Literature DB >> 25555240

Volume estimation of low-contrast lesions with CT: a comparison of performances from a phantom study, simulations and theoretical analysis.

Qin Li1, Marios A Gavrielides, Rongping Zeng, Kyle J Myers, Berkman Sahiner, Nicholas Petrick.   

Abstract

Measurements of lung nodule volume with multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) have been shown to be more accurate and precise compared to conventional lower dimensional measurements. Quantifying the size of lesions is potentially more difficult when the object-to-background contrast is low as with lesions in the liver. Physical phantom and simulation studies are often utilized to analyze the bias and variance of lesion size estimates because a ground truth or reference standard can be established. In addition, it may also be useful to derive theoretical bounds as another way of characterizing lesion sizing methods. The goal of this work was to study the performance of a MDCT system for a lesion volume estimation task with object-to-background contrast less than 50 HU, and to understand the relation among performances obtained from phantom study, simulation and theoretical analysis. We performed both phantom and simulation studies, and analyzed the bias and variance of volume measurements estimated by a matched-filter-based estimator. We further corroborated results with a theoretical analysis to estimate the achievable performance bound, which was the Cramer-Rao's lower bound (CRLB) of minimum variance for the size estimates. Results showed that estimates of non-attached solid small lesion volumes with object-to-background contrast of 31-46 HU can be accurate and precise, with less than 10.8% in percent bias and 4.8% in standard deviation of percent error (SPE), in standard dose scans. These results are consistent with theoretical (CRLB), computational (simulation) and empirical phantom bounds. The difference between the bounds is rather small (for SPE less than 1.9%) indicating that the theoretical- and simulation-based performance bounds can be good surrogates for physical phantom studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25555240      PMCID: PMC5567810          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/2/671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility.

Authors:  Dag Wormanns; Gerhard Kohl; Ernst Klotz; Anke Marheine; Florian Beyer; Walter Heindel; Stefan Diederich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Accuracy of automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules across different multislice CT scanners.

Authors:  Marco Das; Julia Ley-Zaporozhan; H A Gietema; Andre Czech; Georg Mühlenbruch; Andreas H Mahnken; Markus Katoh; Annemarie Bakai; Marcos Salganicoff; Stefan Diederich; Mathias Prokop; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Noncalcified lung nodules: volumetric assessment with thoracic CT.

Authors:  Marios A Gavrielides; Lisa M Kinnard; Kyle J Myers; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Computer-aided volumetry of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity at MDCT.

Authors:  Seitaro Oda; Kazuo Awai; Kohei Murao; Akio Ozawa; Yumi Yanaga; Koichi Kawanaka; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Evaluating variability in tumor measurements from same-day repeat CT scans of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Binsheng Zhao; Leonard P James; Chaya S Moskowitz; Pingzhen Guo; Michelle S Ginsberg; Robert A Lefkowitz; Yilin Qin; Gregory J Riely; Mark G Kris; Lawrence H Schwartz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Benefit of overlapping reconstruction for improving the quantitative assessment of CT lung nodule volume.

Authors:  Marios A Gavrielides; Rongping Zeng; Kyle J Myers; Berkman Sahiner; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Maximum-Likelihood Estimation With a Contracting-Grid Search Algorithm.

Authors:  Jacob Y Hesterman; Luca Caucci; Matthew A Kupinski; Harrison H Barrett; Lars R Furenlid
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Volume assessment accuracy in computed tomography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Nicolas D Prionas; Shonket Ray; John M Boone
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  8 in total

1.  Volume estimation of multidensity nodules with thoracic computed tomography.

Authors:  Marios A Gavrielides; Qin Li; Rongping Zeng; Kyle J Myers; Berkman Sahiner; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-01-29

2.  Evaluation of Simulated Lesions as Surrogates to Clinical Lesions for Thoracic CT Volumetry: The Results of an International Challenge.

Authors:  Marthony Robins; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Nancy A Obuchowski; Andrew Buckler; Maria Athelogou; Rudresh Jarecha; Nicholas Petrick; Aria Pezeshk; Berkman Sahiner; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Systematic analysis of bias and variability of texture measurements in computed tomography.

Authors:  Marthony Robins; Justin Solomon; Jocelyn Hoye; Ehsan Abadi; Daniele Marin; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-07-12

4.  Techniques for virtual lung nodule insertion: volumetric and morphometric comparison of projection-based and image-based methods for quantitative CT.

Authors:  Marthony Robins; Justin Solomon; Pooyan Sahbaee; Martin Sedlmair; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Aria Pezeshk; Berkman Sahiner; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Inter-Method Performance Study of Tumor Volumetry Assessment on Computed Tomography Test-Retest Data.

Authors:  Andrew J Buckler; Jovanna Danagoulian; Kjell Johnson; Adele Peskin; Marios A Gavrielides; Nicholas Petrick; Nancy A Obuchowski; Hubert Beaumont; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Rudresh Jarecha; Jan-Martin Kuhnigk; Ninad Mantri; Michael McNitt-Gray; Jan H Moltz; Gergely Nyiri; Sam Peterson; Pierre Tervé; Christian Tietjen; Etienne von Lavante; Xiaonan Ma; Samantha St Pierre; Maria Athelogou
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Towards Estimating the Uncertainty Associated with Three-Dimensional Geometry Reconstructed from Medical Image Data.

Authors:  Marc Horner; Stephen M Luke; Kerim O Genc; Todd M Pietila; Ross T Cotton; Benjamin A Ache; Zachary H Levine; Kevin C Townsend
Journal:  J Verif Valid Uncertain Quantif       Date:  2019

7.  Estimability index for volume quantification of homogeneous spherical lesions in computed tomography.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Marthony Robins; Baiyu Chen; Greeshma Agasthya
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-12-11

8.  Task-dependent estimability index to assess the quality of cardiac computed tomography angiography for quantifying coronary stenosis.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Taylor Richards; William P Segars; Melissa A Daubert; Alex Ivanov; Geoffrey D Rubin; Pamela S Douglas; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-01-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.