Literature DB >> 25549986

Absent bystanders and cognitive dissonance: a comment on Timmins & de Vries.

John Paley1.   

Abstract

Timmins & de Vries are more sympathetic to my editorial than other critics, but they take issue with the details. They doubt whether the bystander phenomenon applies to Mid Staffs nurses; they believe that cognitive dissonance is a better explanation of why nurses fail to behave compassionately; and they think that I am 'perhaps a bit rash' to conclude that 'teaching compassion may be fruitless'. In this comment, I discuss all three points. I suggest that the bystander phenomenon is irrelevant; that Timmins & de Vries give an incomplete account of cognitive dissonance; and that it isn't rash to propose that educating nurses 'for compassion' is a red herring. Additionally, I comment on the idea that I wish to mount a 'defence of healthcare staff'.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bystander apathy; Clinically preventable deaths; Cognitive dissonance; Compassion; Francis; Social psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25549986     DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  1 in total

1.  Just participation or just participation? A participatory justice model for more successful theory of change design, implementation, and solution uptake.

Authors:  Julia Bello-Bravo; John William Medendorp; Barry Pittendrigh
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.