Literature DB >> 25553544

Evaluating the effectiveness of management practices on hydrology and water quality at watershed scale with a rainfall-runoff model.

Yaoze Liu1, Vincent F Bralts1, Bernard A Engel2.   

Abstract

The adverse influence of urban development on hydrology and water quality can be reduced by applying best management practices (BMPs) and low impact development (LID) practices. This study applied green roof, rain barrel/cistern, bioretention system, porous pavement, permeable patio, grass strip, grassed swale, wetland channel, retention pond, detention basin, and wetland basin, on Crooked Creek watershed. The model was calibrated and validated for annual runoff volume. A framework for simulating BMPs and LID practices at watershed scales was created, and the impacts of BMPs and LID practices on water quantity and water quality were evaluated with the Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment-Low Impact Development 2.1 (L-THIA-LID 2.1) model for 16 scenarios. The various levels and combinations of BMPs/LID practices reduced runoff volume by 0 to 26.47%, Total Nitrogen (TN) by 0.30 to 34.20%, Total Phosphorus (TP) by 0.27 to 47.41%, Total Suspended Solids (TSS) by 0.33 to 53.59%, Lead (Pb) by 0.30 to 60.98%, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) by 0 to 26.70%, and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) by 0 to 27.52%. The implementation of grass strips in 25% of the watershed where this practice could be applied was the most cost-efficient scenario, with cost per unit reduction of $1m3/yr for runoff, while cost for reductions of two pollutants of concern was $445 kg/yr for Total Nitrogen (TN) and $4871 kg/yr for Total Phosphorous (TP). The scenario with very high levels of BMP and LID practice adoption (scenario 15) reduced runoff volume and pollutant loads from 26.47% to 60.98%, and provided the greatest reduction in runoff volume and pollutant loads among all scenarios. However, this scenario was not as cost-efficient as most other scenarios. The L-THIA-LID 2.1 model is a valid tool that can be applied to various locations to help identify cost effective BMP/LID practice plans at watershed scales.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Best management practices; Cost-effective; L-THIA; Low impact development practices; Modeling; Runoff; Water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25553544     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  Retrofitting LID Practices into Existing Neighborhoods: Is It Worth It?

Authors:  Timothy J Wright; Yaoze Liu; Natalie J Carroll; Laurent M Ahiablame; Bernard A Engel
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Spatio-temporal characteristics of livestock and their effects on pollution in China based on geographic information system.

Authors:  Ruimin Liu; Fei Xu; Yongyan Liu; Jiawei Wang; Wenwen Yu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Citizen Science-Informed Community Master Planning: Land Use and Built Environment Changes to Increase Flood Resilience and Decrease Contaminant Exposure.

Authors:  Galen Newman; Tianqi Shi; Zhen Yao; Dongying Li; Garett Sansom; Katie Kirsch; Gaston Casillas; Jennifer Horney
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.