Literature DB >> 25556038

MRI scanning in patients with new and existing CapSureFix Novus 5076 pacemaker leads: randomized trial results.

Jayaprakash Shenthar1, Goran Milasinovic2, Ahmed Al Fagih3, Marco Götte4, Gregory Engel5, Steven Wolff6, Hung-Fat Tse7, Julie Herr8, John Carrithers8, Jeffrey Cerkvenik8, Claas Philip Nähle9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be safely performed in patients with magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional pacemaker systems but remains relatively contraindicated with non-MR-conditional pacemaker systems.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of MRI without positioning restrictions in patients with an MR-conditional pacemaker and currently a non-MR-conditional Medtronic CapSureFix Novus 5076 lead(s).
METHODS: The study randomized 266 patients in a 2:1 ratio to the MRI group (177 patients) or to the control group (89 patients). At 9-12 weeks postimplant, the MRI group underwent MRI at 1.5 T. Primary end points were MRI-related complication-free rate and noninferiority of the MRI group compared to the control group with regard to the proportion of patients with an increase of ≤0.5 V in right atrial (RA) and right ventricular (RV) pacing capture thresholds from immediately before MRI to 1-month after MRI.
RESULTS: No MRI-related complications occurred in 156 MRI-scanned patients who were followed through 1-month post-MRI. Differences in the proportion of patients with ≤0.5 V pacing capture threshold changes from pre-MRI to 1-month post-MRI were minimal between the groups for RA (proportions of 100% in both groups; a P value cannot be calculated) and RV leads (proportions of 99.3% in the MRI group and 100% in the control group; noninferiority test, P < .0001). Proportions of patients with acceptable sensing amplitude changes from pre-MRI to 1-month post-MRI were also similar between the 2 groups for RA and RV leads (noninferiority test, P < .0001 and P = .0004, respectively). No arrhythmias occurred during MRI.
CONCLUSION: MRI scans can be performed safely without positioning restrictions in patients with Medtronic CapSureFix Novus 5076 leads connected to an MR-conditional pacemaker.
Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25556038     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  5 in total

1.  An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Secchi; Giacomo D E Papini; Sara Foresti; Hussam Ali; Guido M G De Ambroggi; Antonio Sorgente; Gianluca Epicoco; Paola M Cannaò; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Viewpoint: Cardiac implantable electronic devices and magnetic resonance compatibility: was it really necessary?

Authors:  Richard Sutton; David G Benditt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Feasibility, safety, and potential demand of emergent brain magnetic resonance imaging of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Maki Ono; Makoto Suzuki; Mitsuaki Isobe
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2017-02-09

4.  Clinical safety of ProMRI implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems during head and lower lumbar magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Wolfgang Rudolf Bauer; Dennis H Lau; Christian Wollmann; Andrew McGavigan; Jacques Mansourati; Theresa Reiter; Simone Frömer; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Current Status and Issues Concerning Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with a Magnetic Resonance Conditional Cardiac Implantable Electrical Device: A Single-center Study.

Authors:  Yukitoshi Ikeya; Toshiko Nakai; Rikitake Kogawa; Sayaka Kurokawa; Koichi Nagashima; Ryuta Watanabe; Masaru Arai; Naoto Otsuka; Satoshi Kunimoto; Yasuo Okumura
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 1.271

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.