Literature DB >> 25552994

Crystal structures of three lead(II) acetate-bridged di-amino-benzene coordination polymers.

David K Geiger1, Dylan E Parsons1, Patricia L Zick1.   

Abstract

Poly[tris-(acetato-κ(2) O,O')(μ2-acetato-κ(3) O,O':O)tetra-kis-(μ3-acetato-κ(4) O,O':O:O')bis-(benzene-1,2-di-amineN)tetra-lead(II)], [Pb4(CH3COO)8(C6H8N2)2] n , (I), poly[(acetato-κ(2) O,O')(μ3-acetato-κ(4) O,O':O:O')(4-chloro-benzene-1,2-diamineN)lead(II)], [Pb(CH3COO)2(C6H7ClN2)] n , (II), and poly[(κ(2) O,O')(μ3-acetato-κ(4) O,O':O:O')(3,4-di-amino-benzo-nitrileN)lead(II)], [Pb(CH3COO)2(C7H7N3)] n , (III), have polymeric structures in which monomeric units are joined by bridging acetate ligands. All of the Pb(II) ions exhibit hemidirected coordination. The repeating unit in (I) is composed of four Pb(II) ions having O6, O6N, O7 and O6N coordination spheres, respectively, where N represents a monodentate benzene-1,2-di-amine ligand and O acetate O atoms. Chains along [010] are joined by bridging acetate ligands to form planes parallel to (10-1). (II) and (III) are isotypic and have one Pb(II) ion in the asymmetric unit that has an O6N coordination sphere. Pb2O2 units result from a symmetry-imposed inversion center. Polymeric chains parallel to [100] exhibit hydrogen bonding between the amine and acetate ligands. In (III), additional hydrogen bonds between cyano groups and non-coordinating amines join the chains by forming R 2 (2)(14) rings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benzene-1,2-di­amine; coordination polymer; crystal structure; hemidirected coordination; hydrogen bonds; lead(II)

Year:  2014        PMID: 25552994      PMCID: PMC4257386          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814025380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Chemical context

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are of inherent inter­est in areas such as gas storage, catalysis, chemical sensors and mol­ecular separation (Dey et al., 2014 ▶; Kreno et al., 2012 ▶; Farha & Hupp, 2010 ▶). Recently, we reported the synthesis and structural characterization of two zinc MOFs possessing bridging acetate ligands and monodentate chloro- or cyano-substituted o-phenyl­enedi­amine ligands (Geiger & Parsons, 2014 ▶). These complexes possess a ladder–chain structure with an ethanol mol­ecule that occupies a void with a volume of approximately 224 Å3. The results presented here expand the structural study to PbII analogues. PbII compounds often exhibit a distorted coordination sphere or open coordination site that has been attributed to stereoactive ‘lone-pair’ electrons (Morsali, 2004 ▶; Wang & Liebau, 2007 ▶; Park & Barbier, 2001 ▶). Indeed, hemidirected geometry is favored over halodirected geometry for PbII when hard ligands are present, which corresponds to a greater ionic character in the metal–ligand bonding (Shimoni-Livny et al., 1998 ▶), or when one or more of the ligands is anionic (Esteban-Gómez et al., 2006 ▶). However, hemidirected lead(II) complexes in a soft sulfur-rich environment are also known (Imran et al., 2014 ▶). The results of a reduced variational space (RVS) analysis suggest that more sterically crowded, hemidirected structures are stabilized by polarization of the lead(II) ion induced by the ligand arrangement (Devereux et al., 2011 ▶). The possibility of a distorted coordination sphere enhancing the volume of void space between chains found in coordination polymers provided the impetus for the synthesis and structural characterization of the compounds reported herein.

