Seth A Berkowitz1, James B Meigs2, Darren DeWalt3, Hilary K Seligman4, Lily S Barnard5, Oliver-John M Bright6, Marie Schow6, Steven J Atlas2, Deborah J Wexler7. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston2Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill. 4. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco6Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California. 5. currently an undergraduate in the Community Health Program, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts8currently an undergraduate in the Biology Program, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts. 6. currently an undergraduate in the Community Health Program, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts. 7. Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Increasing access to care may be insufficient to improve the health of patients with diabetes mellitus and unmet basic needs (hereinafter referred to as material need insecurities). How specific material need insecurities relate to clinical outcomes and the use of health care resources in a setting of near-universal access to health care is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of food insecurity, cost-related medication underuse, housing instability, and energy insecurity with control of diabetes mellitus and the use of health care resources. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional data were collected from June 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013, at 1 academic primary care clinic, 2 community health centers, and 1 specialty center for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in Massachusetts. A random sample of 411 patients, stratified by clinic, consisted of adults (aged ≥21 years) with diabetes mellitus (response rate, 62.3%). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The prespecified primary outcome was a composite indicator of poor diabetes control (hemoglobin A1c level, >9.0%; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, >100 mg/dL; or blood pressure, >140/90 mm Hg). Prespecified secondary outcomes included outpatient visits and a composite of emergency department (ED) visits and acute care hospitalizations (ED/inpatient visits). RESULTS: Overall, 19.1% of respondents reported food insecurity; 27.6%, cost-related medication underuse; 10.7%, housing instability; 14.1%, energy insecurity; and 39.1%, at least 1 material need insecurity. Poor diabetes control was observed in 46.0% of respondents. In multivariable models, food insecurity was associated with a greater odds of poor diabetes control (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.97 [95% CI, 1.58-2.47]) and increased outpatient visits (adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR], 1.19 [95% CI, 1.05-1.36]) but not increased ED/inpatient visits (IRR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.51-1.97]). Cost-related medication underuse was associated with poor diabetes control (OR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.35-2.70]) and increased ED/inpatient visits (IRR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.21-2.34]) but not outpatient visits (IRR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.95-1.21]). Housing instability (IRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.14-1.51]) and energy insecurity (IRR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.00-1.25]) were associated with increased outpatient visits but not with diabetes control (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.60-2.02] and OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.96-1.69], respectively) or with ED/inpatient visits (IRR, 1.49 [95% CI, 0.81-2.73] and IRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.80-2.13], respectively). An increasing number of insecurities was associated with poor diabetes control (OR for each additional need, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.18-1.63]) and increased use of health care resources (IRR for outpatient visits, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.03-1.15]; IRR for ED/inpatient visits, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.99-1.51]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Material need insecurities were common among patients with diabetes mellitus and had varying but generally adverse associations with diabetes control and the use of health care resources. Material need insecurities may be important targets for improving care of diabetes mellitus.
IMPORTANCE: Increasing access to care may be insufficient to improve the health of patients with diabetes mellitus and unmet basic needs (hereinafter referred to as material need insecurities). How specific material need insecurities relate to clinical outcomes and the use of health care resources in a setting of near-universal access to health care is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of food insecurity, cost-related medication underuse, housing instability, and energy insecurity with control of diabetes mellitus and the use of health care resources. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional data were collected from June 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013, at 1 academic primary care clinic, 2 community health centers, and 1 specialty center for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in Massachusetts. A random sample of 411 patients, stratified by clinic, consisted of adults (aged ≥21 years) with diabetes mellitus (response rate, 62.3%). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The prespecified primary outcome was a composite indicator of poor diabetes control (hemoglobin A1c level, >9.0%; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, >100 mg/dL; or blood pressure, >140/90 mm Hg). Prespecified secondary outcomes included outpatient visits and a composite of emergency department (ED) visits and acute care hospitalizations (ED/inpatient visits). RESULTS: Overall, 19.1% of respondents reported food insecurity; 27.6%, cost-related medication underuse; 10.7%, housing instability; 14.1%, energy insecurity; and 39.1%, at least 1 material need insecurity. Poor diabetes control was observed in 46.0% of respondents. In multivariable models, food insecurity was associated with a greater odds of poor diabetes control (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.97 [95% CI, 1.58-2.47]) and increased outpatient visits (adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR], 1.19 [95% CI, 1.05-1.36]) but not increased ED/inpatient visits (IRR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.51-1.97]). Cost-related medication underuse was associated with poor diabetes control (OR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.35-2.70]) and increased ED/inpatient visits (IRR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.21-2.34]) but not outpatient visits (IRR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.95-1.21]). Housing instability (IRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.14-1.51]) and energy insecurity (IRR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.00-1.25]) were associated with increased outpatient visits but not with diabetes control (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.60-2.02] and OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.96-1.69], respectively) or with ED/inpatient visits (IRR, 1.49 [95% CI, 0.81-2.73] and IRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.80-2.13], respectively). An increasing number of insecurities was associated with poor diabetes control (OR for each additional need, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.18-1.63]) and increased use of health care resources (IRR for outpatient visits, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.03-1.15]; IRR for ED/inpatient visits, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.99-1.51]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Material need insecurities were common among patients with diabetes mellitus and had varying but generally adverse associations with diabetes control and the use of health care resources. Material need insecurities may be important targets for improving care of diabetes mellitus.
Authors: Niteesh K Choudhry; Katsiaryna Bykov; William H Shrank; Michele Toscano; Wayne S Rawlins; Lonny Reisman; Troyen A Brennan; Jessica M Franklin Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Shreya Kangovi; Frances K Barg; Tamala Carter; Kathryn Levy; Jeffrey Sellman; Judith A Long; David Grande Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Rebekah J Walker; Brittany L Smalls; Jennifer A Campbell; Joni L Strom Williams; Leonard E Egede Journal: Endocrine Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Rui Li; Lawrence E Barker; Sundar Shrestha; Ping Zhang; O Kenrick Duru; Tony Pearson-Clarke; Edward W Gregg Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Seth A Berkowitz; Sara Kalkhoran; Samuel T Edwards; Utibe R Essien; Travis P Baggett Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Emily B Schroeder; Chan Zeng; Andrew T Sterrett; Tina K Kimpo; Andrea R Paolino; John F Steiner Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: R Neal Axon; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Clara E Dismuke; Kelly J Hunt; Derik Yeager; Elizabeth J Santa Ana; Leonard E Egede Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Margaret A Powers; Joan Bardsley; Marjorie Cypress; Paulina Duker; Martha M Funnell; Amy Hess Fischl; Melinda D Maryniuk; Linda Siminerio; Eva Vivian Journal: Clin Diabetes Date: 2016-04
Authors: Rebekah J Walker; Emma Garacci; Jennifer A Campbell; Melissa Harris; Elise Mosley-Johnson; Leonard E Egede Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2020-03-13
Authors: Seth A Berkowitz; Linda M Delahanty; Jean Terranova; Barbara Steiner; Melanie P Ruazol; Roshni Singh; Naysha N Shahid; Deborah J Wexler Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Seth A Berkowitz; Andrew J Karter; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Hilary K Seligman; Sarah A Ackroyd; Lily S Barnard; Steven J Atlas; Deborah J Wexler Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 19.112