Literature DB >> 25552364

Prognostic and predictive investigation of PAM50 intrinsic subtypes in the NCIC CTG MA.21 phase III chemotherapy trial.

Shuzhen Liu1, Judy-Anne W Chapman, Margot J Burnell, Mark N Levine, Kathleen I Pritchard, Timothy J Whelan, Hope S Rugo, Kathy S Albain, Edith A Perez, Shakeel Virk, Garrett Barry, Dongxia Gao, Patti O'Brien, Lois E Shepherd, Torsten O Nielsen, Karen A Gelmon.   

Abstract

PAM50-defined breast cancer intrinsic subtypes and risk-of-relapse (ROR) scores are prognostic and predictive of endocrine therapy and some chemotherapy. We investigated the prognostic and predictive effect of PAM50 classifications by chemotherapy type. NCIC CTG MA.21 randomized 2,104 patients to doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel (AC/T); dose-intense cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and flurouracil (CEF); or dose-dense, dose-intense epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel (EC/T). Patients were ≤60 years, with node-positive or high-risk node-negative disease, with median 8-year follow-up. Intrinsic subtypes and ROR were determined from RNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections by the NanoString PAM50 test. Univariate effects on relapse-free survival (RFS) were assessed with stratified log-rank test; multivariate analyses utilized stratified Cox regression. Among 1094 cases completing PAM50 intrinsic subtyping, 27 % were classified as luminal A, 23 % luminal B, 18 % HER2E, and 32 % basal-like. CEF and EC/T were superior to AC/T (p = 0.01). Higher continuous ROR was multivariately associated with worse RFS (p = 0.03), although categorical ROR was neither prognostic nor predictive. Intrinsic subtypes had a significant multivariate prognostic effect on RFS (p = 0.002). Compared with luminal A, hazard ratios were luminal B = 1.48 (95 % CI 0.92-2.37); HER2E = 2.68 (95 % CI 1.60-4.48); and basal-like = 1.97 (95 % CI 1.10-3.53). Intrinsic subtypes were not predictive of treatment benefit (AC/T vs. EC/T + CEF); however, subgroup analysis indicated subtypes (non-luminal vs. luminal) was predictive of taxane benefit (EC/T vs. CEF; p = 0.05). Both NanoString PAM50 subtypes and continuous ROR had significant prognostic effects on RFS for breast cancer patients treated with CEF, EC/T, and AC/T. Non-luminal tumors differentially responded to EC/T (with taxane) over CEF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25552364     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3259-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  11 in total

1.  Clinical utility of multigene profiling assays in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  M C Chang; L H Souter; S Kamel-Reid; M Rutherford; P Bedard; M Trudeau; J Hart; A Eisen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Luminal A Breast Cancer and Molecular Assays: A Review.

Authors:  Jennifer J Gao; Sandra M Swain
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-02-22

3.  NanoString expression profiling identifies candidate biomarkers of RAD001 response in metastatic gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kakoli Das; Xiu Bin Chan; David Epstein; Bin Tean Teh; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Seung Tae Kim; Se Hoon Park; Won Ki Kang; Steve Rozen; Jeeyun Lee; Patrick Tan
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-02-17

Review 4.  Hormonal Modulation of Breast Cancer Gene Expression: Implications for Intrinsic Subtyping in Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Sarah M Bernhardt; Pallave Dasari; David Walsh; Amanda R Townsend; Timothy J Price; Wendy V Ingman
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Selecting postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy for early stage breast cancer: A critical assessment of commercially available gene expression assays.

Authors:  David M Hyams; Eric Schuur; Javier Angel Aristizabal; Juan Enrique Bargallo Rocha; Cesar Cabello; Roberto Elizalde; Laura García-Estévez; Henry L Gomez; Artur Katz; Aníbal Nuñez De Pierro
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

7.  Biological subtyping of early breast cancer: a study comparing RT-qPCR with immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Ralph M Wirtz; Harri Sihto; Jorma Isola; Päivi Heikkilä; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Päivi Auvinen; Taina Turpeenniemi-Hujanen; Sirkku Jyrkkiö; Sotiris Lakis; Kornelia Schlombs; Mark Laible; Stefan Weber; Sebastian Eidt; Ugur Sahin; Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Study design requirements for RNA sequencing-based breast cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Arvind Singh Mer; Daniel Klevebring; Henrik Grönberg; Mattias Rantalainen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The 21-gene Recurrence Score® assay predicts distant recurrence in lymph node-positive, hormone receptor-positive, breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant sequential epirubicin- and docetaxel-based or epirubicin-based chemotherapy (PACS-01 trial).

Authors:  Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Thomas Filleron; Bernard Asselain; Frederick L Baehner; Pierre Fumoleau; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Joseph M Anderson; Carl Yoshizawa; Diana B Cherbavaz; Steven Shak; Lise Roca; Christine Sagan; Jérôme Lemonnier; Anne-Laure Martin; Henri Roché
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  The Role of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score® Assay in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The Canadian Experience.

Authors:  Mariya Yordanova; Saima Hassan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.