assess changes to participant attitudes and knowledge. Formal evaluations of participant behavior, community attitudes and behaviors, and threats to primate populations were less common. While results indicate that PCEPs follow many suggested best-use practices, program impacts may be enhanced by greater discussion of economic incentivization, increased collaboration between conservation educators, and improved commitment to adaptive evaluation of changes to behaviors in addition to attitudes and knowledge.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collaboration; community involvement; conservation education; efficacy; longevity; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25556304     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  2 in total

1.  Back to basics: Gaps in baseline data call for revisiting an environmental education program in the SAVA region, Madagascar.

Authors:  Marina B Blanco; Alexie N Rudman; Lydia K Greene; Fusiane Razafindrainibe; Lanto Andrianandrasana; Charles Welch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evidence-based conservation education in Mexican communities: Connecting arts and science.

Authors:  Montserrat Franquesa-Soler; Lucía Jorge-Sales; John F Aristizabal; Patricia Moreno-Casasola; Juan Carlos Serio-Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.