| Literature DB >> 25546054 |
Xiaojun Guo1, Sifeng Liu2, Lifeng Wu2, Lingling Tang3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this study, a novel grey self-memory coupling model was developed to forecast the incidence rates of two notifiable infectious diseases (dysentery and gonorrhea); the effectiveness and applicability of this model was assessed based on its ability to predict the epidemiological trend of infectious diseases in China.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25546054 PMCID: PMC4278705 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of variance ratio and small error probability obtained in the accuracy test.
| Modeling accuracy class | Test index | |
| Variance ratio C | Small error probability p | |
| 1st level (superior) |
|
|
| 2nd level (qualified) |
|
|
| 3rd level (marginal) |
|
|
| 4th level (disqualified) |
|
|
Figure 1Programming procedure for the SMGM(1,1) model.
Simulated values and errors of the linear model, the GM(1,1) model and the SMGM(1,1) model for the incidence rate of dysentery (1/105).
| Linear model | GM(1,1) model | SMGM(1,1) model | |||||
| Year | Original Value | Simulative value | APE | Simulative value | APE | Simulative value | APE |
| 2004 | 38.30 | 37.91 | 1.01% | 38.3 | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 34.92 | 34.77 | 0.44% | 35.38 | 1.32% | — | — |
| 2006 | 32.36 | 31.62 | 2.28% | 31.22 | 3.52% | 32.40 | 0.12% |
| 2007 | 27.99 | 28.47 | 1.73% | 27.55 | 1.57% | 27.45 | 1.93% |
| 2008 | 23.43 | 25.33 | 8.10% | 24.32 | 3.80% | 24.60 | 4.99% |
| 2009 | 20.45 | 22.18 | 8.47% | 21.46 | 4.94% | 19.93 | 2.54% |
| 2010 | 18.90 | 19.03 | 0.71% | 18.94 | 0.21% | 18.42 | 2.54% |
| 2011 | 17.74 | 15.89 | 10.44% | 16.71 | 5.81% | 18.06 | 1.80% |
| MAPE | 4.15% | 3.02% | 2.32% | ||||
| 2012 | 15.40 | 12.74 | 17.26% | 14.75 | 4.22% | 15.12 | 1.82% |
There is no simulated value for the first two time-points because of the retrospective order .
Simulated values and errors of the linear model, the GM(1,1) model and the SMGM(1,1) model for the incidence rate of gonorrhea (1/105).
| Linear model | GM(1,1) model | SMGM(1,1) model | |||||
| Year | Original Value | Simulative value | APE | Simulative value | APE | Simulative value | APE |
| 2004 | 17.34 | 15.30 | 11.78% | 17.34 | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 13.79 | 14.10 | 2.22% | 13.67 | 0.87% | — | — |
| 2006 | 12.14 | 12.90 | 6.23% | 12.29 | 1.24% | 12.14 | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 11.08 | 11.70 | 5.55% | 11.05 | 0.27% | 11.11 | 0.27% |
| 2008 | 9.90 | 10.49 | 6.00% | 9.93 | 0.30% | 9.85 | 0.51% |
| 2009 | 9.02 | 9.29 | 3.03% | 8.93 | 1.00% | 8.96 | 0.67% |
| 2010 | 7.91 | 8.09 | 2.31% | 8.03 | 1.52% | 8.03 | 1.52% |
| 2011 | 7.31 | 6.89 | 5.71% | 7.21 | 1.37% | 7.28 | 0.41% |
| MAPE | 5.36% | 0.94% | 0.56% | ||||
| 2012 | 6.82 | 5.69 | 16.55% | 6.49 | 4.84% | 6.64 | 2.64% |
There is no simulated value for the first two time-points because of the retrospective order .
Figure 2Comparison of incidence rates and simulated values among the three different prediction models for dysentery.
Figure 5Relative percentage error distribution of the three different prediction models for gonorrhea from 2006 to 2012.