Literature DB >> 25551659

eCounterscreening: using QSAR predictions to prioritize testing for off-target activities and setting the balance between benefit and risk.

Robert P Sheridan1, Daniel R McMasters, Johannes H Voigt, Mary Jo Wildey.   

Abstract

During drug development, compounds are tested against counterscreens, a panel of off-target activities that would be undesirable for a drug to have. Testing every compound against every counterscreen is generally too costly in terms of time and money, and we need to find a rational way of prioritizing counterscreen testing. Here we present the eCounterscreening paradigm, wherein predictions from QSAR models for counterscreen activity are used to generate a recommendation as to whether a specific compound in a specific project should be tested against a specific counterscreen. The rules behind the recommendations, which can be summarized in a risk-benefit plot specific for a counterscreen/project combination, are based on a previously assembled database of prospective QSAR predictions. The recommendations require two user-defined cutoffs: the level of activity in a specific counterscreen that is considered undesirable and the level of risk the chemist is willing to accept that an undesired counterscreen activity will go undetected. We demonstrate in a simulated prospective experiment that eCounterscreening can be used to postpone a large fraction of counterscreen testing and still have an acceptably low risk of undetected counterscreen activity.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25551659     DOI: 10.1021/ci500666m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  4 in total

1.  Data to Decisions: Creating a Culture of Model-Driven Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Frank K Brown; Farida Kopti; Charlie Zhenyu Chang; Scott A Johnson; Meir Glick; Chris L Waller
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  The evolution of drug design at Merck Research Laboratories.

Authors:  Frank K Brown; Edward C Sherer; Scott A Johnson; M Katharine Holloway; Bradley S Sherborne
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Improving the prediction of organism-level toxicity through integration of chemical, protein target and cytotoxicity qHTS data.

Authors:  Chad H G Allen; Alexios Koutsoukas; Isidro Cortés-Ciriano; Daniel S Murrell; Thérèse E Malliavin; Robert C Glen; Andreas Bender
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  Simplified, interpretable graph convolutional neural networks for small molecule activity prediction.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Weber; Joseph A Morrone; Sugato Bagchi; Jan D Estrada Pabon; Seung-Gu Kang; Leili Zhang; Wendy D Cornell
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.179

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.