Literature DB >> 25553201

Effect of a dual inlet channel on cell loading in microfluidics.

Hoyoung Yun1, Kisoo Kim2, Won Gu Lee2.   

Abstract

Unwanted sedimentation and attachment of a number of cells onto the bottom channel often occur on relatively large-scale inlets of conventional microfluidic channels as a result of gravity and fluid shear. Phenomena such as sedimentation have become recognized problems that can be overcome by performing microfluidic experiments properly, such as by calculating a meaningful output efficiency with respect to real input. Here, we present a dual-inlet design method for reducing cell loss at the inlet of channels by adding a new " upstream inlet " to a single main inlet design. The simple addition of an upstream inlet can create a vertically layered sheath flow prior to the main inlet for cell loading. The bottom layer flow plays a critical role in preventing the cells from attaching to the bottom of the channel entrance, resulting in a low possibility of cell sedimentation at the main channel entrance. To provide proof-of-concept validation, we applied our design to a microfabricated flow cytometer system (μFCS) and compared the cell counting efficiency of the proposed μFCS with that of the previous single-inlet μFCS and conventional FCS. We used human white blood cells and fluorescent microspheres to quantitatively evaluate the rate of cell sedimentation in the main inlet and to measure fluorescence sensitivity at the detection zone of the flow cytometer microchip. Generating a sheath flow as the bottom layer was meaningfully used to reduce the depth of field as well as the relative deviation of targets in the z-direction (compared to the x-y flow plane), leading to an increased counting sensitivity of fluorescent detection signals. Counting results using fluorescent microspheres showed both a 40% reduction in the rate of sedimentation and a 2-fold higher sensitivity in comparison with the single-inlet μFCS. The results of CD4(+) T-cell counting also showed that the proposed design results in a 25% decrease in the rate of cell sedimentation and a 28% increase in sensitivity when compared to the single-inlet μFCS. This method is simple and easy to use in design, yet requires no additional time or cost in fabrication. Furthermore, we expect that this approach could potentially be helpful for calculating exact cell loading and counting efficiency for a small input number of cells, such as primary cells and rare cells, in microfluidic channel applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25553201      PMCID: PMC4235624          DOI: 10.1063/1.4901929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  18 in total

1.  Instrumentation for flow cytometry.

Authors:  G V Chapman
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2000-09-21       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Expansion channel for microchip flow cytometers.

Authors:  Hyunwoo Bang; Hoyoung Yun; Won Gu Lee; Junha Park; Joonmo Lee; Seok Chung; Keunchang Cho; Chanil Chung; Dong-Chul Han; Jun Keun Chang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  An impulsive, electropulsation-driven backflow in microchannels during electroporation.

Authors:  Won Gu Lee; Hyunwoo Bang; Hoyoung Yun; Junggi Min; Chanil Chung; Jun Keun Chang; Dong-Chul Han
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Three-dimensional microfluidic devices fabricated in layered paper and tape.

Authors:  Andres W Martinez; Scott T Phillips; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A microfluidic device for uniform-sized cell spheroids formation, culture, harvesting and flow cytometry analysis.

Authors:  Bishnubrata Patra; Ying-Hua Chen; Chien-Chung Peng; Shiang-Chi Lin; Chau-Hwang Lee; Yi-Chung Tung
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Benchtop fabrication of three-dimensional reconfigurable microfluidic devices from paper-polymer composite.

Authors:  Yu Long Han; Wenqi Wang; Jie Hu; Guoyou Huang; Shuqi Wang; Won Gu Lee; Tian Jian Lu; Feng Xu
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Sequential multi-molecule delivery using vortex-assisted electroporation.

Authors:  Hoyoung Yun; Soojung Claire Hur
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 8.  Cell manipulation in microfluidics.

Authors:  Hoyoung Yun; Kisoo Kim; Won Gu Lee
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 9.954

9.  Differential electronic detector to monitor apoptosis using dielectrophoresis-induced translation of flowing cells (dielectrophoresis cytometry).

Authors:  Marija Nikolic-Jaric; Tim Cabel; Elham Salimi; Ashlesha Bhide; Katrin Braasch; Michael Butler; Greg E Bridges; Douglas J Thomson
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 10.  Microscale electroporation: challenges and perspectives for clinical applications.

Authors:  Won Gu Lee; Utkan Demirci; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.192

View more
  1 in total

1.  Micro-respirometry of whole cells and isolated mitochondria.

Authors:  Yan Levitsky; David J Pegouske; Sandra S Hammer; Nathan L Frantz; Kiera P Fisher; Artem B Muchnik; Anand R Saripalli; Philip Kirschner; Jason N Bazil; Julia V Busik; Denis A Proshlyakov
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.036

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.