| Literature DB >> 25553524 |
Bryan S Lee1, Sumeet Vadera2, Jorge A Gonzalez-Martinez3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The role of shunt placement is to divert cerebrospinal fluid from within the ventricles to an alternative location in the setting of hydrocephalus. One of the rare shunt complications is distal catheter migration, and various body sites have been reported, including the scrotum. Although cases of scrotal migration of distal catheter have been reported in pediatric patients, cases in adult patients are rare due to obliterated processus vaginalis. Furthermore, there has not been a case reported for scrotal migration in an adult at an early onset. PRESENTATION OF CASE: 65-year-old male underwent shunt placement for normal-pressure hydrocephalus-like symptoms. On post-operative day seven patient developed right testicular edema, for which ultrasound was performed, revealing hydrocele along with the presence of distal catheter in the scrotum. On post-operative day nine patient underwent distal catheter trimming via laparoscopic approach with general surgery, with post-operative imaging showing satisfactory location of distal catheter in the peritoneal cavity. DISCUSSION/Entities:
Keywords: Hydrocele; Post-operative shunt complications; Scrotal migration; Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
Year: 2014 PMID: 25553524 PMCID: PMC4334951 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.09.032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2210-2612
Fig. 1Testicular US showing hydrocele and presence of catheter in scrotum.
Fig. 2Abdominal X-ray confirming distal catheter migration.
Fig. 3Post-operative abdominal X-ray after distal catheter trimming.
Summary of previous cases of scrotal migration of VPS.
| Authors | Age of migration | Interval time | Affected side | Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agarwal et al. | 36 weeks | 3 weeks | Right (Rt) | Repositioning of distal catheter, inguinal hernia repair |
| Albala et al. | 14 months | 7 months after revision | Rt | Repositioning of distal catheter, hernia sac reduction |
| Ammar et al. | 6 months | 2 months | Left (Lt) | VPS removal and reinsertion |
| Bristow et al. | 10 months | 1 day | Rt | Shortening of distal catheter |
| Clarnette et al. | 25 patients (age range from less than 8 weeks to 64 weeks, mean 48 weeks) | Not reported | Hydrocele reported: Bilateral 14, 4 Lt, 7 Rt (side of catheter migration not reported) | Not reported |
| Crofford et al. | 4 patients (38 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 4 years) | 5 months, 3 months, 1 month, 2 months, respectively | Rt, Rt, Rt, Lt, respectively | Repositioning of catheter and processus vaginalis closure |
| Fuwa et al. | 13 months | 12 weeks | Rt | Catheter removal via inguinal incision and inguinal hernia repair |
| Goh et al. | 4 months | Near 4 months | Rt | Processus vaginalis closure |
| Ho et al. | 14 years | 1 year after fractured catheter revision | Lt | Shunt removal via scrotal incision and repair of hernia sac |
| Jamjoom et al. | 14 months | 2 months | Rt | Replacement of catheter and processus vaginalis closure |
| Karaosmanoglu et al. | 14 months | Not reported | Rt | Distal catheter removal |
| Kita et al. | 5 years | 4 months | Lt | Processus vaginalis closure |
| Kobayashi et al. | 2 patients (23 days, 45 months) | 3 days, 9 months, respectively | Rt | Catheter removal via groin incision, inguinal hernia repair, and subsequent processus vaginalis closure |
| Kowk et al. | 31 weeks | 1 week after revision | Bilateral (old catheter in Rt and new catheter in Lt) | Removal of old catheter via groin incision, repositioning of new catheter, processus vaginalis closure |
| Lee et al. (present case) | 65 years | 7 days | Rt | Laparoscopic distal catheter trimming |
| Levey et al. | 29 days | 6 days | Rt | Catheter repositioning via scrotal and inguinal incision |
| Mohammadi et al. | 7 months | 5 months | Rt | Exploratoy laparotomy for distal catheter repositioning and processus vaginalis closure |
| Oktem et al. | 4 patients (10 months, 2.5 months, 9 days, 2.5 months) | 6 months, 5 months, 4 months, 1 day, respectively | Rt, Rt, Rt, Lt, respectively | Repositioning of catheter and processus vaginalis closure |
| Ozveren et al. | 3 days | 1 day | Rt | Replacement of catheter into peritoneum and inguinal hernia repair |
| Prabhu et al. | Not reported | 15 months | Lt | Removal of catheter and processus vaginalis closure |
| Rahman et al. | 4 years | 1 month | Rt | Processus vaginalis closure |
| Ram et al. | 3 years | 2.5 years | Rt | Shortening of distal catheter via open abdominal incision |
| Ramani et al. | 12 days | 5 months | Rt | Repositioning of catheter via groin incision |
| Rehm et al. | 46 years | 4 years | Rt | VPS revision with distal catheter truncation |
| Rivero-Garvia et al. | 6 years | 5 years | Rt | Processus vaginalis closure |
| Scherzer et al. | 2 patients (3 months, 2 months) | 13 days, 35 days respectively | Lt, Rt, respectively | Repositioning of catheter and inguinal hernia repair |
| Shahizon et al. | 3 years | Not reported | Rt | Removal of shunt catheter and inguinal hernia repair |
| Silver et al. | 14 years | 7 months after revision | Lt | Removal of distal catheter and inguinal hernia repair |
| Walsh et al. | 17 months | 6 months | Rt | Not reported |
| Ward et al. | 18 months | 7 months | Rt | Repositioning of catheter and processus vaginalis closure |
| Wong et al. | 7 months | 4 weeks | Rt | Repositioning of distal shunt |