Xabier Altuna1, Juan José Navarro2, Idoia Palicio2, Leire Álvarez2. 1. Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, España. Electronic address: xaltuna@osakidetza.net. 2. Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, España.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The classic surgical procedure for percutaneous bone-anchored hearing devices involves removal of a large area of subcutaneous tissue down to the periosteum. This leads to alopecia and raises the risk of devascularization of the overlying skin with the potential for infection and scarring. The objective of this study was to determine the results of implant placement using a single, linear incision with no underlying soft tissue reduction. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective study was conducted in our hospital over a period of 14 months in all consecutive surgeries performed using this technique in adults. Patients were reviewed regularly (week 1, week 3, weeks 4-6 and months 3, 6 and 12) to assess wound healing including evaluation with the Holgers scale. RESULTS: Corresponding to 34 patients, 34 cases were consecutively enrolled in this study. We found that 15% of the patients had minor skin reactions during the first visit (Holgers grade 1 or 2); this number raised to 20% in week 3, but at week 4 only 1 patient had a reaction score of 1 (which was solved by week 6). None of the cases required revision surgery and all skin reactions were treated topically. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the tissue preservation technique is a simple and effective insertion technique with a favourable healing process and cosmesis.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The classic surgical procedure for percutaneous bone-anchored hearing devices involves removal of a large area of subcutaneous tissue down to the periosteum. This leads to alopecia and raises the risk of devascularization of the overlying skin with the potential for infection and scarring. The objective of this study was to determine the results of implant placement using a single, linear incision with no underlying soft tissue reduction. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective study was conducted in our hospital over a period of 14 months in all consecutive surgeries performed using this technique in adults. Patients were reviewed regularly (week 1, week 3, weeks 4-6 and months 3, 6 and 12) to assess wound healing including evaluation with the Holgers scale. RESULTS: Corresponding to 34 patients, 34 cases were consecutively enrolled in this study. We found that 15% of the patients had minor skin reactions during the first visit (Holgers grade 1 or 2); this number raised to 20% in week 3, but at week 4 only 1 patient had a reaction score of 1 (which was solved by week 6). None of the cases required revision surgery and all skin reactions were treated topically. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the tissue preservation technique is a simple and effective insertion technique with a favourable healing process and cosmesis.
Authors: F DI Giustino; P Vannucchi; R Pecci; A Mengucci; R Santimone; B Giannoni Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.124
Authors: Ruben M Strijbos; Christine A den Besten; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-04-16 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Ruben M Strijbos; Louise V Straatman; Tim G A Calon; Martin L Johansson; Arthur J G de Bruijn; Herbert van den Berge; Mariette Wagenaar; Edwin Eichhorn; Miranda Janssen; Sofia Jonhede; Joost van Tongeren; Marcus Holmberg; Robert Stokroos Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 4.003