Structural commentary

Fig. 1 ▶ shows the three acetate coordination modes displayed by (I), (II), and (III). The three modes will be referred to hereafter as types (a), (b) and (c). As seen in Fig. 2 ▶, the asymmetric unit of (I) has four symmetry-independent Pb atoms. The Pb atoms are linked by bridging acetate ligands of type (b) to form a ladder-chain parallel to [010]. Each is also coordinated to a bidentate acetate ligand of type (a) and Pb2 and Pb4 have an amine nitro­gen in their coordination spheres. Finally, atoms Pb3 and Pb4 are linked by an acetato ligand of type (c). The two benzene-1,2-di­amine ligands are approximately coplanar. The angle formed by the benzene mean planes is 6.1 (4)°, with N1, N2, N3 and N4 being 0.051 (16), 0.013 (19), 0.074 (16), and 0.034 (16) Å from their respective planes.
Figure 1

The three acetate coordination modes observed in (I), (II), and (III), showing (a) acetato-κ2 O,O′, (b) μ3-acetato-κ4 O,O′:O:O′, and (c) μ2-acetato-κ3 O,O′:O.

Figure 2

The atom-labeling scheme for (I). Anisotropic displacement parameters are drawn at the 50% probability level.

The asymmetric unit of (I) possesses pseudo-translational symmetry as a result of the similarity in the coordination geometries exhibited by Pb1 and Pb3 and by Pb2 and Pb4. Pb1⋯Pb3 = 7.4548 (10) Å and Pb2⋯Pb4 = 7.5372 (10) Å, approximately half of the Pb1⋯Pb4i = 14.989 (2) Å distance (see Table 1 ▶ for symmetry codes). Fig. 3 ▶ shows a representation of (I) in which the two pseudo-translationally related halves of the asymmetric unit are color coded. Primary differences in the two halves involve the orientation of the two non-coordinating amine groups, one less acetate type (c) on Pb1 than on Pb3, and a type (c) acetate ligand on Pb2 replaced by a type (a) acetate ligand on Pb4.
Table 1

Selected bond lengths () for (I)

Pb1O22.380(6)Pb3O122.509(7)
Pb1O32.474(7)Pb3O102.590(6)
Pb1O42.576(7)Pb3O92.604(7)
Pb1O12.636(7)Pb3O7ii 2.675(7)
Pb1O52.667(6)Pb3O132.688(6)
Pb1O3i 2.792(7)Pb3O62.696(7)
Pb2O82.448(8)Pb4O162.427(7)
Pb2O62.470(7)Pb4O132.482(7)
Pb2O52.485(6)Pb4O142.563(7)
Pb2O92.654(7)Pb4O14iii 2.609(7)
Pb2O42.696(6)Pb4O152.713(7)
Pb2O72.747(8)Pb4O102.901(6)
Pb2N12.797(9)Pb4N32.862(10)
Pb3O112.443(7)  

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

Figure 3

A view of (I) in which the two halves of the asymmetric unit related by the pseudo-translation are color coded. H atoms have been omitted for clarity.

(II) and (III) are isotypic if the nitrile function in (III) is considered as a large one-atomic group and replaces the Cl atom in (II). Fig. 4 ▶ shows the atom-labeling scheme for (II) and Fig. 5 ▶ shows the atom-labeling scheme for (III). Each Pb atom has two bidentate acetate ligands, one of type (a) and one of type (b). The type (b) ligands result in chains parallel to [100], with Pb2O2 cores related by inversion centers. The substituted benzene-1,2-di­amine ligands are essentially planar. For (II), N1 and N2 are below the plane by 0.056 (14) and 0.066 (18) Å, respectively, and Cl1 is 0.020 (14) Å above the plane. In (III), N1 and N2 are 0.073 (17) and 0.05 (2) Å out of the plane. The C7—N3—C4 angle is 177.7 (16)° and N3 is 0.12 (2) Å out of the plane.
Figure 4

The atom-labeling scheme for (II). Anisotropic displacement parameters are drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry identifiers: (i) −x + 1, −y, −z + 1; (ii) −x + 2, −y, −z + 1.]

Figure 5

The atom-labeling scheme for (III). Anisotropic displacement parameters are drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry identifiers: (i) −x + 1, −y, −z + 1; (ii) −x + 2, −y, −z + 1.]

