Literature DB >> 25553668

Progressive aortic valve calcification: three-dimensional visualization and biomechanical analysis.

Rotem Halevi1, Ashraf Hamdan2, Gil Marom3, Mor Mega1, Ehud Raanani4, Rami Haj-Ali5.   

Abstract

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a progressive pathology characterized by calcification mainly within the cusps of the aortic valve (AV). As CAVD advances, the blood flow and associated hemodynamics are severely altered, thus influencing the mechanical performance of the AV. This study proposes a new method, termed reverse calcification technique (RCT) capable of re-creating the different calcification growth stages. The RCT is based on three-dimensional (3D) spatial computed tomography (CT) distributions of the calcification density from patient-specific scans. By repeatedly subtracting the calcification voxels with the lowest Hounsfield unit (HU), only high calcification density volume is presented. RCT posits that this volume re-creation represents earlier calcification stages and may help identify CAVD initiation sites. The technique has been applied to scans from 12 patients (36 cusps) with severe aortic stenosis who underwent CT before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Four typical calcification geometries and growth patterns were identified. Finite elements (FE) analysis was applied to compare healthy AV structural response with two selected CAVD-RCT configurations. The orifice area decreased from 2.9cm(2) for the healthy valve to 1.4cm(2) for the moderate stenosis case. Local maximum strain magnitude of 0.24 was found on the edges of the calcification compared to 0.17 in the healthy AV, suggesting a direct relation between strain concentration and calcification geometries. The RCT may help predict CAVD progression in patients at early stages of the disease. The RCT allows a realistic FE mechanical simulation and performance of calcified AVs.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve; CAVD; Calcification; Finite element; Hounsfield Unit; RCT; Stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25553668     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  Fluid-structure interaction modeling of calcific aortic valve disease using patient-specific three-dimensional calcification scans.

Authors:  Rotem Halevi; Ashraf Hamdan; Gil Marom; Karin Lavon; Sagit Ben-Zekry; Ehud Raanani; Danny Bluestein; Rami Haj-Ali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Progressive Calcification in Bicuspid Valves: A Coupled Hemodynamics and Multiscale Structural Computations.

Authors:  Karin Lavon; Adi Morany; Rotem Halevi; Ashraf Hamdan; Ehud Raanani; Danny Bluestein; Rami Haj-Ali
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Impact of different aortic valve calcification patterns on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A finite element study.

Authors:  Francesco Sturla; Mattia Ronzoni; Mattia Vitali; Annalisa Dimasi; Riccardo Vismara; Georgia Preston-Maher; Gaetano Burriesci; Emiliano Votta; Alberto Redaelli
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Discrete multi-physics: A mesh-free model of blood flow in flexible biological valve including solid aggregate formation.

Authors:  Mostapha Ariane; Mohamed Hatem Allouche; Marco Bussone; Fausto Giacosa; Frédéric Bernard; Mostafa Barigou; Alessio Alexiadis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The Haemodynamic and Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease.

Authors:  Lydia Hanna; Chlöe Armour; Xiao Yun Xu; Richard Gibbs
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-03

6.  Population-specific material properties of the implantation site for transcatheter aortic valve replacement finite element simulations.

Authors:  Giorgia M Bosi; Claudio Capelli; Mun Hong Cheang; Nicola Delahunty; Michael Mullen; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Comparing the Role of Mechanical Forces in Vascular and Valvular Calcification Progression.

Authors:  Madeleine A Gomel; Romi Lee; K Jane Grande-Allen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-01-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.