Literature DB >> 25548097

The influence of intraluminal thrombus on noninvasive abdominal aortic aneurysm wall distensibility measurement.

Eleni Metaxa1, Nikolaos Kontopodis, Vasileios Vavourakis, Konstantinos Tzirakis, Christos V Ioannou, Yannis Papaharilaou.   

Abstract

Abdominal aortic aneurysm wall distensibility can be estimated by measuring pulse pressure and the corresponding sac volume change, which can be obtained by measuring wall displacement. This approach, however, may introduce error if the role of thrombus in assisting the wall in bearing the pulse pressure loading is neglected. Our aim was to introduce a methodology for evaluating and potentially correcting this error in estimating distensibility. Electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography images of eleven patients were obtained, and the volume change between diastole and systole was measured. Using finite element procedures, we determined the equivalent pulse pressure loading that should be applied to the wall of a model where thrombus was digitally removed, to yield the same sac volumetric increase caused by applying the luminal pulse pressure to the model with thrombus. The equivalent instead of the measured pulse pressure was used in the distensibility expression. For a relative volumetric thrombus deposition (V ILT) of 50 %, a 62 % distensibility underestimation resulted when thrombus role was neglected. A strong linear correlation was observed between distensibility underestimation and V ILT. To assess the potential value of noninvasive wall distensibility measurement in rupture risk stratification, the role of thrombus on wall loading should be further investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25548097     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-014-1235-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  38 in total

1.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability.

Authors:  M L Raghavan; D A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a general defect in the vasculature with focal manifestations in the abdominal aorta?

Authors:  B Sonesson; F Hansen; T Länne
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysmal wall.

Authors:  G W Schurink; J M van Baalen; M J Visser; J H van Bockel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue.

Authors:  Elena S Di Martino; Ajay Bohra; Jonathan P Vande Geest; Navyash Gupta; Michel S Makaroun; David A Vorp
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Trans-thrombus blood pressure effects in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Clark A Meyer; Carine Guivier-Curien; James E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Effect of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress.

Authors:  W R Mower; W J Quiñones; S S Gambhir
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Towards patient-specific risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  M Breeuwer; S de Putter; U Kose; L Speelman; K Visser; F Gerritsen; R Hoogeveen; R Krams; H van den Bosch; J Buth; T Gunther; B Wolters; E van Dam; F van de Vosse
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Micromechanical characterization of intra-luminal thrombus tissue from abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  T Christian Gasser; Giampaolo Martufi; Martin Auer; Maggie Folkesson; Jesper Swedenborg
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  A numerical model to predict abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion based on local wall stress and stiffness.

Authors:  F Helderman; I J Manoch; M Breeuwer; U Kose; O Schouten; M R M van Sambeek; D Poldermans; P T M Pattynama; W Wisselink; A F W van der Steen; R Krams
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  The importance of patient-specific regionally varying wall thickness in abdominal aortic aneurysm biomechanics.

Authors:  Samarth S Raut; Anirban Jana; Victor De Oliveira; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  4 in total

1.  A new inverse method for estimation of in vivo mechanical properties of the aortic wall.

Authors:  Minliang Liu; Liang Liang; Wei Sun
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-05-02

2.  Quantitative Aortic Distensibility Measurement Using CT in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Reproducibility and Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Yunfei Zha; Gongling Peng; Liang Li; Chunying Yang; Xuesong Lu; Zhoufeng Peng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Non-Invasive Pulse Wave Analysis in a Thrombus-Free Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm after Implantation of a Nitinol Aortic Endograft.

Authors:  Efstratios Georgakarakos; Christos Argyriou; George S Georgiadis; Miltos K Lazarides
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-01-11

Review 4.  The - Not So - Solid 5.5 cm Threshold for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Facts, Misinterpretations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kontopodis; Dimitrios Pantidis; Athansios Dedes; Nikolaos Daskalakis; Christos V Ioannou
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-01-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.