The coordination spheres are O6, O6N, O7, and O6N for Pb1, Pb2, Pb3, and Pb4, respectively, for (I), and O6N for (II) and (III). Representations of the coordination spheres are shown in Fig. 6 ▶ and pertinent bond distances are found in Tables 1 ▶, 2 ▶ and 3 ▶. The coordination is clearly hemidirected for each Pb and the Pb—O bond lengths are asymmetrical, as is often found for hemidirected compounds (Shimoni-Livny et al., 1998 ▶). The average Pb—O bond lengths are 2.60 (13), 2.59 (11), and 2.58 (12) Å for (I), (II) and (III), respectively, or 2.59 (12) Å overall, and range from 2.380 (6) to 2.901 (6) Å. The average PbN bond length for the three compounds is 2.84 (5) Å. In all cases, the Pb—O(N) bond lengths are longer for those ligand atoms adjacent to the open coordination site. This is consistent with structural results for other hemidirected coordination modes involving O- and N-donor atoms (cf. Shimoni-Livny et al., 1998 ▶; Morsali et al., 2005 ▶; Esteban-Gómez et al., 2006 ▶; Morsali, 2004 ▶).
Figure 6

Representation of the PbII coordination environments observed in (I), (II), and (III). Symmetry identifiers are those used in Tables 1 ▶, 2 ▶ and 3 ▶.

Table 2

Selected bond lengths () for (II)

Pb1O12.467(6)Pb1O22.678(7)
Pb1O32.504(6)Pb1O3ii 2.734(6)
Pb1O42.512(6)Pb1N12.800(8)
Pb1O4i 2.632(6)  

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Table 3

Selected bond lengths () for (III)

Pb1O32.431(7)Pb1O42.667(8)
Pb1O22.485(8)Pb1O1ii 2.727(7)
Pb1O12.505(7)Pb1N12.906(10)
Pb1O2i 2.635(7)  

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Supra­molecular features

The one-dimensional asymmetric unit chain of (I) propagates via inversion centers and is extended into two dimensions via an acetate ligand of type (c) that bridges Pb2 and Pb3iii, as shown in Fig. 7 ▶, where the symmetry designators are defined. The result is an extended structure composed of planes parallel to (10). N—H⋯O and N—H⋯N hydrogen bonding is observed along the chains parallel to [010] (see Table 4 ▶).
Figure 7

Packing diagram for (I), showing the linked chains. Hydrogen bonds are represented by dashed lines. H atoms not involved in the hydrogen-bonding network are not shown. [Symmetry identifiers: (i) −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1; (ii) x + , y + , z + ; (iii) x − , −y + , z − ; (iv) −x + , y + , −z + ; (v) −x + , y + , −z + .]

Table 4

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ) for (I)

DHA DHHA D A DHA
N1H1AO20.89(2)2.20(3)3.061(11)163(7)
N1H1BO110.88(2)2.25(4)3.079(11)156(8)
N2H2AO110.90(2)2.38(5)3.238(13)159(11)
N2H2BN40.90(2)2.57(5)3.229(14)131(5)
N3H3AO120.87(2)2.32(4)3.151(11)160(8)
N3H3BO16iii 0.88(2)2.33(4)3.145(11)154(7)
N4H4BO100.88(2)2.38(4)3.236(12)163(10)

Symmetry code: (iii) .

In compounds (II) and (III), chains parallel to [100] are observed. An extensive N—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding network is found along the chains (see Tables 5 ▶ and 6 ▶). For (III), the nitrile group affords the opportunity for additional hydrogen bonding. As seen in Fig. 8 ▶, this results in (14) rings involving N—H⋯N C hydrogen bonds between adjacent chains.
Table 5

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ) for (II)

DHA DHHA D A DHA
N1H1AO2ii 0.88(2)2.38(3)3.261(11)172(9)
N1H1BO1i 0.88(2)2.39(5)3.201(10)153(8)
N2H2AO1i 0.87(2)2.19(6)2.998(11)155(13)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Table 6

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ) for (III)

