Literature DB >> 25550103

Recurrence of rib prominence following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with pedicle screws and direct vertebral body derotation.

Amer F Samdani1, Jahangir Asghar, Firoz Miyanji, James T Bennett, Jane S Hoashi, Baron S Lonner, Michelle C Marks, Peter O Newton, Randal R Betz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pedicle screw constructs combined with direct vertebral body derotation (DVBD) provide a powerful corrective force of the rib prominence associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We wished to evaluate the incidence and correlative factors associated with recurrence of rib prominence (RRP) developing postoperatively despite adequate initial correction.
METHODS: 103 patients with AIS underwent pedicle screw fixation with DVBD without thoracoplasty and had postoperative scoliometer readings at 6, 12, and 24 months. Patients with RRP, defined as a postoperative scoliometer increase ≥5°, were compared to those without recurrence.
RESULTS: The mean rib prominence measured 14.0 ± 4.3° preoperatively, with a correction of 50.3 ± 26.7 % at 6 months, 49.0 ± 39.0 % at 1 year, and 49.1 ± 26.7 % at 2 years. RRP was identified in 15.5 % of the patients with a correction of 57.5 ± 25.5 % at 6 months, 47.2 ± 42.5 % at 1 year, and 40.4 ± 21.6 % at 2 years. At 2 years, the RRP group demonstrated a significantly larger major coronal Cobb (p < 0.05) and a trend towards less curve correction (p = 0.09). Patients with open triradiates had a significantly higher rate of RRP compared to those with closed (p = 0.01). Worsening apical vertebral rotation at 2 years post-operation occurred in 43.8 % (7/16) of the patients with RRP.
CONCLUSION: RRP after posterior fusion for AIS with all pedicle screw constructs and DVBD occurred in 15.5 % of patients in our study. Patients with open triradiate cartilage had a significantly higher rate of RRP, although most with RRP were skeletally mature. There was a trend towards loss of coronal correction and increased apical vertebral rotation at 2 years in patients with RRP. The potential for RRP after adequate initial correction should be discussed with patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25550103     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3716-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

1.  Pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis relative to the surgical procedure: a 10-year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Yevgeniy Gitelman; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Joshua D Auerbach; Brenda A Sides
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test.

Authors:  P Côté; B G Kreitz; J D Cassidy; A K Dzus; J Martel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis relative to the surgical procedure.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Kyoungnam L Kim; Karen Steger-May
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Impact of direct vertebral body derotation on rib prominence: are preoperative factors predictive of changes in rib prominence?

Authors:  Steven W Hwang; Amer F Samdani; Baron Lonner; Feroz Miyanji; Paul Stanton; Michelle C Marks; Tracey Bastrom; Peter O Newton; Randal R Betz; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Internal thoracoplasty. A new procedure.

Authors:  H L Shufflebarger; K Smiley; H J Roth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  James O Sanders; John J Harrast; Timothy R Kuklo; David W Polly; Keith H Bridwell; Mohammad Diab; John P Dormans; Denis S Drummond; John B Emans; Charles E Johnston; Lawrence G Lenke; Richard E McCarthy; Peter O Newton; B Stephens Richards; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Thoracoplasty for the treatment of rib prominence in thoracic scoliosis.

Authors:  A E Geissele; J W Ogilvie; M Cohen; D S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Apical vertebral derotation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: myth or reality?

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Francesco Lolli; Georgios Bakaloudis; Elena Maredi; Francesco Vommaro; Francesca Pastorelli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Computed tomography evaluation of rotation correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of an all pedicle screw construct versus a hook-rod system.

Authors:  Jahangir Asghar; Amer F Samdani; Joshua M Pahys; Linda P D'andrea; James T Guille; David H Clements; Randal R Betz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The crankshaft phenomenon.

Authors:  J Dubousset; J A Herring; H Shufflebarger
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  2 in total

1.  Is vertebral rotation correction maintained after thoracoscopic anterior scoliosis surgery? A low-dose computed tomography study.

Authors:  Luke A Reynolds; Maree T Izatt; Eric M Huang; Robert D Labrom; Geoffrey N Askin; Clayton J Adam; Mark J Pearcy
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-08-17

2.  Correction manoeuvres in the surgical treatment of spinal deformities.

Authors:  Alpaslan Senkoylu; Mehmet Cetinkaya
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-05-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.