Literature DB >> 25555361

Intra-session test-retest reliability of magnitude and structure of center of pressure from the Nintendo Wii Balance Board™ for a visually impaired and normally sighted population.

Pamela E Jeter1, Jiangxia Wang2, Jialiang Gu3, Michael P Barry4, Crystal Roach5, Marilyn Corson6, Lindsay Yang7, Gislin Dagnelie8.   

Abstract

Individuals with visual impairment (VI) have irreparable damage to one of the input streams contributing to postural stability. Here, we evaluated the intra-session test-retest reliability of the Wii Balance Board (WBB) for measuring Center of Pressure (COP) magnitude and structure, i.e. approximate entropy (ApEn) in fourteen legally blind participants and 21 participants with corrected-to-normal vision. Participants completed a validated balance protocol which included four sensory conditions: double-leg standing on a firm surface with eyes open (EO-firm); a firm surface with eyes closed (EC-firm); a foam surface with EO (EO-foam); and a foam surface with EC (EC-foam). Participants performed the full balance protocol twice during the session, separated by a period of 15min, to determine the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Absolute reliability was determined by the standard error of measurement (SEM). The minimal difference (MD) was estimated to determine clinical significance for future studies. COP measures were derived from data sent by the WBB to a laptop via Bluetooth. COP scores increased with the difficulty of sensory condition indicating WBB sensitivity (all p<0.01). ICCs in the VI group ranged from 0.73 to 0.95, indicating high to very high correlations, and the normal group showed moderate to very high ICCs (0.62-0.94). The SEM was comparable between groups regardless of between-subject variability. The reliability of the WBB makes it practical to screen for balance impairment among VI persons.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Approximate entropy; Center of pressure; Reliability; Vision impairment; Wii Balance Board

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25555361      PMCID: PMC4385439          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  26 in total

1.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity.

Authors:  S M Pincus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  A nonlinear dynamic approach for evaluating postural control: new directions for the management of sport-related cerebral concussion.

Authors:  James T Cavanaugh; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Nintendo Wii Balance Board is sensitive to effects of visual tasks on standing sway in healthy elderly adults.

Authors:  Frank Koslucher; Michael G Wade; Brent Nelson; Kelvin Lim; Fu-Chen Chen; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance.

Authors:  Ross A Clark; Adam L Bryant; Yonghao Pua; Paul McCrory; Kim Bennell; Michael Hunt
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Approximate entropy for all signals.

Authors:  Ki Chon; Christopher G Scully; Sheng Lu
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.

Authors:  G Atkinson; A M Nevill
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Visual postural performance after loss of somatosensory and vestibular function.

Authors:  W Paulus; A Straube; T H Brandt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Assessing the influence of sensory interaction of balance. Suggestion from the field.

Authors:  A Shumway-Cook; F B Horak
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1986-10

9.  Physiological time-series analysis: what does regularity quantify?

Authors:  S M Pincus; A L Goldberger
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-04

10.  The Waterloo Vision and Mobility Study: postural control strategies in subjects with ARM.

Authors:  D B Elliott; A E Patla; J G Flanagan; S Spaulding; S Rietdyk; G Strong; S Brown
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  8 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability of the Wii Balance Board for assessing standing balance in young people with intellectual disability.

Authors:  R I Martínez-Lemos; Cárlos Ayán-Pérez; Sara Bouzas-Rico
Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil       Date:  2017-12-18

2.  The relationship between attention and static balance disturbance in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Amir Dana; Amir Shams; Nahid Allafan; Alireza Bahrami
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Ashtanga-Based Yoga Therapy Increases the Sensory Contribution to Postural Stability in Visually-Impaired Persons at Risk for Falls as Measured by the Wii Balance Board: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Pamela E Jeter; Steffany Haaz Moonaz; Ava K Bittner; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing postural stability via the correlation patterns of vertical ground reaction force components.

Authors:  Chih-Yuan Hong; Lan-Yuen Guo; Rong Song; Mark L Nagurka; Jia-Li Sung; Chen-Wen Yen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Anodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex improves motor imagery benefits on postural control: A pilot study.

Authors:  Elodie Saruco; Franck Di Rienzo; Susana Nunez-Nagy; Miguel A Rubio-Gonzalez; Philip L Jackson; Christian Collet; Arnaud Saimpont; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Optimal Combination of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulations and Motor Imagery Interventions.

Authors:  Elodie Saruco; Franck Di Rienzo; Susana Nunez-Nagy; Miguel A Rubio-Gonzalez; Ursula Debarnot; Christian Collet; Aymeric Guillot; Arnaud Saimpont
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Comparative analysis of postural control and vertical jump performance between three different measurement devices.

Authors:  Christopher Blosch; Robin Schäfer; Markus de Marées; Petra Platen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Maintaining Balance when Looking at a Virtual Reality Three-Dimensional Display of a Field of Moving Dots or at a Virtual Reality Scene.

Authors:  Elodie Chiarovano; Catherine de Waele; Hamish G MacDougall; Stephen J Rogers; Ann M Burgess; Ian S Curthoys
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.