DHA DHHA D A DHA
N1H1AO4ii 0.88(2)2.46(4)3.310(14)164(12)
N1H1BO3i 0.87(2)2.40(8)3.139(12)143(11)
N2H2AO3i 0.88(2)2.25(9)3.044(14)150(16)
N2H2BN3iii 0.88(2)2.62(11)3.355(18)142(14)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

Figure 8

Packing diagram for (III), showing the chains joined by N—H⋯N C hydrogen bonds. Hydrogen bonds are represented by by dashed lines. H atoms not involved in the hydrogen-bonding network are not shown. [Symmetry identifiers: (i) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; (ii) −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1; (iii) x + 1, y − 1, z − 1; (iv) −x + 2, −y, −z; (v) x, y − 1, z − 1.]

Based on calculations performed with PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶), no solvent-accessible voids are found in (I), (II), or (III).

Database survey

Numerous examples of polymeric lead(II) compounds with bridging carboxyl­ate ligands possessing a range of coordination modes have been reported (for examples, see Lyczko & Bak, 2008 ▶; Dai et al., 2009 ▶; Mohammadnezhad et al., 2010 ▶; Yilmaz et al., 2003 ▶; Foreman et al., 2001 ▶). A zinc metal organic framework with bridging acetate ligands and a monodentate 4-chloro­benzene-1,2-di­amine ligand has been reported (Geiger & Parsons, 2014 ▶).

Synthesis and crystallization

Preparation of (I)

Benzene-1,2-di­amine (0.109 g, 0.93 mmol) was stirred into a solution of lead(II) acetate trihydrate (0.175 g, 0.46 mmol) in ethanol (10 ml). The solution was heated to a gentle reflux for 2 h and then cooled to room temperature. The solvent was reduced in volume by slow evaporation. After 5 d, crystals suitable for X-ray analysis had formed. Further solvent reduction resulted in precipitation of excess di­amine, so the overall yield was not determined. Selected IR bands (diamond anvil, cm−1): 3353 (br), 1505 (s), 1932 (s), 1284 (s) 1045 (w), 1018 (w), 939 (w).

Preparation of (II)

4-Chloro­benzene-1,2-di­amine (0.106 g, 0.75 mmol) was dissolved in boiling ethanol (10 ml) and lead(II) acetate trihydrate (0.134 g, 0.35 mmol) was added with stirring. The resulting solution was refluxed for 4 h, removed from the heat and the solvent was allowed to slowly evaporate. The residue obtained was dissolved in hot methanol and passed through a 45 µm pore filter. Crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained after slow evaporation of the solvent. Further solvent reduction resulted in precipitation of excess di­amine and so the overall yield was not determined. Selected IR bands (diamond anvil, cm−1): 3334 (br), 1537 (s), 1393 (s), 1337 (s), 1018 (s).

Preparation of (III)

To a solution of lead(II) acetate trihydrate (0.149 g, 0.39 mmol) in ethanol (10 ml) was added 3,4-di­amino­benzo­nitrile (0.104 g, 0.75 mmol). The resulting solution was stirred at a gentle reflux for 1 h. The solvent was allowed to slowly evaporate over a period of 3 d, resulting in crystals suitable for X-ray analysis. Further solvent reduction resulted in precipitation of excess di­amine and so the overall yield was not determined. Selected IR bands (diamond anvil, cm−1): 3432 (w), 3316 (w), 2213 (s), 1581 (s), 1557 (s), 1394 (s), 1301 (s), 1020 (s).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 7 ▶. All H atoms were observed in difference Fourier maps. C-bonded H atoms were refined using a riding model, with C—H = 0.98 Å for the methyl groups and 0.95 Å for the aromatic ring. The C—H hydrogen isotropic displacement parameters were fixed using the approximation U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(C) for the methyl H atoms and 1.2U eq(C) for the aromatic H atoms. The atomic coordinates for the amine H atoms were refined using an N—H bond-distance restraint of 0.88 (2) Å and the H-atom isotropic displacement parameters were set using the approximation U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(N). Late in the refinement, a correction for extinction was applied for each of the structures. For (I), the highest residual electron-density peak is 0.94 Å from Pb2 and the deepest hole is 1.20 Å from Pb3. The highest residual electron-density peak is 0.89 Å and the deepest hole is 0.91 Å from Pb1 in (II). For (III), the highest residual electron-density peak and the deepest hole are 0.92 Å and 0.82 Å, respectively, from Pb1.
Table 7

