Literature DB >> 25552127

Modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization an alternative in vitro fertilization treatment with lower costs per achieved pregnancy but longer treatment time.

Michael von Wolff1, Susanne Rohner, Alessandro Santi, Petra Stute, Roxana Popovici, Benedicte Weiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost and time requirement per achieved pregnancy in optimized modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization (mNC-IVF) based on a treatment protocol with very few consultations and to compare those with conventional gonadotropin-stimulated aVF (clVF) cycles. STUDY
DESIGN: Mono centric prospective trial. Eighty infertile patients each received 1 modified mNC-IVF cycle using low doses of the clomiphene citrate. Based on the number of consultations and the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle, the total costs and required time to achieve a pregnancy were analyzed and compared with cIVF. Calculations for cIVF were based on standard therapy protocols and outcomes of European registries.
RESULTS: Patients (21-42 years old, 35.4 +/- 4.7 years) undergoing mNC-IVF required on average 1.2 consultations before follicle aspiration. Pregnancy rate per transfer and per initiated cycle were 25% and 13.6%, respectively. Multiple pregnancies did not occur. According to the calculations, total costs per pregnancy rate were around 15% lower with mNC-IVF as compared to cIVF. In contrast, time to achieve an equal pregnancy rate was calculated to take around 30% longer with mNC-IVF as compared to cIVF.
CONCLUSION: mNC-IVF using very low dosages of clomiphene citrate avoids multiple pregnancies and is less expensive but more time consuming per achieved pregnancy when compared to clVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25552127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  5 in total

1.  The Ideal Stimulation Protocol: Is There One?

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-07-01

2.  Reproductive outcomes of vitrified blastocyst transfer in modified natural cycle versus mild hormonally stimulated and artificial protocols: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Otoufe Sheikhi; Masoumeh Golsorkhtabaramiri; Sedighe Esmaeilzadeh; Treza Mahouti; Fateme Nadi Heidari
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01

Review 3.  Poor ovarian response and the possible role of natural and modified natural cycles.

Authors:  Federica Di Guardo; Christophe Blockeel; Michel De Vos; Marco Palumbo; Nikolaos Christoforidis; Herman Tournaye; Panagiotis Drakopoulos
Journal:  Ther Adv Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-14

4.  Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-Cycle In Vitro Fertilization Using 57,558 Linked Cycle Records: A Machine Learning Perspective.

Authors:  Yanran Zhang; Lei Shen; Xinghui Yin; Wenfeng Chen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.055

5.  Impact of embryo quality and endometrial thickness on implantation in natural cycle IVF.

Authors:  Vlatka Tomic; Miro Kasum; Katarina Vucic
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.344

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.