Literature DB >> 25549881

Differential diagnosis between early repolarization of athlete's heart and coved-type Brugada electrocardiogram.

Alessandro Zorzi1, Loira Leoni1, Fernando M Di Paolo2, Ilaria Rigato1, Federico Migliore1, Barbara Bauce1, Antonio Pelliccia2, Domenico Corrado3.   

Abstract

Early repolarization (ER) is typically observed in highly trained athletes as a physiologic consequence of increased vagal tone. The variant of anterior (V1 to V3) ER characterized by "domed" ST-segment elevation and negative T wave raises problems of differential diagnosis with the "coved-type" electrocardiographic pattern seen in Brugada syndrome (BS). This study was designed to identify electrocardiographic criteria for distinguishing athlete's ER from BS. The study compared the electrocardiographic tracings of 61 healthy athletes (80% men, median age 23 ± 8 years), showing "domed" ST-segment elevation and negative T wave in leads V1 to V3, with those of 92 consecutive age- and sex-matched BS patients with a "coved-type" electrocardiographic pattern. The electrocardiographic analysis focused on the ST-segment elevation at J point (STJ) and at 80 milliseconds after J point (ST₈₀). Athletes had a lower maximum amplitude of STJ (1.46 ± 0.7 vs 3.25 ± 0.6 mm, p <0.001) and lower STJ/ST₈₀ (0.8 ± 0.3 vs 1.6 ± 0.3, p <0.001). All patients (100%) with BS showed a downsloping ST-segment configuration (STJ/ST₈₀ >1) versus only 2 (3%) athletes (p <0.001). An upsloping ST-segment configuration (STJ/ST₈₀ <1) showed a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 100%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 98.7% for the diagnosis of ER. At multivariate analysis, STJ/ST₈₀ ratio remained the only independent predictor for ER (odds ratio 87, 95% confidence interval 19 to 357, p <0.001). In conclusion, the STJ/ST₈₀ ratio is a highly accurate electrocardiographic parameter for differential diagnosis between anterior ER of the athlete and BS. Our results may help in reducing the number of athletes who undergo expensive diagnostic workup or are unnecessarily disqualified from competition for changes that fall within the normal range of athlete's heart.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25549881     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.11.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Abnormal ECG Findings in Athletes: Clinical Evaluation and Considerations.

Authors:  Mark Abela; Sanjay Sharma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-12-21

2.  Different habitus but similar electrocardiogram: Cardiac repolarization parameters in children - Comparison of elite athletes to obese children.

Authors:  Christian Paech; Janina Moser; Ingo Dähnert; Franziska Wagner; Roman Antonin Gebauer; Toralf Kirsten; Mandy Vogel; Wieland Kiess; Antje Körner; Bernd Wolfarth; Jan Wüstenfeld
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019 Sep-Dec

Review 3.  Electrocardiographic Predictors of Cardiovascular Mortality.

Authors:  Ioana Mozos; Alexandru Caraba
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.434

4.  A novel mutation in the SCN5A gene contributes to arrhythmogenic characteristics of early repolarization syndrome.

Authors:  Qi Guo; Lan Ren; Xuhua Chen; Cuihong Hou; Jianmin Chu; Jielin Pu; Shu Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 4.101

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.