Experimental details

 (I)(II)(III)
Crystal data
Chemical formula[Pb4(C2H3O2)8(C6H8N2)2][Pb(C2H3O2)2(C6H7ClN2)][Pb(C2H3O2)2(C7H7N3)]
M r 1517.40467.86458.43
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n Triclinic, P Triclinic, P
Temperature (K)200200200
a, b, c ()11.1447(14), 29.694(4), 11.8597(14)7.3623(10), 7.6177(10), 13.1413(17)7.3724(8), 7.6349(8), 13.4069(15)
, , ()90, 103.941(4), 9089.762(4), 76.405(4), 66.691(4)88.839(3), 78.330(3), 66.035(3)
V (3)3809.1(8)654.63(15)673.71(13)
Z 422
Radiation typeMo K Mo K Mo K
(mm1)17.7013.1012.54
Crystal size (mm)0.50 0.30 0.100.30 0.10 0.100.30 0.20 0.05
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART X2S benchtopBruker SMART X2S benchtopBruker SMART X2S benchtop
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2013)Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2013)Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2013)
T min, T max 0.12, 0.270.11, 0.350.12, 0.57
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections26670, 7708, 52396572, 2572, 22628223, 2819, 2498
R int 0.0800.0570.053
(sin /)max (1)0.6240.6250.641
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.042, 0.093, 0.960.038, 0.100, 1.040.041, 0.145, 1.14
No. of reflections770825722819
No. of parameters502178187
No. of restraints122696
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinementH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinementH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
max, min (e 3)2.12, 1.973.38, 3.083.41, 2.68

