Literature DB >> 25555182

The benefit-to-risk ratio of common treatments in PCOS: effect of oral contraceptives versus metformin on atherogenic markers.

Charikleia Christakou, Anastasios Kollias, Christina Piperi, Ilias Katsikis, Dimitrios Panidis, Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of oral contraceptives (OCPs) and metformin on atherogenic markers, including serum levels of advanced glycated end products (AGEs) and C-reactive protein (CRP), in lean women (Body Mass Index below 25 kg/m(2)) with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), defined by NIH criteria.
DESIGN: Prospective open-label study.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty women with PCOS were treated for 6 months with one of the following treatments: ethinylestradiol plus cyproterone acetate (OCP 1, n=40) or ethinylestradiol plus drospirenone (OCP2, n=40) or metformin (MET, n=40). The three groups were age and BMI-matched (mean age: 22 ± 0.56 yrs in group OCP1; 23.24 ± 0.64 yrs in group OCP2; 21.50 ± 0.53 yrs in group MET; mean BMI 21.80 ± 0.35 kg/m(2) in group OCP1; 22.37 ± 0.48 kg/m(2) in group OCP2; 23.03 ± 0.67 kg/m(2) in group MET). At 6 months serum AGEs were decreased in group OCP1 (P=0.005) and group MET (P=0.001), whereas these were marginally decreased in group OCP2 (P=0.069). Treatment with metformin was associated with a greater percent decrease of AGEs. CRP was decreased with metformin (P<0.001), but was increased with OCPs (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluates common therapeutic options in women with PCOS by reconsidering and prioritizing the goals of treatment. OCPs and metformin appear to have differential effects on atherogenic molecules in lean PCOS patients, but metformin was superior in reducing serum AGEs and CRP. Clinicians should individualize the benefit-to-risk ratio of pharmaceutical intervention in women with PCOS in order to choose the formulation with the greatest overall efficacy as well as safety in terms of cardiovascular risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25555182     DOI: 10.14310/horm.2002.1553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hormones (Athens)        ISSN: 1109-3099            Impact factor:   2.885


  8 in total

1.  How to manage the reproductive issues of PCOS: a 2015 integrated endocrinological and gynecological consensus statement of the Italian Society of Endocrinology.

Authors:  P Moghetti; E Carmina; V De Leo; A Lanzone; F Orio; R Pasquali; V Toscano
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Aspects of Cardiometabolic Risk in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Thomas S Paterakis; Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2014-12

Review 3.  Prospective Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Normal Weight Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Dorte Glintborg; Naja Due Kolster; Pernille Ravn; Marianne Skovsager Andersen
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-20

4.  Metformin versus the combined oral contraceptive pill for hirsutism, acne, and menstrual pattern in polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Eloise Fraison; Elena Kostova; Lisa J Moran; Sophia Bilal; Carolyn C Ee; Christos Venetis; Michael F Costello
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-13

5.  Myo-Inositol in the Treatment of Teenagers Affected by PCOS.

Authors:  Lali Pkhaladze; Ludmila Barbakadze; Nana Kvashilava
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.257

6.  Consensus Statement on the Use of Oral Contraceptive Pills in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Women in India.

Authors:  Duru Shah; Madhuri Patil
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 7.  Risks, benefits size and clinical implications of combined oral contraceptive use in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Sebastião Freitas de Medeiros
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 8.  Therapeutic Potentials of Low-Dose Tacrolimus for Aberrant Endometrial Features in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Ahmad J H Albaghdadi; Frederick W K Kan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.