Literature DB >> 25548208

Impact of cow size on dry matter intake, residual feed intake, metabolic response, and cow performance.

R S Walker, R M Martin, G T Gentry, L R Gentry.   

Abstract

Thirty-eight Angus-cross beef cows were used to evaluate differences in DMI, residual feed intake (RFI), and endocrine markers on the basis of cow size and RFI ranking during 2 stages of production. Cows housed in individual pens (2.2 × 9.1 m) were fed, over a 70-d feeding period, 30% Bermuda grass hay and 70% ryegrass baleage diet during lactation (LACT) and a 100% ryegrass hay diet during postweaning (NOLACT). Individual daily feed intake, BW, and BCS were recorded, and hip height was used to determine frame score (FS). Feed intake was used to calculate RFI for each cow, and cow was the experimental unit. Blood samples were obtained on d 0 and 70 and were analyzed for glucose, insulin, leptin, triiodothyronine (T3), and thyroxine (T4). Cows were assigned to a light (LIT) or heavy (HEV) BW groups on the basis of mean BW at the beginning of the LACT period. On the basis of RFI values for each feeding period, cows were placed into a negative (NEG; RFI < 0.00) or positive (POS; RFI > 0.00) RFI group and into a low (LOW; ≤0.2 SD mean RFI), medium (MED; within ±0.19 SD), or high (HI; ≥0.2 SD mean RFI) RFI group. During LACT, DMI was 4.8% greater (P = 0.03) and FS was greater (P < 0.01; 6.4 and 5.5 ± 0.16) for the HEV compared with LIT BW cows. No RFI by day interaction or RFI group main effect occurred for endocrine markers during LACT; however, a negative relationship (P = 0.04) existed between BW group and combined T3 data, and a positive relationship (P = 0.04) existed between RFI and combined insulin data. For both LACT and NOLACT, RFI was similar (P > 0.05) among BW groups; however, DMI was 6.5% and 8.9% greater (P < 0.01) for POS compared with NEG RFI in the LACT and NOLACT periods. In LACT, DMI was greater (P < 0.01) for HI and MED RFI compared with LOW RFI, and in NOLACT, DMI was greater (P < 0.01) for the HI compared with MED and LOW RFI cows and MED compared with LOW RFI cows. During NOLACT, DMI was 8.9% greater (P < 0.01) for the HEV (12.4 ± 0.22 kg) compared with LIT (11.3 ± 0.19 kg) BW cows. Change in BCS was greater (P ≤ 0.03) in higher RFI cows in both RFI groups only in the NOLACT period. Differences in T3 and T4 on d 0 and 70 were 25% and 15% greater (P ≤ 0.04) for the LIT BW group compared with the HEV BW group. A negative correlation existed (P ≤ 0.04) between BW group and T3 and T4, as well as leptin and RFI (P = 0.03). Although cow BW was independent of RFI and T3 and T4 levels tended to be greater in lighter BW cows, DMI was consistently greater for cows with heavier BW and higher RFIvalues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25548208     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-7702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Relationship between performance, metabolic profile, and feed efficiency of lactating beef cows.

Authors:  Luana Lelis Souza; Mariana Furtado Zorzetto; Túlio José Terra Ricci; Roberta Carrilho Canesin; Nhayandra Christina Dias E Silva; João Alberto Negrão; Joslaine Noely Dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Water and forage intake, diet digestibility, and blood parameters of beef cows and heifers consuming water with varying concentrations of total dissolved salts.

Authors:  Alexandra N Moehlenpah; Luana P S Ribeiro; Ryszard Puchala; Arthur Louis Goetsch; Paul Beck; Adel Pezeshki; Megan A Gross; Amanda L Holder; David L Lalman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Evaluation of Brassica carinata meal as a protein supplement for growing beef heifers1,2.

Authors:  Tessa M Schulmeister; Martin Ruiz-Moreno; Gleise M Silva; M Garcia-Ascolani; Francine M Ciriaco; Darren D Henry; Graham Cliff Lamb; Jose C B Dubeux; Nicolas Dilorenzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Intake and feed utilization in two breeds of pregnant beef cows fed forages with high-fiber concentrations.

Authors:  Mikaela Jardstedt; Anna Hessle; Peder Nørgaard; Linn Frendberg; Elisabet Nadeau
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Feed efficiency and maternal productivity of Bos indicus beef cows.

Authors:  Danielly Fernanda Broleze; Luana Lelis Souza; Mariana Furtado Zorzetto; Rodrigo Pelicioni Savegnago; João Alberto Negrão; Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Influence of Residual Feed Intake and Cow Age on Beef Cattle Performance, Supplement Intake, Resource Use, and Grazing Behavior on Winter Mixed-Grass Rangelands.

Authors:  Cory T Parsons; Julia M Dafoe; Samuel A Wyffels; Timothy DelCurto; Darrin L Boss
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Association of residual feed intake with growth and slaughtering performance, blood metabolism, and body composition in growing lambs.

Authors:  Xiaoxue Zhang; Weimin Wang; Futao Mo; Yongfu La; Chong Li; Fadi Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Associations of Blood Analysis with Feed Efficiency and Developmental Stage in Grass-Fed Beef Heifers.

Authors:  Nara R B Cônsolo; Jasper C Munro; Stéphanie L Bourgon; Niel A Karrow; Alan H Fredeen; Janel E Martell; Yuri R Montanholi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Relationships among feed efficiency traits across production segments and production cycles in cattle.

Authors:  Phillip A Lancaster; Michael E Davis; Jack J Rutledge; Larry V Cundiff
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.