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2013 ▶), SHELXS97 and SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶), PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▶), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▶) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I, II, III. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814025380/zl2608sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814025380/zl2608Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814025380/zl2608Isup5.mol Structure factors: contains datablock(s) II. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814025380/zl2608IIsup3.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814025380/zl2608IIsup6.mol Structure factors: contains datablock(s) III. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814025380/zl2608IIIsup4.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814025380/zl2608IIIsup7.mol CCDC references: 1035089, 1035088, 1035087 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Pb(C2H3O2)2(C7H7N3)]Z = 2
Mr = 458.43F(000) = 428
Triclinic, P1Dx = 2.260 Mg m3
a = 7.3724 (8) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 7.6349 (8) ÅCell parameters from 117 reflections
c = 13.4069 (15) Åθ = 3.4–27.1°
α = 88.839 (3)°µ = 12.54 mm1
β = 78.330 (3)°T = 200 K
γ = 66.035 (3)°Plate, clear colourless
V = 673.71 (13) Å30.30 × 0.20 × 0.05 mm
Bruker SMART X2S benchtop diffractometer2819 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed microfocus tube2498 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Doubly curved silicon crystal monochromatorRint = 0.053
ω scansθmax = 27.1°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2013)h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.12, Tmax = 0.57k = −9→9
8223 measured reflectionsl = −17→17
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.145w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0965P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.14(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2819 reflectionsΔρmax = 3.41 e Å3
187 parametersΔρmin = −2.68 e Å3
96 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2008)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0029 (14)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Pb10.67380 (5)0.66477 (5)0.53022 (2)0.0203 (2)
N10.7227 (14)0.4007 (13)0.6920 (7)0.0275 (19)
H1A0.670 (16)0.320 (12)0.682 (11)0.041*
H1B0.845 (8)0.333 (14)0.702 (10)0.041*
N20.8921 (17)0.592 (2)0.8005 (10)0.059 (4)
H2A0.97 (2)0.54 (2)0.742 (7)0.088*
H2B0.94 (2)0.67 (2)0.823 (12)0.088*
C10.6114 (17)0.5081 (16)0.7846 (8)0.027 (2)
C20.6936 (17)0.6094 (15)0.8374 (8)0.028 (2)
C30.5729 (17)0.7188 (17)0.9252 (9)0.036 (3)
H30.62840.78020.96350.043*
C40.3739 (18)0.7430 (18)0.9601 (9)0.035 (2)
C50.2911 (18)0.6475 (18)0.9083 (9)0.038 (3)
H50.1560.65960.93290.046*
C60.4078 (17)0.5367 (16)0.8218 (9)0.032 (2)
H60.34960.4760.78480.038*
C70.251 (2)0.870 (2)1.0495 (9)0.044 (3)
N30.1570 (19)0.9743 (18)1.1197 (10)0.057 (3)
O10.6745 (10)0.3933 (10)0.4281 (6)0.0253 (15)
O20.9632 (11)0.3531 (12)0.4658 (6)0.0303 (17)
C80.8580 (15)0.2890 (15)0.4258 (8)0.0216 (19)
C90.9546 (18)0.0876 (19)0.3768 (11)0.041 (3)
H9A1.10090.04960.35290.062*
H9B0.89420.08260.31880.062*
H9C0.9315−0.00050.42690.062*
O30.8051 (11)0.7257 (11)0.3578 (6)0.0280 (16)
O40.4720 (12)0.8727 (14)0.3943 (7)0.042 (2)
C100.6369 (18)0.8350 (18)0.3345 (9)0.032 (2)
C110.642 (2)0.916 (2)0.2316 (10)0.047 (3)
H11A0.65771.03670.23530.07*
H11B0.51440.93980.21040.07*
H11C0.7560.82380.18180.07*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Pb10.0163 (3)0.0203 (3)0.0214 (3)−0.00385 (19)−0.00553 (16)−0.00232 (16)
N10.028 (4)0.015 (4)0.030 (4)−0.001 (4)−0.002 (3)−0.004 (3)
N20.040 (5)0.073 (9)0.057 (7)−0.024 (5)0.005 (5)−0.034 (6)
