Literature DB >> 25555313

Intrafractional organs movement in three-dimensional image-guided adaptive pulsed-dose-rate cervical cancer brachytherapy: assessment and dosimetric impact.

Renaud Mazeron1, Jérôme Champoudry2, Jennifer Gilmore3, Isabelle Dumas2, Jennifer Goulart3, Anne-Sophie Oberlander3, Eleonor Rivin del Campo3, Ibrahima Diallo4, Dimitri Lefkopoulos5, Christine Haie-Meder3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the intrafractional movements of organs at risk (OARs) and their dosimetric impact during the delivery of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An MRI on Day 1 was used for treatment planning in 19 patients. CT scans were acquired at Days 1, 2, and 3 with delineation of the OARs. The MRI plan was transferred to each CT. The intersection volume between the 10 Gy isodose and the OARs were monitored, reflecting movement. Lower dose evaluated in the maximally exposed 0.1 cm(3) of an organ and lower dose evaluated in the maximally exposed 2 cm(3) of an organ (D(2cm3)) were evaluated on each CT and compared. Results were averaged considering that each CT reflected one-third of the treatment course to evaluate the delivered dose.
RESULTS: No major movements of the sigmoid and bladder were observed, whereas the rectum got significantly closer to the implant at Day 2. The consequence was an increase of 6% ± 5.3 (3.7 Gy, α/β = 3 Gy) of the delivered D(2cm3) from the planned dose, in contrast to 0.2% ± 6.1 for the bladder and 1.1% ± 6.4 for the sigmoid. The increase of the D(2cm3) of the rectum was reported in 17 patients, ranging from 0.4 to 9.4 Gy, leading to a 10.5% overcoming of the dose constraint (75 Gy). Similar tendencies were reported for lower dose evaluated in the maximally exposed 0.1 cm(3) of an organ.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant systematic variation was observed for the rectum (+3.7 Gy). As significant random variations were observed, caution should be exercised when the planned D(2cm3) is close to the dose constraints.
Copyright © 2015 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy; Movements; Organs at risk; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25555313     DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brachytherapy        ISSN: 1538-4721            Impact factor:   2.362


  7 in total

1.  Excess dose-related parameters (Vex, Rex, and iRex): novel predictors and late toxicity correlations in cervical cancer image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.

Authors:  Tissana Prasartseree; Pittaya Dankulchai; Peter J Hoskin
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-10-30

Review 2.  Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus: progress in radiotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Rob Glynne-Jones; David Tan; Robert Hughes; Peter Hoskin
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Review on Treatment Planning Systems for Cervix Brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy): Some Desirable and Convenient Practical Aspects to Be Implemented from Radiation Oncologist and Medical Physics Perspectives.

Authors:  Antonio Otal; Francisco Celada; Jose Chimeno; Javier Vijande; Santiago Pellejero; Maria-Jose Perez-Calatayud; Elena Villafranca; Naiara Fuentemilla; Francisco Blazquez; Silvia Rodriguez; Jose Perez-Calatayud
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Statistical Analysis of Interfraction Dose Variations of High-Risk Clinical Target Volume and Organs at Risk for Cervical Cancer High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Brien Washington; Marcus Randall; Denise Fabian; Dennis Cheek; Chi Wang; Wei Luo
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-19

5.  Early clinical outcomes of hybrid brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: making adverse situations in a favorable scenario.

Authors:  Leonel Varela Cagetti; Christophe Zemmour; Eric Lambaudie; Magalie Provansal; Renaud Sabatier; Laura Sabiani; Guillaume Blache; Camille Jauffret; Marjorie Ferré; Agnès Tallet; Laurence Gonzague
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2022-08-17

6.  Dose comparison between prescription methods according to anatomical variations in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Euncheol Choi; Jae Ho Kim; Ok Bae Kim; Sang Jun Byun; Jin Hee Kim; Young Kee Oh
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2018-09-30

7.  First clinical experience with a novel, mobile cone-beam CT system for treatment quality assurance in brachytherapy.

Authors:  Andre Karius; Vratislav Strnad; Michael Lotter; Stephan Kreppner; Christoph Bert
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 4.033

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.