Literature DB >> 25549164

Stimulus and transducer effects on threshold.

Gregory A Flamme1, Kyle Geda, Kara D McGregor, Krista Wyllys, Kristy K Deiters, William J Murphy, Mark R Stephenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined differences in thresholds obtained under Sennheiser HDA200 circumaural earphones using pure tone, equivalent rectangular noise bands, and 1/3 octave noise bands relative to thresholds obtained using Telephonics TDH-39P supra-aural earphones.
DESIGN: Thresholds were obtained via each transducer and stimulus condition six times within a 10-day period. STUDY SAMPLE: Forty-nine adults were selected from a prior study to represent low, moderate, and high threshold reliability.
RESULTS: The results suggested that (1) only small adjustments were needed to reach equivalent TDH-39P thresholds, (2) pure-tone thresholds obtained with HDA200 circumaural earphones had reliability equal to or better than those obtained using TDH-39P earphones, (3) the reliability of noise-band thresholds improved with broader stimulus bandwidth and was either equal to or better than pure-tone thresholds, and (4) frequency-specificity declined with stimulus bandwidths greater than one equivalent rectangular band, which could complicate early detection of hearing changes that occur within a narrow frequency range.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that circumaural earphones such as the HDA200 headphones provide better reliability for audiometric testing as compared to the TDH-39P earphones. These data support the use of noise bands, preferably ERB noises, as stimuli for audiometric monitoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiometry; noise-induced hearing loss; occupational health; reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25549164      PMCID: PMC4559258          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.979300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  6 in total

1.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data.

Authors:  E H Berger; J R Franks; A Behar; J G Casali; C Dixon-Ernst; R W Kieper; C J Merry; B T Mozo; C W Nixon; D Ohlin; J D Royster; L H Royster
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Short-term variability of pure-tone thresholds obtained with TDH-39P earphones.

Authors:  Gregory A Flamme; Mark R Stephenson; Kristy K Deiters; Amanda Hessenauer; Devon K VanGessel; Kyle Geda; Krista Wyllys; Kara D McGregor
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Reference equivalent threshold levels for pure tones and 1/3-oct noise bands: insert earphone and TDH-49 earphone.

Authors:  R M Cox; D M McDaniel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Otoacoustic emissions, pure-tone audiometry, and self-reported hearing.

Authors:  Bo Engdahl; Kristian Tambs; Howard J Hoffman
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Comparison of the roex and gammachirp filters as representations of the auditory filter.

Authors:  Masashi Unoki; Toshio Irino; Brian Glasberg; Brian C J Moore; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Going wireless and booth-less for hearing testing in industry.

Authors:  Deanna K Meinke; Jesse A Norris; Brendan P Flynn; Odile H Clavier
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System.

Authors:  Odile H Clavier; James A Norris; David W Hinckley; William Hal Martin; Shi Yuan Lee; Sigfrid D Soli; Douglas S Brungart; Jaclyn R Schurman; Erik Larsen; Golbarg Mehraei; Tera M Quigley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Hearing loss as a predictor for hearing protection attenuation among miners.

Authors:  Elon D Ullman; Lauren M Smith; Marjorie C McCullagh; Richard L Neitzel
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.948

4.  Noise exposure and auditory thresholds of military musicians: a follow up study.

Authors:  Reinhard Müller; Joachim Schneider
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.646

5.  Extended high frequency hearing and speech perception implications in adults and children.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Brian B Monson; David R Moore; Sumitrajit Dhar; Beverly A Wright; Kevin J Munro; Lina Motlagh Zadeh; Chelsea M Blankenship; Samantha M Stiepan; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.208

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.