C10.030 (4)0.021 (5)0.022 (4)−0.003 (4)−0.004 (3)0.001 (3)
C20.032 (4)0.020 (5)0.027 (4)−0.002 (4)−0.012 (3)0.004 (3)
C30.036 (5)0.033 (6)0.033 (5)−0.006 (4)−0.009 (4)−0.004 (4)
C40.034 (5)0.029 (6)0.028 (5)−0.001 (4)−0.006 (4)0.001 (4)
C50.033 (5)0.041 (6)0.029 (5)−0.006 (5)−0.001 (4)−0.003 (4)
C60.033 (4)0.023 (5)0.032 (5)−0.007 (4)−0.001 (3)−0.003 (4)
C70.044 (7)0.051 (9)0.029 (6)−0.013 (7)−0.002 (5)−0.011 (6)
N30.062 (8)0.050 (8)0.047 (7)−0.014 (7)−0.002 (6)−0.016 (6)
O10.017 (3)0.013 (3)0.042 (4)0.000 (3)−0.013 (3)0.002 (3)
O20.017 (3)0.034 (5)0.036 (4)−0.006 (3)−0.006 (3)−0.011 (3)
C80.021 (4)0.020 (4)0.022 (4)−0.006 (3)−0.007 (3)0.005 (3)
C90.027 (5)0.028 (5)0.063 (8)−0.002 (4)−0.014 (5)−0.019 (5)
O30.023 (3)0.028 (4)0.031 (4)−0.008 (3)−0.007 (3)0.002 (3)
O40.023 (3)0.048 (6)0.043 (4)−0.001 (4)−0.012 (3)0.011 (4)
C100.029 (4)0.036 (6)0.033 (5)−0.014 (4)−0.012 (3)−0.004 (4)
C110.060 (8)0.042 (8)0.043 (5)−0.021 (6)−0.022 (5)0.011 (5)
Pb1—O32.431 (7)C4—C71.449 (17)
Pb1—O22.485 (8)C5—C61.358 (15)
Pb1—O12.505 (7)C5—H50.95
Pb1—O2i2.635 (7)C6—H60.95
Pb1—O42.667 (8)C7—N31.146 (16)
Pb1—O1ii2.727 (7)O1—C81.255 (12)
Pb1—N12.906 (10)O1—Pb1ii2.727 (7)
N1—C11.403 (13)O2—C81.271 (12)
N1—H1A0.88 (2)O2—Pb1i2.635 (7)
N1—H1B0.87 (2)C8—C91.505 (15)
N2—C21.398 (15)C9—H9A0.98
N2—H2A0.88 (2)C9—H9B0.98
N2—H2B0.88 (2)C9—H9C0.98
C1—C61.409 (15)O3—C101.279 (13)
C1—C21.430 (15)O4—C101.239 (14)
C2—C31.373 (15)C10—C111.500 (18)
C3—C41.382 (17)C11—H11A0.98
C3—H30.95C11—H11B0.98
C4—C51.393 (17)C11—H11C0.98
O3—Pb1—O277.0 (3)C4—C3—H3118.7
O3—Pb1—O178.6 (3)C3—C4—C5120.0 (11)
O2—Pb1—O152.0 (2)C3—C4—C7119.9 (12)
O3—Pb1—O2i75.3 (2)C5—C4—C7120.0 (11)
O2—Pb1—O2i64.3 (3)C6—C5—C4118.5 (11)
O1—Pb1—O2i114.8 (2)C6—C5—H5120.7
O3—Pb1—O450.8 (2)C4—C5—H5120.7
O2—Pb1—O4117.2 (3)C5—C6—C1122.9 (11)
O1—Pb1—O482.3 (3)C5—C6—H6118.6
O2i—Pb1—O4119.7 (3)C1—C6—H6118.6
O3—Pb1—O1ii119.9 (2)N3—C7—C4177.7 (16)
O2—Pb1—O1ii108.4 (2)C8—O1—Pb193.8 (6)
O1—Pb1—O1ii63.9 (3)C8—O1—Pb1ii134.3 (6)
O2i—Pb1—O1ii162.4 (3)Pb1—O1—Pb1ii116.1 (3)
O4—Pb1—O1ii77.9 (3)C8—O2—Pb194.3 (6)
O3—Pb1—N1147.4 (2)C8—O2—Pb1i147.4 (7)
O2—Pb1—N170.6 (3)Pb1—O2—Pb1i115.7 (3)
O1—Pb1—N183.9 (3)O1—C8—O2119.8 (9)
O2i—Pb1—N187.6 (3)O1—C8—C9120.6 (9)
O4—Pb1—N1152.5 (3)O2—C8—C9119.6 (9)
O1ii—Pb1—N174.7 (2)C8—C9—H9A109.5
C1—N1—Pb1107.9 (6)C8—C9—H9B109.5
C1—N1—H1A108 (9)H9A—C9—H9B109.5
Pb1—N1—H1A109 (9)C8—C9—H9C109.5
C1—N1—H1B106 (9)H9A—C9—H9C109.5
Pb1—N1—H1B119 (9)H9B—C9—H9C109.5
H1A—N1—H1B107 (5)C10—O3—Pb198.9 (7)
C2—N2—H2A128 (10)C10—O4—Pb188.8 (7)
C2—N2—H2B123 (10)O4—C10—O3121.5 (11)
H2A—N2—H2B106 (5)O4—C10—C11119.8 (11)
N1—C1—C6120.8 (10)O3—C10—C11118.6 (11)
N1—C1—C2120.7 (10)C10—C11—H11A109.5
C6—C1—C2118.1 (10)C10—C11—H11B109.5
C3—C2—N2122.3 (11)H11A—C11—H11B109.5
C3—C2—C1117.7 (10)C10—C11—H11C109.5
N2—C2—C1120.0 (10)H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C2—C3—C4122.7 (11)H11B—C11—H11C109.5
C2—C3—H3118.7
Pb1—N1—C1—C691.4 (11)C2—C1—C6—C5−3.7 (18)
Pb1—N1—C1—C2−81.2 (10)Pb1—O1—C8—O2−3.0 (10)
N1—C1—C2—C3177.1 (10)Pb1ii—O1—C8—O2−135.8 (8)
C6—C1—C2—C34.2 (16)Pb1—O1—C8—C9176.5 (10)
N1—C1—C2—N2−4.3 (17)Pb1ii—O1—C8—C943.6 (15)
C6—C1—C2—N2−177.1 (12)Pb1—O2—C8—O13.0 (10)
N2—C2—C3—C4177.4 (13)Pb1i—O2—C8—O1−154.9 (9)
C1—C2—C3—C4−4.0 (18)Pb1—O2—C8—C9−176.4 (10)
C2—C3—C4—C53.0 (19)Pb1i—O2—C8—C926 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C7−175.9 (12)Pb1—O4—C10—O32.1 (11)
C3—C4—C5—C6−2.2 (19)Pb1—O4—C10—C11−178.9 (11)
C7—C4—C5—C6176.7 (12)Pb1—O3—C10—O4−2.3 (13)
C4—C5—C6—C12.7 (19)Pb1—O3—C10—C11178.7 (10)
N1—C1—C6—C5−176.6 (11)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O4ii0.88 (2)2.46 (4)3.310 (14)164 (12)
N1—H1B···O3i0.87 (2)2.40 (8)3.139 (12)143 (11)
N2—H2A···O3i0.88 (2)2.25 (9)3.044 (14)150 (16)
N2—H2B···N3iii0.88 (2)2.62 (11)3.355 (18)142 (14)
  13 in total

