Randolph C Grace1, Bronwyn M Kivell2, Murray Laugesen3. 1. University of Canterbury, Department of Psychology, Christchurch, New Zealand; randolph.grace@canterbury.ac.nz. 2. School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand; 3. University of Canterbury, Department of Psychology, Christchurch, New Zealand; Health New Zealand, Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to measure the cross-price elasticity of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and simulated demand for tobacco cigarettes both in the presence and absence of e-cigarette availability. METHOD: A sample of New Zealand smokers (N = 210) completed a Cigarette Purchase Task to indicate their demand for tobacco at a range of prices. They sampled an e-cigarette and rated it and their own-brand tobacco for favorability, and indicated how many e-cigarettes and regular cigarettes they would purchase at 0.5×, 1×, and 2× the current market price for regular cigarettes, assuming that the price of e-cigarettes remained constant. RESULTS: Cross-price elasticity for e-cigarettes was estimated as 0.16, and was significantly positive, indicating that e-cigarettes were partially substitutable for regular cigarettes. Simulated demand for regular cigarettes at current market prices decreased by 42.8% when e-cigarettes were available, and e-cigarettes were rated 81% as favorably as own-brand tobacco. However when cigarettes cost 2× the current market price, significantly more smokers said they would quit (50.2%) if e-cigarettes were not available than if they were available (30.0%). CONCLUSION: Results show that e-cigarettes are potentially substitutable for regular cigarettes and their availability will reduce tobacco consumption. However, e-cigarettes may discourage smokers from quitting entirely as cigarette price increases, so policy makers should consider maintaining a constant relative price differential between e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes.
INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to measure the cross-price elasticity of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and simulated demand for tobacco cigarettes both in the presence and absence of e-cigarette availability. METHOD: A sample of New Zealand smokers (N = 210) completed a Cigarette Purchase Task to indicate their demand for tobacco at a range of prices. They sampled an e-cigarette and rated it and their own-brand tobacco for favorability, and indicated how many e-cigarettes and regular cigarettes they would purchase at 0.5×, 1×, and 2× the current market price for regular cigarettes, assuming that the price of e-cigarettes remained constant. RESULTS: Cross-price elasticity for e-cigarettes was estimated as 0.16, and was significantly positive, indicating that e-cigarettes were partially substitutable for regular cigarettes. Simulated demand for regular cigarettes at current market prices decreased by 42.8% when e-cigarettes were available, and e-cigarettes were rated 81% as favorably as own-brand tobacco. However when cigarettes cost 2× the current market price, significantly more smokers said they would quit (50.2%) if e-cigarettes were not available than if they were available (30.0%). CONCLUSION: Results show that e-cigarettes are potentially substitutable for regular cigarettes and their availability will reduce tobacco consumption. However, e-cigarettes may discourage smokers from quitting entirely as cigarette price increases, so policy makers should consider maintaining a constant relative price differential between e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes.
Authors: Bryan W Heckman; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; Sara Hitchman; Richard J O'Connor; Warren K Bickel; Jeffrey S Stein; Hua-Hie Yong; Georges J Nahhas; Derek A Pope; Ce Shang; Kai-Wen Cheng; David T Levy; K Michael Cummings Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Amanda J Quisenberry; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Leonard H Epstein; Warren K Bickel Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: William Brady DeHart; Alexandra M Mellis; Brent A Kaplan; Derek A Pope; Warren K Bickel Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Andrew J Barnes; Rose S Bono; Alyssa K Rudy; Cosima Hoetger; Nicole E Nicksic; Caroline O Cobb Journal: Addiction Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Bryan W Heckman; K Michael Cummings; Georges J Nahas; Marc C Willemsen; Richard J O'Connor; Ron Borland; Alexander A Hirsch; Warren K Bickel; Matthew J Carpenter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Cecilia L Bergeria; Sean B Dolan; Matthew W Johnson; Claudia M Campbell; Kelly E Dunn Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 4.153