Literature DB >> 25551501

Application of an informatics-based decision-making framework and process to the assessment of radiation safety in nanotechnology.

Mark D Hoover1, David S Myers, Leigh J Cash, Raymond A Guilmette, Wolfgang G Kreyling, Günter Oberdörster, Rachel Smith, James R Cassata, Bruce B Boecker, Michael P Grissom.   

Abstract

The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) established NCRP Scientific Committee 2-6 to develop a report on the current state of knowledge and guidance for radiation safety programs involved with nanotechnology. Nanotechnology is the understanding and control of matter at the nanoscale, at dimensions between ∼1 and 100 nm, where unique phenomena enable novel applications. While the full report is in preparation, this paper presents and applies an informatics-based decision-making framework and process through which the radiation protection community can anticipate that nano-enabled applications, processes, nanomaterials, and nanoparticles are likely to become present or are already present in radiation-related activities; recognize specific situations where environmental and worker safety, health, well-being, and productivity may be affected by nano-related activities; evaluate how radiation protection practices may need to be altered to improve protection; control information, interpretations, assumptions, and conclusions to implement scientifically sound decisions and actions; and confirm that desired protection outcomes have been achieved. This generally applicable framework and supporting process can be continuously applied to achieve health and safety at the convergence of nanotechnology and radiation-related activities.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25551501     DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  5 in total

1.  Toward the Responsible Development and Commercialization of Sensor Nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Tarek R Fadel; Dorothy F Farrell; Lisa E Friedersdorf; Mark H Griep; Mark D Hoover; Michael A Meador; M Meyyappan
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 7.711

2.  Bridging the gap between exposure assessment and inhalation toxicology: Some insights from the carbon nanotube experience.

Authors:  Aaron Erdely; Matthew M Dahm; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Bean T Chen; James M Antonini; Mark D Hoover
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.433

3.  The Nanomaterial Data Curation Initiative: A collaborative approach to assessing, evaluating, and advancing the state of the field.

Authors:  Christine Ogilvie Hendren; Christina M Powers; Mark D Hoover; Stacey L Harper
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Interpreting Mobile and Handheld Air Sensor Readings in Relation to Air Quality Standards and Health Effect Reference Values: Tackling the Challenges.

Authors:  George M Woodall; Mark D Hoover; Ronald Williams; Kristen Benedict; Martin Harper; Jhy-Charm Soo; Annie M Jarabek; Michael J Stewart; James S Brown; Janis E Hulla; Motria Caudill; Andrea L Clements; Amanda Kaufman; Alison J Parker; Martha Keating; David Balshaw; Kevin Garrahan; Laureen Burton; Sheila Batka; Vijay S Limaye; Pertti J Hakkinen; Bob Thompson
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Integration among databases and data sets to support productive nanotechnology: Challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Sandra Karcher; Egon L Willighagen; John Rumble; Friederike Ehrhart; Chris T Evelo; Martin Fritts; Sharon Gaheen; Stacey L Harper; Mark D Hoover; Nina Jeliazkova; Nastassja Lewinski; Richard L Marchese Robinson; Karmann C Mills; Axel P Mustad; Dennis G Thomas; Georgia Tsiliki; Christine Ogilvie Hendren
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2018-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.