Review 1.  Metal-organic framework materials as chemical sensors.

Authors:  Lauren E Kreno; Kirsty Leong; Omar K Farha; Mark Allendorf; Richard P Van Duyne; Joseph T Hupp
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Rational design, synthesis, purification, and activation of metal-organic framework materials.

Authors:  Omar K Farha; Joseph T Hupp
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  Influence of polyhedron distortions on calculated bond-valence sums for cations with one lone electron pair.

Authors:  X Wang; F Liebau
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2007-03-16

4.  Lone-pair activity in lead(II) complexes with unsymmetrical lariat ethers.

Authors:  David Esteban-Gómez; Carlos Platas-Iglesias; Teresa Enríquez-Pérez; Fernando Avecilla; Andrés de Blas; Teresa Rodríguez-Blas
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  Crystalline metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): synthesis, structure and function.

Authors:  Chandan Dey; Tanay Kundu; Bishnu P Biswal; Arijit Mallick; Rahul Banerjee
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-12-10

6.  catena-Poly[[aqua-(3-methyl-benzoato-κO,O')lead(II)]-μ-3-methyl-benzoato-κO:O,O':O'].

Authors:  Jun Dai; Juan Yang; Xiaobing An
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-06-06

7.  Role of Cation Polarization in holo- and hemi-Directed [Pb(H2O)n](2+) Complexes and Development of a Pb(2+) Polarizable Force Field.

Authors:  Mike Devereux; Marie-Céline van Severen; Olivier Parisel; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Nohad Gresh
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Bis(μ-quinoline-2-carboxyl-ato)-κN,O:O;κO:N,O-bis-[(acetato-κO,O')(methanol-κO)lead(II)].

Authors:  Gholamhossein Mohammadnezhad; Ali Reza Ghanbarpour; Mostafa M Amini; Seik Weng Ng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-07-17

9.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

10.  Poly[[tris-(μ2-acetato-κ(2) O:O')(4-chloro-benzene-1,2-di-amine-κN)(μ3-hydroxido)dizinc] ethanol monosolvate].

Authors:  David K Geiger; Dylan E Parsons
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-06-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Two cadmium coordination polymers with bridging acetate and phenyl-enedi-amine ligands that exhibit two-dimensional layered structures.

Authors:  David K Geiger; Dylan E Parsons; Bracco A Pagano
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2016-11-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.